Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T04:57:56.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stability and Categoricity of Lattices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Kenneth W. Smith
Kenneth W. Smith*
Affiliation:
Logistics Department, Imperial Oil Limited, Toronto, Ontario
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper is a contribution to applied stability theory. Our purpose is to investigate the complexity of lattices by determining the stability of their first order theories.

Stability measures the complexity of a theory T by counting the number of different “kinds” of elements in models of T. The notion of ω-stability was introduced by Morley [26] in 1965 and generalized by Shelah [31] in 1969. Shelah classified all first order theories according to their stability properties.

Stability and -categoricity are closely related (see [26] and [1]). In fact, the notions of stable, superstable and ω-stable can be regarded as successive approximations of -categorical. -categoricity is a very strong property while stability, superstability and ω-stability facilitate the classification of more “complex” theories.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , 01 December 1981 , pp. 1380 - 1419
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1981

References

1. Baldwin, J. T. and Lachlan, A. H., On strongly minimal sets, J. Symbolic Logic 36 (1971), 79–96.Google Scholar
2. Barwise, J., Back and forth through infinitary logic, in: Studies in model theory, Math. Assoc. Amer., Buffalo (1973), 5–34.Google Scholar
3. Barwise, J., Handbook of mathematical logic, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977).Google Scholar
4. Chang, C. C. and Keisler, H. J., Model theory, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973).Google Scholar
5. Cherlin, G., Model theoretic algebra—selected topics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 521 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976).Google Scholar
6. Dickmann, M. A., Large infinitary languages, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975).Google Scholar
7. Dushnik, B. and Miller, E. W., Partially ordered sets. Amer. J. Math. 63 (1941), 600–610.Google Scholar
8. Eklof, P. C. and Fisher, E. R., The elementary theory of abelian groups, Annals Math. Logic 4 (1972), 115–171.Google Scholar
9. Ehrenfeucht, A., An application of games to the completeness problem for formalized theories, Fund. Math. 49 (1961), 129–141.Google Scholar
10. Feferman, S. and Vaught, R. L., The first order properties of products of algebraic systems, Fund. Math. 47 (1959), 57–103.Google Scholar
11. Fennemore, C. F., All varieties of bands I and II, Math. Nach. 48 (1971), 237–262.Google Scholar
12. Fraïssé, R., Sur quelques classifications des systèmes de relations, Publ. Sci. Univ. Alger. Sér. A, 1 (1954), 35–182.Google Scholar
13. Gerhard, J. A., The lattice of equational classes of idempotent semigroups, J. Algebra 15 (1970), 195–224.Google Scholar
14. Grätzer, G., Universal algebra, (D. Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1968).Google Scholar
15. Hanf, W., Model-theoretic methods in the study of elementary logic, in: The theory of models, Proceedings of the 1963 International Symposium at Berkley (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965), 132–145.Google Scholar
16. Harnik, V., On the existence of saturated models of stable theories, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 52 (1975), 361–367.Google Scholar
17. Howie, J. M., An introduction to semigroup theory, (Academic Press, London, 1976).Google Scholar
18. Keisler, H. J., Fundamentals of model theory, in: Handbook of mathematical logic (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977), 47–103.Google Scholar
19. Kelley, D. and Rival, I., Planar lattices, Can. J. Math. 27 (1975), 636–665.Google Scholar
20. Kunen, K., Combinatorics, in: Handbook of mathematical logic (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977), 371–402.Google Scholar
21. Lachlan, A. H., On the number of countable models of a countable superstable theory, in: Logic, methodology and philosophy of science IV (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973), 45–56.Google Scholar
22. Lachlan, A. H., Two conjectures regarding the stability of ω-categorical theories, Fund. Math. 81 (1974), 133–145.Google Scholar
23. Macintyre, A., On ω1-categorical theories of abelian groups, Fund. Math. 70 (1971), 253–270.Google Scholar
24. Mekler, A. and Smith, K. W., Superstable graphs, Not. Amer. Math. Soc. (1979), 79T–E15. Google Scholar
25. Monk, J. D., Mathematical logic, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
26. Morley, M., Categoricity in power. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 114 (1965), 514–538.Google Scholar
27. Olin, P., Logical properties of V-free products of bands, preprint.Google Scholar
28. Olin, P. and Smith, K. W., Stability and the underlying semilattice of a band, preprint.Google Scholar
29. Petrich, M., A construction and a classification of bands, Math. Nach. 48 (1971), 263–274.Google Scholar
30. Podewski, K. and Ziegler, M., Stable graphs, Fund. Math. 100 (1978), 101–107.Google Scholar
31. Shelah, S., Stable theories, Israel J. Math. 7 (1969), 187–202.Google Scholar
32. Shelah, S., Finite diagram stable in power, Annals Math. Logic 2 (1970), 69–118.Google Scholar
33. Shelah, S., Stability, the f.c.p. and superslability, Annals Math. Logic 3 (1971), 271–362.Google Scholar
34. Smith, K. W., Stability and categoricity of lattices of height four, Not. Amer. Math. Soc. (1978), 78T–E49.Google Scholar
35. Smith, K. W., Stability of lattices of finite height, Not. Amer. Math. Soc. (1979), 79T–E9.Google Scholar
36. Smith, K. W., Stability of lattices, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto (1979).Google Scholar
37. Wierzejewski, J., Remarks on stability and saturated models, Coll. Math. 34 (1976), 165–169.Google Scholar