Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T10:53:39.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Canadian Temperance Movement: Contemporary Parallels*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2014

Anton R.F. Schweighofer
Anton R.F. Schweighofer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The similarities between the Canadian temperance movement and the contemporary war on drugs are examined. The similarities in rhetorical, educational, social and political tactics suggest that contemporary anti-drug policy relies on techniques Canadians rejected sixty years ago when they rejected alcohol prohibition. A rethinking of contemporary drug policy is therefore in order.

Résumé

L'auteur analyse les similitudes entre le mouvement pour la tempérance qui s'est manifesté au début du siècle et la lutte plus récente contre les drogues au Canada. Les ressemblances observables au niveau des stratégies rhétoriques, éducationnelles, sociales et politiques donnent à penser que la politique actuelle de lutte contre la consommation des drogues s'appuie sur des techniques que les Canadiens ont désavouées, il y a soixante ans, en refusant la prohibition de l'alcool. Un réexamen de la politique actuelle relativement aux drogues paraît, en conséquence, s'imposer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 3 , 1988 , pp. 175 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Brecher, E.M., Licit and Illict Drugs (Boston: Little, Brown, 1972), 265–266Google Scholar; Hallowell, G.A., Prohibition in Ontario 1919-1923 (Toronto: Ontario Historical Society, 1972)Google Scholar; Smart, R.G. and Ogborne, A.C., Northern Spirits: Drinking in Canada Then and Now (Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1986)Google Scholar.

2. Hallowell, , Prohibition in Ontario 1919-1923, 11Google Scholar.

3. Allen, H.T., Forty Years Journey: The Temperance Movement in British Columbia to 1900 (Victoria: B.C. Historical Society, 1981), 10Google Scholar; Thompson, J.H., “The Beginning of our Regeneration: The Great War and Western Canadian Reform Movements,” in Francis, R.D. and Smith, D.B. (eds.), Readings in Canadian History (Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston of Canada Ltd., 1972), 287Google Scholar.

4. Guillet, E.C., Pioneer Days in Upper Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1933), 145Google Scholar.

5. Ibid., 145.

6. Chiniquy, C., Manual of the Temperance Society (Montreal: Lovell and Gibson, 1847), 26Google Scholar.

7. Hallowell, Prohibition in Ontario 1919-1923; Smart and Ogborne, Northern Spirits.

8. See, for example, Timberlake, J.H., Prohibition and the Progressive Movement 1900-1920 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9. Cloyd, J.W., Drugs and Information Control: The Role of Men and Manipulation in the Control of Drug Trafficking (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1982)Google Scholar; Gusfield, J., Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963)Google Scholar; McCandless, P., “Curses of Civilization: Insanity and Drunkenness in Victorian Britain,” British Journal of Addiction 79 (1984)Google ScholarPubMed; Vogt, I., “Defining Alcohol Problems as a Repressive Mechanism: Its Formative Phase in Imperial Germany and Its Strength Today,” The International Journal of the Addictions 19 (1984)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

10. Boyd, N., “The Origins of Canadian Narcotics Legislation: The Process of Criminalization in Historical Context,” Dalhousie Law Journal 8 (1984)Google Scholar; Comack, A.E., “The Origins of Canadian Drug Legislation: Labelling Versus Analysis,” in Fleming, T. (ed.), The New Criminologies in Canada (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1985)Google Scholar; Mitchell, C.N., “A Justice-Based Argument for the Uniform Regulation of Psychoactive Drugs,” McGill Law Journal 31 (1986)Google Scholar; Small, S.J., “Canadian Narcotics Legislation, 1908-1923: A Conflict Model Interpretation,” in Greenaway, W.K. and Brickley, S.L. (eds.), Law and Social Control in Canada (Scarborough: Prentice-Hall, 1978)Google Scholar; Solomon, R.R. and Green, M., “The First Century: The History of Non-Medical Opiate Use and Control Policies in Canada, 1870-1970,” in Blackwell, J.C. and Erickson, P.G. (eds.), Illicit Drugs in Canada: A Risky Business (Toronto: Methuen Publications, prepublication edition, 1988)Google Scholar.

11. Berridge, V. and Edwards, G., Opium and the People: Opiate Use in Nineteenth Century England (London: Allen Lane, 1981)Google Scholar; Szasz, T., Ceremonial Chemistry: The Ritual Persecution of Drugs, Addicts and Pushers (Garden City, N.J.: Anchor Press, 1975)Google Scholar.

12. See, for example, Cloyd, Drugs and Information Control.

13. Guillet, Pioneer Days in Upper Canada; Smart and Ogborne, Northern Spirits, Chapter 1.

14. Chiniquy, , Manual of the Temperance Society, 107Google Scholar.

15. Select Committee of the Legislative Assembly of Canada, 1849, cited by Spence, R.E., Prohibition in Canada (Toronto: The Ontario Branch of the Dominion Alliance, 1919), 86Google Scholar.

16. Alexander, B.K. and Dibb, G.S., “Opiate Addicts and their Parents,” Family Process 14 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Braucht, G.N., Brakarsh, D., Follingstad, D. and Berry, K.L., “Deviant Drug Use in Adolescence: A Review of the Psychosocial Correlates,” Psychological Bulletin 79 (1973)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Browne, A. and Finkelhor, D., “Impact of Child Sexual Abuse: A Review of the Research,” Psychological Bulletin 99 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chein, I., Gerard, D.L., Lee, R.S., and Rosenfeld, E., The Road to H: Narcotics, Delinquency, and Social Policy (New York: Basic Books, 1964)Google Scholar; Harlow, L.L., Newcomb, M.D. and Bentler, P.M., “Depression, Self-Derogation, Substance Use, and Suicide Ideation: Lack of Purpose in Life as a Mediational Factor,” Journal of Clinical Psychology 421 (1986)Google Scholar; Helzer, J.E., Robins, L.N. and Davis, D.H., “Antecedents of Narcotic Use and Addiction: A Study of 898 Vietnam Veterans,” Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1 (1975/1976)Google Scholar; Wurmser, L., The Hidden Dimension: Psychodynamics in Compulsive Drug Use (New York: Jason Aronson, 1978)Google Scholar; Yeary, J., “Incest and Chemical Dependency,” Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 14 (1982)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

17. Cruickshank, J., “PM Promises Tax Reforms, Drug Controls,” The Globe and Mail (September 15, 1986), A1Google Scholar.

18. Blackwell, J.C., “Drifting, Controlling and Overcoming: Opiate Users Who Avoid Becoming Chronically Dependent,” Journal of Drug Issues 13 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Erickson, P.G., Cannabis Criminals (Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1980)Google Scholar; Hollander, M.J. and Davis, B.L., Trends in Adolescent Alcohol and Drug Use in Vancouver (Vancouver: Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Health, Alcohol and Drug Programs, 1983)Google Scholar; Smart, R.G., Forbidden Highs: The Nature, Treatment and Prevention of Illicit Drug Abuse (Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1983)Google Scholar; Smart, R.G. and Adlaf, E.M., Alcohol and Other Drug Use Among Ontario Students in 1987, and Trends since 1977 (Toronto: Alcoholism and Drug Addiction Research Foundation, 1987)Google Scholar; Smart, R.G., Adlaf, E.M. and Goodstadt, M.S., “Alcohol and Other Drug Use Among Ontario Students: An Update,” Canadian Journal of Public Health 77 (1986)Google ScholarPubMed; Rootman, I., “Recent Trends in Cannabis Use in Canada,” Drug and Alchohol Dependence 4 (1979)Google Scholar; Smart, P.G., Goodstadt, M.S., Adlaf, E.M., Sheppard, M.A. and Chan, G.C., “Trends in the Prevalence of Alcohol and Other Drug Use Among Ontario Students: 1977-1983,” Canadian Journal of Public Health 76 (1985)Google ScholarPubMed.

19. Erickson, P.G., Adlaf, E.M., Murray, G.G. and Smart, R.G., The Steel Drug: Cocaine in Perspective (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1987), 52Google Scholar; Maclennan, A., ‘“Crack’ Threat to Canada Being Overplayed,” The Journal 15 (8) 1986Google Scholar.

20. Vancouver Province, September 3, 1987.

21. Poirier, P., “PM's War on Drug “Epidemic” Baffles Experts,” The Globe and Mail (September 16, 1986), A1Google Scholar.

22. Stevenson, G.H., Lingley, L.R., Trasov, G.E., and Stansfield, H., Drug Addiction in British Columbia (Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 1956), 510Google Scholar. [Emphasis added.]

23. Brecher, Licit and Illicit Drugs.

24. Ibid., 22.

25. Waldorf, D., Murphy, S., Reinarman, C. and Joyce, C., Doing Coke: An Ethnography of Cocaine Users and Sellers (Washington, D.C.: Drug Abuse Council, 1977)Google Scholar.

26. Grinspoon, L. and Bakalar, J.B., Cocaine: A Drug and Its Social Evolution (New York: Basic Books, 1976)Google Scholar.

27. Erickson, Adlaf, Murray and Smart, The Steel Drug.

28. See Silver, G. and Aldrich, M. (eds.), The Dope Chronicles 1850-1950 (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1979)Google Scholar.

29. Erickson, Adlaf, Murray and Smart, The Steel Drug; Fejer, D., Smart, R.G., Whitehead, P.C. and Laforest, L., “Sources of Information About Drugs Among High School Students,” Public Opinion Quarterly 35 (1971), 235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sheppard, M.A., “Sources of Information About Drugs,” Journal of Drug Education 10 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smart, R.G. and Fejer, D., “Credibility of Sources of Drug Information for High School Students,” Journal of Drug Issues 2 (1972), 8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30. Altheide, D.L., Creating Reality: How TV News Distorts Events (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc. 1976)Google Scholar; Behr, R.L. and Iyengar, S., “Television News, Real-World Cues, and Changes in the Public Agenda,” Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Erbring, L., Goldenberg, E.N. and Miller, A.H., “Front-Page News and Real World Cues: A New Look at Agenda Setting by the Media,” American Journal of Political Science 24 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Iyengar, S., Peters, M.D. and Kinder, D.R., “Experimental Demonstrations of the “Not-so-Minimal” Consequences of Television News Programs,” The American Political Science Review 76 (1982)Google Scholar.

31. Iyengar, , Peters, and Kinder, , “Experimental Demonstrations of the “Not-so-Minimal” Consequences,” 855Google Scholar.

32. May 7, 1987, Langley, British Columbia.

33. See, for example, Bennett, W.L., News: The Politics of Illusion (New York: Longman Inc., 1983)Google Scholar.

34. Ibid.

35. Bennett, , News: The Politics of IllusionCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zinberg, N.E. and Robertson, J.A., Drugs and the Public (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1972)Google Scholar, Chapter 2.

36. Ginsberg, B., The Captive Public: How Mass Opinion Promotes State Power (New York: Basic Books, 1986)Google Scholar.

37. Josephson, E., “Marijuana Decriminalization: The Processes and Prospects of Change,” Contemporary Drug Problems 10 (1981)Google Scholar; Maloff, D., “A Review of the Effects of the Decriminalization of Marijuana,” Contemporary Drug Problems 10 (1981)Google Scholar; Roffman, R.A., “Interstate Marijuana Law Enforcement—An Analysis of Local Attitudes and Criminal Justice System Accommodations,” Contemporary Drug Problems 9 (1980)Google Scholar; Roffman, R.A., “Marijuana and its Control in the Late 1970's,” Contemporary Drug Problems 6 (1977)Google Scholar; Saveland, W. and Bray, D.F., “Trends in Cannabis Use Among American States with Different and Changing Legal Regimes, 1972-1977,” Contemporary Drug Problems 10 (1981), 335–361Google Scholar.

38. Smart, and Ogborne, , Northern Spirits, 31Google Scholar.

39. Bakalar, J.B. and Grinspoon, L., Drug Control in a Free Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 83Google Scholar.

40. Gordon, E.D., Women Torch-Bearers: The Story of the Woman's Christian Temperance Union (Evanston, Illinois: National Womens Christian Temperance Union, 1924), 38Google Scholar; Hallowell, , Prohibition in Ontario 1919-1923, 25Google Scholar; Manitoba Free Press, March 4, 1916; Victoria Daily Times, May 3, 1906.

41. Weil, A. and Rosen, W., Chocolates to Morphine: Understanding Mind-Active Drugs (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1983)Google Scholar.

42. Victoria Daily Colonist, January 4, 1906, 4.

43. Ibid.

44. Smart, , Forbidden Highs, 69Google Scholar.

45. Smart, R.G. and Fejer, D., “The Effect of High and Low Fear Messages About Drugs,” Journal of Drug Education 4 (1974), 225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46. Bakalar, and Grinspoon, , Drug Control in a Free Society, 101Google Scholar; Chng, C.L., “The Goal of Abstinence: Implications for Drug Education,” Journal of Drug Education 11 (1981), 13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47. Fors, S.W., “On the Ethics of Selective Omission and/or Inclusion of Relevant Information in School Drug Education Programs,” Journal of Drug Education 10 (1980), 111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sheppard, M.A., Goodstadt, M.S. and Chan, G., “Drug Education in Ontario Schools: Content and Process,” Journal of Drug Education 11 (1981), 317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sheppard, M.A., Goodstadt, M.S. and Williamson, B., “Drug Education: Why We Have So Little Impact,” Journal of Drug Education 15 (1985), 1–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

48. Chng, , “The Goal of Abstinence,” 13Google Scholar.

49. Sheppard, , Goodstadt, and Williamson, , “Drug Education,” 3Google Scholar.

50. Le Dain, G., “Interim Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Non-Medical Use of Drugs” (Ottawa: Information Canada, 1971), 85Google Scholar; Weil, and Rosen, , Chocolate to Morphine, 120Google Scholar.

51. Brecher, Licit and Illicit Drugs.

52. Goodstadt, M.S., “Drug Education—A Tum On or a Turn Off?” Journal of Drug Education 10 (1980), 89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kerr, P., “Experts Say Some Antidrug Effort by Schools Harm More than Help,” The New YorkTimes (September 17, 1986), A1 and B6Google Scholar; Moskowitz, J.M., Malvin, J.H., Schaeffer, G.A. and Schaps, E., “An Experimental Evaluation of a Drug Education Course,” Journal of Drug Education 14 (1984), 9–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Royse, D., Keller, S. and Schwartz, J.L., “Lessons Learned: The Evaluation of a Drug Education Program,” Journal of Drug Education 12 (1982), 181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schaps, E., DiBartolo, R., Moskowitz, J., Palley, C.S. and Churgin, S., “A Review of 127 Drug Abuse Prevention Program Evaluations,” Journal of Drug Issues 11 (1981), 17–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schaps, E., Moskowitz, J.M., Condon, J.W. and Malvin, J.H., “Process and Outcome Evaluation of a Drug Education Course,” Journal of Drug Education 12 (1982), 353–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53. Levine, H.G., “The Discovery of Addiction: Changing Conceptions of Habitual Drunkenness in America,” Journal of Studies on Alcohol 39 (1978), 144CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Smart, and Ogborne, , Northern Spirits, 31Google Scholar.

54. Vancouver News Herald, September 13, 1944.

55. Cohen, S., “Adverse Effects of Cocaine,” Consumers Research Magazine 68 (1985), 14–16Google Scholar; See Erickson, , Adlaf, , Murray, and Smart, , The Steel Drug, 28–31Google Scholar; Gold, M.S., 800--Cocaine (Toronto: Bantam Books Inc., 1984)Google Scholar; Jones, H. and Jones, H., Sensual Drugs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977), 108Google Scholar; Knox, R.A., “‘Powerfully Addictive’ Cocaine,” Winnipeg Free Press (December 27, 1984), 23Google Scholar; McCormack, D., “Beware Cocaine Doctor Warns,” Toronto Star (May 5, 1984), F3Google Scholar.

56. Erickson, Adlaf, Murray and Smart, The Steel Drug; Erickson, P.G. and Alexander, B.K., “Cocaine and Addictive Liability: A Critical Review,” Manuscript submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar; Kandel, D.B., Murphy, D.S. and Karus, D., “Cocaine Use in Young Adult-hood: Patterns of Use and Psychosocial Correlates,” in Kozel, N. J. and Adas, E.H. (eds.), Cocaine Use in America: Epidemiologies and Clinical Perspectives, NIDA Research Monograph 61 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1985)Google Scholar; Peele, S., The Meaning of Addiction: Compulsive Experience and Its Interpretation (Lexington: D.C. Heath, 1985)Google Scholar; Waldorf, Murphy, Reinarman and Joyce, Doing Coke; Zinberg, N.E., Drug, Set and Setting: The Basis for Controlled Intoxicant Use (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984)Google Scholar.

57. Johnston, L.D., Bachman, J.G. and O'Malley, P.M., Student Drug Use in America 1975-1981, DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 82–1221 (Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1982)Google Scholar.

58. Blackwell, , “Drifting, Controlling and Overcoming,” 220Google Scholar.

59. Siegel, R.K., “Cocaine and the Privileged Class: A Review of Historical and Contemporary Images,” Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse 4 (1984), 37–49CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

60. Zinberg, Drug, Set and Setting.

61. Erickson and Alexander, “Cocaine and Addictive Liability.”

62. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., “Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science 185 (1974), 1124–1131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

63. Zinberg, , Drug, Set and Setting, 250–253Google Scholar; Erickson, , Adlaf, , Murray, and Smart, , The Steel Drug, 52Google Scholar.

64. Thompson, “The Beginning of our Regeneration.”

65. Hallowell, , Prohibition in Ontario, 1919-1923, 60Google Scholar.

66. Ibid., 19.

67. McClung, N., In Times Like These (Toronto: McLeod and Allen, 1915), 163Google Scholar.

68. Manitoba Free Press, March 6, 1916, 4.

69. The Globe and Mail, September 29, 1919, 8.

70. The Vancouver Sun, December 9, 1985.

71. McDonald, M., “A War on Cocaine,” Maclean's (August 4, 1986), 20Google Scholar.

72. Ward, D., “Kelleher Favours U.S. Get-Tough Drug Policy,” The Vancouver Sun (May 3, 1988), B1Google Scholar.

73. The Western Prairie, 1916, cited by Thompson, , “The Beginning of our Regeneration,” 294Google Scholar.

74. Thompson, , “The Beginning of our Regeneration,” 294Google Scholar.

75. The Globe and Mail, July 30, 1919, 8.

76. The Globe and Mail, September 29, 1919, 8.

77. The Globe and Mail, September 4, 1919, 6.

78. Toronto Evening Telegram, April 2, 1921, 26Google Scholar.

79. Bean-Bayog, M., Review of The Meaning of Addiction: Compulsive Experience and Its Interpretation in New England Journal of Medicine 314 (1986), 189–190Google Scholar; Bakalar, and Grinspoon, , Drug Control in a Free Society, 111Google Scholar; Graham, D., “Methadone Treatment in British Columbia: Bad Medicine?” Canadian Medical Association Journal 136 (1987), 564–566Google ScholarPubMed.

80. Boyd, N., “Why all this Hysteria about Drugs?” Letter to the Editor, The Province, September 17, 1986, 25Google Scholar.

81. Hager, E., “What's He Smoking?” Letter to the Editor, The Province, September 21, 1986, 30Google Scholar.

82. Hallowell, , Prohibition in Ontario 1919-1923, 28–29Google Scholar.

83. Attorney General of British Columbia cited by Victoria Times, March 9, 1921, 18.

84. The Daily Colonist, April 28, 1921; The Daily Colonist, October 20, 1922.

85. The Daily Colonist, April 28, 1921, 4.

86. Cited by The Daily Colonist, March 4, 1921, 1 and 4.

87. Gervais, C.H., The Rumrunners: A Prohibition Scrapbook (Thornhill, Ontario: Firefly Books, 1980), 122Google Scholar.

88. Ibid., 123.

89. Ibid., 124-125.

90. Hallowell, , Prohibition in Ontario 1919-1923, 121Google Scholar.

91. Solomon, R., Hammond, T. and Langdon, S., Drug and Alcohol Law for Canadians (2nd ed.; Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1986), 24Google Scholar.

92. Needham, P., “RCMP Drug Plot Called Scandalous,” The Vancouver Sun, July 3, 1986, A12Google Scholar.

93. Ibid.

94. Boyd, N., “The Supreme Court on Drugs: Masters of Reason in Disarray?” Canadian Lawyer 7 (1983), 6–10Google Scholar.

95. Robinson, M., “Innocent Couple Manhandled,” The Vancouver Sun, July 14, 1977, 2Google Scholar.

96. Ibid.

97. Trebach, A.S., The Great Drug War (New York, N. Y.: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1987), 299Google Scholar.

98. For a timetable see Smart and Ogborne, Northern Spirits.

99. Hadaway, P.F. and Beyerstein, B.L., “Then they came for the Smokers but I Didn't Speak up because I wasn't a Smoker: Legislation and Tobacco Use,” Canadian Psychology 28 (1987), 259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar.