Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:34:41.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The syllable boundary in generative phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Marc Picard
Marc Picard*
Affiliation:
L’Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières and McGill University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Natural Generative Phonology (NGP), the only phonological rules are those which describe alternations that take place in environments that can be specified in purely phonetic terms. As indicated by Hooper, these “‘phonetic terms’ refer to phonological features (that have intrinsic phonetic content) and phonological boundaries (that have a necessary and consistent phonetic manifestation)” (1976:14). Any rule which changes phonological features in an environment described in morphosyntactic or lexical terms is not phonological but morphophonemic. Since by definition a phonological rule cannot contain non-phonetic information, this entails, among other things, the exclusion of any boundary that is not determined by phonetic means. In other words, the syllable ($) and the pause (| |) are the only boundaries which can appear in a phonological rule in NGP. The word boundary (# and ##) and the morpheme boundary (+), which are determined by syntactic and semantic means, can only appear in a morphophonemic rule.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , Fall 1979 , pp. 119 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dell, F. (1970) Les règles phonologiques tardives et la morphologie dérivationnelle du français, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Dell, F. (1973) Les règles et les sons, Hermann.Google Scholar
Dumas, D. (1974a) “Durée vocalique et diphtongaison en francais québécois”, Cahier de Linguistique 4, 13–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumas, D. (1974b) “La fusion vocalique en francais québécois,” Montreal Working Papers 2, 23–50.Google Scholar
Entenman, G. (1977) The Development of Nasal Vowels, Texas Linguistic Forum.Google Scholar
Harms, R. (1968) Introduction to Phonological Theory, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. (1972) “The Syllable in Phonological Theory,” Language 48, 525–40.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. (1976) An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1975) Phonology: Theory and Analysis, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, M., Kisseberth, C., and Kim, C. (1975) An Introduction to Phonological Structure, unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Legaré, L. (1978) “Relâchement des voyelles hautes et reformulation,” Cahier de Linguistique 7, 31–42.Google Scholar
Lehn, W. (1963) “Emphasis in Cairo Arabic,” Language 39, 29–39.Google Scholar
Picard, M. (1974) “Reexamining Phonological Rules: Examples from French,” Montreal Working Papers 1, 123–32.Google Scholar
Picard, M. (1976) The Phonological History of Arapaho: A Study in Linguistic Change, Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University.Google Scholar
Picard, M. (1977) “Les règles morphophonémiques en diachronie,” Montreal Working Papers 8, 129–36.Google Scholar
Pope, M. (1966) From Latin to Modern French, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Schane, S. (1968) French Phonology and Morphology, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1972) “On the Theory of Syllabic Phonology,” Linguistische Berichte 18, 1–18.Google Scholar