Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:38:55.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neurosciences in the Third Reich: from Ivory Tower to Death Camps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2019

Michael I. Shevell
Michael I. Shevell*
Affiliation:
Divison of Pediatric Neurology, Montreal Children's Hospital, and the Departments of Neurology/Neurosurgery and Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
*
Reprint requests to: Dr. Michael Shevell, Room A-514, Montreal Children's Hospital, 2300 Tupper Street, Montreal, Quebec H3H 1P3
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is commonly thought that the horrific medical abuses occurring during the era of the Third Reich were limited to fringe physicians acting in extreme locales such as the concentration camps. However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that there was a widespread perversion of medical practice and science that extended to mainstream academic physicians. Scientific thought, specifically the theories of racial hygiene, and the political conditions of a totalitarian dictatorship, acted symbiotically to devalue the intrinsic worth to society of those individuals with mental and physical disabilities. This devaluation served to foster the medical abuses which occurred. Neurosciences in the Third Reich serves as a backdrop to highlight what was the slippery slope of medical practice during that era. Points on this slippery slope included the “dejudification” of medicine, unethical experimentation in university clinics, systematic attempts to sterilize and euthanasize targeted populations, the academic use of specimens obtained through such programs and the experimental atrocities within the camps.

Résumé:

Résumé:

On croit en général que les abus médicaux horribles commis sous le troisième Reich ont été commis par des médecins marginaux agissant dans des lieux exceptionnels tels les camps de concentration. Cependant, il est de plus en plus évident qu'il y a eu une perversion répandue de la pratique médicale et de la science qui s'étendait aux médecins du milieu académique. La pensée scientifique, spécifiquement les théories de l'hygiène racial, et les conditions politiques d'une dictature totalitaire ont agi en symbiose pour dévaluer pour la société la valeur intrinsèque des individus ayant une incapacité physique ou mentale. Cette dévaluation a servi à encourager les abus médicaux qui ont été perpétrés. Les neurosciences sous le troisième Reich seront utilisées comme toile de fond pour illustrer la pente glissante de la pratique médicale à cette époque. La "déjuification" de la médecine, l'expérimentation non éthique dans les cliniques universitaires, les tentatives systématiques de stérilisation et d'euthanasie de populations ciblées, l'utilisation en milieu académique de spécimens obtenus par ces programmes et les atrocités expérimentales dans les camps des points de repère sur cette pente glissante.

Type
Historical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , May 1999 , pp. 132 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 1999

References

1. Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10; Military Tribunal, Case 1, United States v. Brandt, Karl et al., December 1946-August 1947. Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1950.Google Scholar
2. Mitscherlich, A, Mielke, F. Doctors of infamy: the story of the Nazi medical crimes. New York: Henry Schuman Publishing, 1949.Google Scholar
3. Caplan, AL. How did medicine go so wrong? In: Caplan, AL, ed. When medicine went mad: bioethics and the Holocaust. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1992: 53–92.Google Scholar
4. Seidelman, WE. Nuremberg lamentation: for the forgotten victims of medical science. Br Med J 1996; 313: 1463–1467.Google Scholar
5. Proctor, RN. Political biology: doctors in the Nazi cause. In: Racial Hygiene-Medicine Under the Nazis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988: 64–94.Google Scholar
6. Proctor, RN. Origins of racial hygiene. In: Racial Hygiene-Medicine Under the Nazis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988: 10–45.Google Scholar
7. Alexander, L. Medical science under dictatorship. N Engl J Med 1949; 221: 39–47.Google Scholar
8. Alexander, L. Foreword. In: Mitscherlich, A, Mielke, F. Doctors of infamy: the story of the Nazi medical crimes. New York: Henry Schuman Publishing, 1949: 29–34.Google Scholar
9. Macklin, R. Which way down the slippery slope? Nazi killing and euthanasia today. In: Caplan, AL, ed. When Medicine Went Mad: Bioethics and the Holocaust. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1992: 173–200.Google Scholar
10. Shevell, MI. Neurology’s witness to history: The Combined Intelligence Operative Sub-Committee Reports of Leo Alexander. Neurology 1996; 47: 1096–1103.Google Scholar
11. Shevell, MI. Neurology’s witness to history (Part II): Leo Alexander’s contributions to the Nuremberg Code (1946 to 1947). Neurology 1998; 50: 274–278.Google Scholar
12. Alexander, L. The medical school curriculum in wartime Germany. CIOS, Item No. 24, File No. XXVII–71, 1–21.Google Scholar
13. Alexander, L. Methods of influencing international scientific meetings as laid down by German scientific organizations. CIOS, Item No. 24, File No. XXVIII–8, 1–32.Google Scholar
14. Alexander, L. Miscellaneous aviation medical matters. CIOS, Item No. 24, File No. XXIX–21, 1–165.Google Scholar
15. Alexander, L. The treatment of shock from prolonged exposure to cold, especially in water. CIOS, Item No. 24, File No. XXVI–37, 1–228.Google Scholar
16. Alexander, L. Public mental health practices in Germany: sterilization and execution of patients suffering from nervous or mental disease. CIOS, Item No. 24, File No. XXVIII–50, 1–173.Google Scholar
17. Alexander, L. Neuropathology and neurophysiology, including electroencephalography, in wartime Germany. CIOS, Item No. 24, File No. XXVII–1, 1–65.Google Scholar
18. Alexander, L. German military neuropsychiatry and neurosurgery. CIOS, Items No. 24, File No. XXVIII–49, 1–138.Google Scholar
19. Peiffer, J. Neuropathology in the Third Reich. Brain Pathol 1991; 1: 125–131.Google Scholar
20. Peiffer, J. Hirnforschung im Zwielicht: Beispiele verführbarer Wissenschaft aus der Zeit des Nationalsozialismus. Husum: Matthiesen Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar
21. Friedlander, S. Nazi Germany and the Jews: Years of Persecution, 1933–1939 (Vol 1). New York: Harper Collins, 1997.Google Scholar
22. Proctor, RN. Anti-Semitism in the German medical community. In: Racial Hygiene-Medicine Under the Nazis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988: 131–176.Google Scholar
23. Peiffer, J. Die Vertreibung deutscher Neuropathologen 1933–1939. Nervenarzt 1998; 69: 99–109.Google Scholar
24. Fischer, E. Die Fortschritte der menschlichen Erblehre als Grundlage eugenischer Bevölkerungspolitik. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1933; 59: 1069–1070.Google Scholar
25. Ramm, R. Ärztliche Rechts-und Standeskunde, der Arzt als Gesundheitserzieher (2nd ed) Berlin: W de Gruyter, 1943.Google Scholar
26. Proctor, RN. The sterilization law. In: Racial Hygiene-Medicine Under the Nazis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988: 95–117.Google Scholar
27. Klee, E. Euthanasie im NS-Staat, Die “Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens”, Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch-Verlag, 1983.Google Scholar
28. Hoche, A, Binding, R. Die Freigabe der Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens. Leipzig: F Meiner, 1920.Google Scholar
29. Parent, S, Shevell, MI. The ‘first to perish’: child euthanasia in the Third Reich. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998; 152: 79–86.Google Scholar
30. Friedlander, H. Killing handicapped adults. In: The Origins of Nazi Genocide; From Euthanasia to the Final Solution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995: 62–85.Google Scholar
31. Burleigh, M. Death and Deliverance: Euthanasia in Germany 1900–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 93–129.Google Scholar
32. Proctor, RN. The destruction of “lives not worth living.” In: Racial Hygiene-Medicine Under the Nazis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988: 177–222.Google Scholar
33. Peiffer, J. Neuropathological use of the brains of murdered victims of Nazi Euthanasia. (Submitted).Google Scholar
34. Shevell, MI, Evans, BK. The “Schaltenbrand experiment,” Würzburg, 1940: Scientific, historical, and ethical perspectives. Neurology 1994; 44: 350–356.Google Scholar
35. Schaltenbrand file, Berlin Document Center, Berlin.Google Scholar
36. Schaltenbrand, G. Nachweis eines Virus als Ursache des übertragbaren Markscheidenschwundes. Klin Wochenschr 1940; 10: 840–841.Google Scholar
37. Schaltenbrand, G. Die Multiple Sklerose des Menschen. Leipzig, Georg Thieme, 1943.Google Scholar
38. Rathofer, E. Archiv Institut für Zeitgeschichte (München), personal communication.Google Scholar
39. Innes, JRM, Kurland, LT. Is multiple sclerosis caused by a virus? Am J Med 1952; 12: 574–585.Google Scholar
40. Sass, HM. Reichsrundschreiben 1931: pre-Nuremberg German regulations concerning new therapy and human experimentation. J Med Philos 1983; 8: 99–111.Google Scholar
41. Grodin, MA. Historical origins of the Nuremberg Code. In: Annas, GJ, Grodin, MA, eds. The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992: 121–144.Google Scholar
42. Anonymous. Book review – Die Multiple Sklerose des Menschen. Arch Neurol Psychiat 1950; 63: 190.Google Scholar
43. Bailey, P. Letter to the editor. Arch Neurol Psychiat 1950; 63: 790.Google Scholar
44. Shevell, MI. Racial hygiene, active euthanasia, and Julius Hallervorden. Neurology 1992; 42: 2214–2219.Google Scholar
45. Muller-Hill, B. Interview with Werner-Joachim Eicke. In: Murderous Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988: 159.Google Scholar
46. Bundesarchiv, Koblenz, R73–11449.Google Scholar
47. Je mehr, Aly G., desto lieber. Über den umgang mit Präparaten von Nazi-Opfern vor 1945 und danach. Die Zeit 1989; 10: 21–22.Google Scholar
48. Hallervorden, J. Ueber eine Kohlenoxydvergiftung im Fetalleben mit Entwicklungsstörung der Hirnrinde. Allg Z Psychiatr 1949; 124: 289–298.Google Scholar
49. Mitscherelich, A, Mielke, F. Experiments involving high altitude (subjection to low pressure), low temperature, and the drinking of sea water. In: Mitscherlich, A, Mielke, F. Doctors of Infamy: the Story of the Nazi Medical Crimes. New York: Henry Schumann Publishing, 1949: 4–41.Google Scholar
50. Berger, RL. Nazi science – the Dachau hypothermia experiment. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1435–1440.Google Scholar
51. Lifton, RJ. Participants. In: The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide. New York: Basic Books, 1986: 103–133.Google Scholar
52. Muller-Hill, B. Nine questions. In: Murderous Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988: 88–106.Google Scholar
53. Bartels, F. Internationales Ärztliches Bulletin 1935: 124–125.Google Scholar
54. Kater, MH. Doctors under Hitler. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1989.Google Scholar
55. Lifton, RJ. Doubling: the Faustian bargain. In: The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide. New York: Basic Books, 1986: 418–465.Google Scholar
56. Alexander, L. War crimes and their motivation. J Criminal Law Criminology 1948; 39: 298–326.Google Scholar
57. Seidelman, WE. “Medspeak” for murder: the Nazi experience and the culture of medicine. In: Caplan, AL, ed. When Medicine Went Mad: Bioethics and the Holocaust. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1992: 271–279.Google Scholar