Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T22:00:47.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Core-Consistency and Total Inclusion for Methods of Summability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

G. G. Lorentz
Affiliation:
Wayne University
A. Robinson
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We shall consider methods of summation A, B, … defined by matrices of real elements (amn), (bmn), (m, n = 1, 2, …) which are regular, that is, have the three well-known properties of Toeplitz (4, p. 43). A method A is said to be core-consistent with the methodBfor bounded sequences if the A-core (3, p. 137; and 4, p. 55) of each real bounded sequence is contained in its B-core. B is totally included in A, B ≪A, if each real sequence which is B-summable to a definite limit (this limit may be finite or infinite of a definite sign) is also A-summable to the same limit.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1954

References

1. Agnew, R. P., Cores of complex sequences and of their transforms, Amer. J. Math. 61 (1939), 178–186.Google Scholar
2. Basu, S. K., On the total relative strength of the Hölder and Cesàro methods, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2), 50 (1949), 447–462.Google Scholar
3. Cooke, R. G., Infinite matrices and sequence spaces (London, 1950).Google Scholar
4. Hardy, G. H., Divergent series (Oxford, ).Google Scholar
5. Hurwitz, W. A., Some properties of methods of evaluation of divergent sequences, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2), 26 (1926), 231–248.Google Scholar
6. Knopp, K., Zur Theorie der Limitierungsverfahren. Math. Zeitschrift, 31 (1929-30), pp. 97–127, 276–305.Google Scholar
7. Krein, M. G. and Rutman, M. A., Linear operators leaving invariant a cone in a Banach space, Uspehi Mat. Nauk (N.S.), 3, no 23 (1948), 3–95; Amer. Math. Soc. Translations no. 26 (1950).Google Scholar