No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Subclassification of Southern Wakashan
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 June 2016
Abstract
The Southern Wakashan (or Nootkan) languages exhibit a sort of chain relationship, from south to north: Makah, Nitinat, and Nootka. Given the intermediate geographic position of Nitinat with respect to Makah (situated more to the south) and Nootka (situated more to the north), one can ask which of these languages is most closely related to Nitinat. At present, this question remains unresolved, as reflected by the disagreement in the literature. Relying primarily on lexical data, but also considering aspects of sound changes and grammatical criteria, it is proposed that the closer grouping of Nitinat is with Makah.
Résumé
Les langues wakashannes (ou nootkannes) du sud entretiennent des rapports géographiques en chaîne, s’étalant du sud jusqu’au nord : le makah, le nitinat et le nootka. Étant donné la position géographiquement intermédiaire du nitinat par rapport au makah (situé plus au sud) et au nootka (situé plus au nord), on peut se demander laquelle de ces deux langues est la plus rapprochée du nitinat. À présent, cette question demeure non résolue, si on se fie au désaccord dans la littérature sur le sujet. En se basant essentiellement sur des données lexicales, et aussi sur certains aspects de changements phonologiques et de critères grammaticaux, il est ici proposé que le nitinat et le makah constituent le regroupement le plus rapproché.
- Type
- Part I: Historical Classification
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 52 , Issue 1-2: Southern Wakashan Languages , July 2007 , pp. 19 - 41
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2007
References
Andrade, Manuel J.
1933. Quileute. In Handbook of American Indian languages, Part 3, ed. Boas, Franz, 149–292. Glückstadt, Germany: J.J. Augustin.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1997. Mary R. Haas and historical linguistics. Anthropological Linguistics
39:642–667.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1999. Historical linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Embleton, Sheila M.
1985. Lexicostatistics applied to the Germanic, Romance, and Waka-shan families. Word
36:37–60.Google Scholar
Embleton, Sheila M.
1991. Mathematical methods of genetic classification. In Sprung from some common source: Investigations into the prehistory of languages, ed. Lamb, Sydney M. and Mitchell, E. Douglas, 365–388. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gamble, Geoffrey. 1977. Nootkan glottalized resonants in Nitinat: A case of lexical diffusion. In The lexicon in phonological change, ed. Wang, William S.-Y., 266–278. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Mary R.
1969. Internal reconstruction of the Nootka-Nitinat pronominal suffixes. International Journal of American Linguistics
35:108–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, William H. Jr., 1968. Traces of glottalized resonants in Makah. Paper read at the Linguistic Society of America annual meeting, New York.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William H. Jr., 1969. Origin of the Nootka pharyngeals. International Journal of American Linguistics
35:125–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, William H. Jr., 1971. Makah vowel insertion and loss. Paper read at the 6th International Conference on Salish Languages, Victoria, BC.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William H. Jr., 1973. The pattern of Makah pronouns. Paper read at the 8th International Conference on Salish Languages, Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William H. Jr., 1979a. Noun and verb in Nootkan. In The Victoria Conference on Northwestern Languages: Victoria, BC, November 4-5 1976, ed. Efrat, Barbara S., 83–155. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Provincial Museum.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William H. Jr., 1979b. Wakashan comparative studies. In The languages of Native America: Historical and comparative assessment, ed. Campbell, Lyle and Mithun, Marianne, 766–791. Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, William H. Jr., 1996. ‘Hardening’ and ‘softening’ in Makah. Paper read at the 31st International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William H. Jr., 1997. Mary R. Haas’s contributions to Wakashan linguistics. Anthropological Linguistics
39:569–577.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William H. Jr., 1999. The Makah velar increment. Paper read at the 34th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, Kamloops, BC.Google Scholar
Kinkade, M. Dale. 1985. More on nasal loss on the Northwest Coast. International Journal of American Linguistics
51: 478–180.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Paul D.
1997. Wh-question particles in some languages of the Southern Northwest Coast. Paper read at the 32nd International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, Port Angeles, WA.Google Scholar
Powell, Jay, ed. 1991. Our world, our ways: T’aat’aaqsapa cultural dictionary. Port Alberai, BC: Nuu-chah-nulth Tribal Council.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward, and Swadesh, Morris. 1939. Nootka texts: Tales and ethnological narratives with grammatical notes and lexical materials. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Mary Haas, and Swadesh, Morris. 1933. A visit to the other world, a Nitinat text (with translation and grammatical analysis). International Journal of American Linguistics
7:195–208.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1959. The mesh principle in comparative linguistics. Anthropological Linguistics
1(2):7–14.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence C., and Thompson, M. Terry. 1972. Language universals, nasals, and the Northwest Coast. In Studies in linguistics in honor of George L. Trager, ed. Smith, M. Estellie, 441–456. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Touchie, Bernice Naʕlna. 1977. Nitinaht. International Journal of American Linguistics Native American Texts Series
2(3):69–97.Google Scholar