Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T16:51:15.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Criterion of Stasheff

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In (9), Stasheff showed that a loop space ΩX is homotopy-commutative if and only if the map e∇ : ΣΩX ∨ ΣΩXX may be extended to ΣΩX × ΣΩX, where ∇ is the folding map and e:ΣΩXX is the map whose adjoint is the identity map of ΩX. In (5), Ganea, Hilton, and Peterson showed that this criterion does not dualize. Our aim in this paper is to give a reformulation of Stasheff's criterion, which is equivalent to it, but in a form which does dualize. In the course of the paper, we shall discuss why Stasheff's criterion, in its original form, does not dualize. In (5), the authors have, of course, given an explicit counterexample to the dual of StashefFs criterion in its original form.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1969

References

1. Arkowitz, M., 77*e generalized Whitehead product, Pacific J. Math. 12 (1962), 723.Google Scholar
2. Arkowitz, M., Homotopy products for H-spaces, Michigan Math. J. 10 (1963), 19.Google Scholar
3. Arkowitz, M., Commutators and cup products, Illinois J. Math. 8 (1964), 571581.Google Scholar
4. Berstein, I. and Ganea, T., Homotopical nilpotency, Illinois J. Math. 5 (1961), 99130.Google Scholar
5. Berstein, I. and Hilton, P. J., On suspensions and comultiplications, Topology 2 (1963), 7382.Google Scholar
6. Ganea, T., Hilton, P. J., and Peterson, F. P., On the homotopy-commutativity of loop-spaces and suspensions, Topology 1 (1962), 133141.Google Scholar
7. Hilton, P. J., Homotopy theory and duality (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965).Google Scholar
8. Hoo, C. S., A note on a theorem of Ganea, Hilton and Peterson, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 19 (1968), 909911.Google Scholar
9. Stasheff, J., On homotopy-dbelian H-spaces, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 57 (1961), 734745.Google Scholar