Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T11:35:16.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time, Modernity, and Destructive Habits of Thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Extract

The notion of time seems to be politically quite neutral, merely a concept of something that exists in much the same way that the weather exists. We can, of course, adopt different attitudes to the weather, but there does not seem to be any great political relevance in those attitudes. Yet when one thinks about the nature of time it is clear that attitudes to it are important socially. If one experiences time as a container that inexorably directs our lives in particular ways, because we are in it, we shall place little reliance on our individual efforts to accomplish anything that runs contrary to what is often called the “river of time.” What are often called pre-modem attitudes to time are taken to be characterized in this way, where agents were ultimately pessimistic of their ability to do anything really different. In the words of Kohelet in the Bible, “There is nothing new under the sun” (Ecclesiastes1:9). That is taken to mean that there is pattern to what takes place in our world, and that pattern is beyond the power of human beings to alter.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 What is Enlightenment?’ in The Foucault Reader, ed. Rabinow, P. (New York: Pantheon, 1984), 40Google Scholar.

2 Foucault Live (Interviews, 1966-84), trans. Johnston, J. (New York: Semiotext(e), 1989), 251Google Scholar.

3 As brilliantly represented in many of the plays of Arthur Miller and David Mamet.

4 Sartre, J-P.L'Être et le Néant: Essai d'ontologie phénomenologique (Paris: Gallimard, 1943)Google Scholar; trans. Barnes, H.Being and Nothingness: An Essay of Phenomenological Ontology (New York: Philosophical Library, 1956)Google Scholar.

5 Wittgenstein, L.Wittgenstein's Lectures, Cambridge, 1932-1935 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979), 160Google Scholar.

6 Foucault, M.Theatrum Philosophicum,Critique 282 (1970): 891Google Scholar.

7 A more extended discussion of this point can be found in the chapter ‘The Holocaust’ in my Evil and Suffering in Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 185-219.

8 Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (London: Routledge, 1922), 6.43.

9 For more detail on this particular argument see Nasr, S. & Leaman, O. eds., History of Islamic Philosophy (New York: Routledge, 1996)Google Scholar, passim.