Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T19:47:30.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dedekind Completeness and a Fixed-Point Theorem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

E. S. Wolk*
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

McShane (5, 6) has introduced the concept of “Dedekind completeness” for partially ordered sets, which seems to be a natural generalization of the usual concept of completeness for lattices. It is the purpose of this paper to discuss some of the properties of Dedekind completeness, particularly with respect to a rather natural class of partially ordered sets which we call “uniform.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1957

References

1. Birkhoff, G., Lattice theory, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloquium Publications, 25 (1948).Google Scholar
2. Bourbaki, N., Sur le théorème de Zorn, Archiv. der Math., 6 (1949-50), 434437.Google Scholar
3. Davis, Anne C., A characterization of complete lattices, Pacific J. Math., 5 (1955), 311319.Google Scholar
4. MacNeille, H., Partially ordered sets, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 42 (1937), 416460.Google Scholar
5. McShane, E. J., Order-preserving maps and integration processes, Annals of Math. Studies, 31 (Princeton, 1953).Google Scholar
6. McShane, E. J., Partial orderings and Moore-Smith limits, Amer. Math. Monthly, 59 (1952), 111.Google Scholar
7. Tarski, A., A lattice-theoretical fixpoint theorem and its applications, Pacific J. Math. 5 (1955), 285309.Google Scholar