Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T00:21:27.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robert Leckey Contextual Subjects: Family, State, and Relational Theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008, 355 p.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2014

Diana Majury  and
Anne Quéma
Diana Majury
Affiliation:
Department of Law, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON
Anne Quéma
Affiliation:
Department of English, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews/Comptes-Rendus
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , August 2010 , pp. 246 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

6 Nedelsky's use of childrearing as a metaphor to address the embedded individual and his or her relation to social structures can be interpreted as an earlier feminist attempt to blur this division by resorting to a gender-inflected and maternal discourse: Nedelsky, Jennifer, “Reconceiving Autonomy: Sources, Thoughts and Possibilities,” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1 (1989): 7–36, 12Google Scholar.

7 “One of the oldest feminist arguments is that women are not seen and defined as themselves, but in their relations to others”: Nedelsky, “Reconceiving Autonomy,” 9. Nedelsky goes on to refer to Simone de Beauvoir's concept of the Other.

8 “Contrary to the occasional claims of relational theorists, the context is not something to be examined in isolation from distinctly normative claims” (196).

9 See Smart, Carol, Law, Crime, and Sexuality (London: Sage, 1995)Google ScholarPateman, Carole, “Self-Ownership and Property in the Person: Democratization and a Tale of Two Concepts,” Journal of Political Philosophy 10, 1 (2002): 20–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.