Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T20:28:33.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Federalization of Immigration and Integration in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2014

Mireille Paquet
Mireille Paquet*
Affiliation:
Concordia University
*
Department of Political Science, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West, H-1225.22, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaH3G 1M8, email: Mireille.paquet@concordia.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Between 1990 and 2010, a gradual process of institutional change has affected Canada's immigration and integration governance regime. The central characteristic of this process is the emergence of a new legitimate institutional group of actors: Canadian provinces. This change corresponds to a federalization of Canada's immigration and integration governance regime. It is a break from the previous pattern of federal dominance and provincial avoidance. It is not the result of diminished federal intervention in immigration and cannot be explained by exogenous shocks. Current explanations of this evolution focus on federal decisions and have trouble explaining provincial mobilization. Using a mechanistic approach to the analysis of social processes and insights on gradual institutional changes, this article demonstrates that provinces have been the central agents bringing about the federalization of Canada's immigration and integration governance regime between 1990 and 2010. Via a mechanism of province building centred on immigration, provinces have triggered and maintained in movement a decentralizing mechanism. The interactions of these two mechanisms, over time, gave rise to the federalization of immigration and integration in Canada.

Résumé

Entre 1990 et 2010, un processus de changement institutionnel graduel a affecté le régime de gouvernance de l'immigration et de l'intégration du Canada. La caractéristique centrale de ce processus est l'émergence d'un nouveau groupe d'acteurs institutionnel en matière d'immigration et d'intégration : les provinces canadiennes. En ce sens, ce changement correspond à une fédéralisation du régime de gouvernance de l'immigration et de l'intégration du Canada. L'émergence des provinces représente une rupture d'avec les pratiques contemporaines, caractérisées par la domination du gouvernement fédéral et la passivité, voire même l'évitement, des provinces. Ce changement n'est pas le résultat d'une diminution des activités du gouvernement fédéral en la matière tout comme il ne peut pas être expliqué par quelconque choc exogène. Les explications actuelles de cette évolution se concentrent sur les décisions fédérales et ont ainsi du mal à expliquer la mobilisation provinciale en immigration et en intégration. En utilisant une approche mécanistique pour l'analyse des processus sociaux et les apports sur les changements institutionnels graduels, cet article démontre que les provinces ont été les principaux agents de changements au sein du régime de gouvernance de l'immigration et de l'intégration du Canada entre 1990 et 2010. L'analyse empirique démontre que la fédéralisation est le résultat d'un processus enclenché et maintenu en mouvement par un mécanisme de construction provinciale, centré sur l'immigration, lui-même affectant des dynamiques de décentralisation au cours de cette période.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 519 - 548
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Laban, Yasmeen. 2004. “Jean Chrétien's Immigration Legacy.” Review of Constitutional Studies 9: 133–49.Google Scholar
Abu-Laban, Yasmeen and Gabriel, Christina. 2002. Selling Diversity. Immigration, Multiculturalism, Employment Equity, and Globalization. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Abu-Laban, Yasmeen and Garber, Judith A.. 2005. “The Construction of the Geography of Immigration as a Policy Problem.” Urban Affairs Review 40: 520–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ancelovici, Marcos and Jenson, Jane. 2012. “La Standardisation et les mécanismes du transfert transnational.” Gouvernement et action publique 1: 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Michael M., Béland, Daniel, Marchildon, Gregory P., McNutt, Kathleen, Phillips, Peter W.B. and Rasmussen, Ken. 2013. Governance and Public Policy in Canada: A View from the Provinces. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Banting, Keith. 1995. “The Welfare State as Statecraft: Territorial Politics and Canadian Social Policy.” In European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration, ed. Leibfried, S. and Pierson, P.. Washington: The Brookings Institution. 269–300.Google Scholar
Banting, Keith. 2005. “Canada: Nation-Building in a Federal Welfare State.” In Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European Experiences, ed. Obinger, H., Leibfried, S. and Castles, Frank G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 89–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banting, Keith. 2012. “Remaking Immigration: Asymmetric Decentralization and Canadian Federalism.” In Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness and Legitimacy, ed. Bakvis, H. and Skogstad, G.. Don Mills ON: Oxford University Press. 261–81.Google Scholar
Beach, Derek and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. 2012. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Becklumb, Penny. 2008. Immigration: The Canada-Quebec Accord. Ottawa: Library of Parliament.Google Scholar
Benz, Arthur and Broschek, Jörg. 2013. Federal Dynamics: Continuity, Change, and the Varieties of Federalism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biles, John. 2008. “Integration Policies in English-Speaking Canada.” In Immigration and Integration in Canada in the Twenty-First Century, ed. Biles, J., Burstein, M. and Frideres, J.. Montréal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press. 139–86.Google Scholar
Biles, John, Tolley, Erin, Andrew, Caroline, Esses, Victoria and Burstein, Meyer. 2011. “Integration and Inclusion in Ontario: The Sleeping Giant Stirs.” In Integration and Inclusion of Newcomers and Minorities across Canada, ed. Tolley, E., Biles, J., Vineberg, R., Burstein, M. and Frideres, J.. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Edwin R., and Cairns, Alan C.. 1966. “A Different Perspective on Canadian Federalism.” Canadian Public Administration 9 (1): 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Jerome H. and Hagen, David. 1994. “Québec Immigration Politics and Policy: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives.” In Québec: State and Society, ed. Gagnon, A.-G.. 2nd ed. Toronto: Nelson.Google Scholar
Boismenu, Gérard and Graefe, Peter. 2004. “The New Federal Tool Belt: Attempts to Rebuild Social Policy Leadership.” Canadian Public Policy 30: 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgon, J. 2009. Program Review, the Government of Canada's Experience Eliminating the Deficit, 1994–1999: A Canadian Case Study. Waterloo: Centre for international Governance Innovation.Google Scholar
Brodie, Janine. 1990. The Political Economy of Canadian Regionalism. Toronto: Hancourt Brave Jovanovich Canada.Google Scholar
Cairns, A.C. 1977. “The Governments and Societies of Canadian Federalism.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 10: 695–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, Robert D. 1992. “Natural Resources and Canadian Federalism: Decentralization, Recurring Conflict, and Resolution.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 22: 55–70.Google Scholar
Canada. 1993. Consultations sur l'immigration. Ottawa: Ministère de l'Emploi et de l'Immigration.Google Scholar
Canada 1994a. “Into the 21st Century : A Strategy for Immigration and Citizenship.” Ottawa: Citizenship and Immigration.Google Scholar
Canada. 1994b. “Settlement Renewal : A New Direction for Newcomer Integration.” Ottawa: Citizenship and Immigration.Google Scholar
Canada. 1995. “A Broader Vision. Immigration and Citizenship Plan 1995–2000. Annual Report to Parliament.” Ottawa: Citizenship and Immigration.Google Scholar
Canada. 1996. “Departmental Outlook on Program Expenditures and Priorities 96/97–98/99,” Ottawa: Citizenship and Immigration.Google Scholar
Canada 2005. The Canada-Ontario Immigration Agreement. Ottawa: Citizenship and Immigration Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. 2011a. Facts and Figures 2010: Immigration Overview—Permanent and Temporary Residents. Ottawa: Citizenship and Immigration Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. 2011b. Evaluation of the Provincial Nominee Program. Ottawa: Department of Citizenship and Immigration Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. 2012a “Government of Canada to Strengthen Responsibility for Integration of Newcomers “Integration Services Are About Nation Building,” Says Kenney.” Ottawa: Citizenship and Immigration Canada, http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/ministere/media/communiques/2012/2012-04-12.asp (April 28, 2012).Google Scholar
Canada. 2012b. “Backgrounder — Joint Federal-Provincial-erritorial Vision for Immigration.” Ottawa: Citizenship and Immigration Canada, http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/ministere/media/documents-info/2012/2012-11-16.asp (May 20, 2013)Google Scholar
Canada. 2012c. “Backgrounder — New Minimum Language Requirements for Immigrants Under the Provincial Nominee Program.” Ottawa: Citizenship and Immigration Canada, http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/DEPARTMENT/media/backgrounders/2012/2012-04-11.asp (May 17, 2013)Google Scholar
CBC. 2011. “Ontario Needs Greater Control over Immigration: Mcguinty.” CBC Toronto, April 20.Google Scholar
CBC. 2012. “Immigrants will miss local officers' help, critics say.” CBC Sudbury, April 16.Google Scholar
Chorney, H. and Hansen, P.. 1985. “Neo-Conservatism, Social Democracy and Province Building: The Experience of Manitoba.” Revue canadienne de sociologie 22: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clement, Gerald L. 2003. “The Manitoba Experience.” In Canadian Immigration Policy for the 21st Century, ed. Beach, C. M., Green, A. G. and Reitz, J. G.. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Courchene, Thomas J. 2004. “Social Policy and the Knowledge Economy: New Century, New Paradigm.” Policy Options 25: 30–36.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, Ainslie. 2012. “Premiers Discussed Nation-Wide Energy Strategy.” The Whitehorse Star, May 30: 7.Google Scholar
DeParle, Jason. 2010. “Defying Trend, Canada Lures More Migrants.” The New York Times, November 12, A1.Google Scholar
Dirks, Gerald E. 1995. Controversy and Complexity. Canadian Immigration Policy During the 1980s. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrowolsky, A. 2012. “Nuancing Neoliberalism: Lessons Learned from a Failed Immigration Experiment.” Journal of International Migration and Integration. 14.2: 197–218.Google Scholar
Dosanjh, Ujjal. 1996. Hansard of the British Columbia Legislative Assembly. 1st Session, 36th Parliament, June 27, 1996: 62.Google Scholar
Dosanjh, Ujjal. 1997. Hansard of the British Columbia Legislative Assembly. 2nd Session, 36th Parliament, April 27, 1997: 2907.Google Scholar
Dosanjh, Ujjal. 1998. Hansard of the British Columbia Legislative Assembly. 33rd Session, 36th Parliament, May 19, 1999: 7876.Google Scholar
Elkins, David J., and Simeon, Richard. 1980. Small Worlds : Provinces and Parties in Canadian Political Life. Toronto Methuen.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G. 2005. “A Sequential Theory of Decentralization: Latin American Cases in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 99: 327–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G. 2010. Decentralization and Subnational Politics in Latin America: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G. and Lynch, Julia F.. 2008. “From Process to Mechanism: Varieties of Disaggregation.” Qualitative Sociology 31: 333–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G. and Lynch, Julia F.. 2009. “Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 42: 1143–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filmon, Gary. 1995. Hansard of the Manitoba Legislative Assembly. 1st Session, 36th Legislature, Volume 8, June 1, 1995: 1750.Google Scholar
Gagnon, Alain-G. and Iacovino, Raffaele. 2007. Federalism, Citizenship and Quebec. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Garcea, Joseph. 1991. “The Immigration Clause in the Meech Lake Accord.” Manitoba Law Journal 21: 274.Google Scholar
Garcea, Joseph. 1994. “Federal-Provincial Relations in Immigration, 1971–1991: A Case Study of Asymmetrical Federalism.” Doctoral dissertation. Carleton University. Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
George, A.L. and Bennett, A.. 2004. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2008. “The Mechanismic Worldview: Thinking inside the Box.” British Journal of Political Science 38: 161–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graefe, Peter and Bourns, Andrew. 2009. “The Gradual Defederalization of Canadian Health Policy.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 39: 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Alan G. and Green, David A.. 1999. “The Economic Goals of Canada's Immigration Policy: Past and Present.” Canadian Public Policy: 425–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, A. 2011. “Time Will Tell? Temporality and the Analysis of Causal Mechanisms and Processes.” Comparative Political Studies 44: 1267–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiraudon, Virginie. 1999. “Jeux d'ombre et de lumière: les politiques envers les étrangers en Europe.” Revue française de science politique 49: 755–82.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob. 2005. “Policy Drift: The Hidden Politics of US Welfare State Retrenchment.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, ed. Streeck, W. and Thelen, K.. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Haddow, Rodney and Klassen, Thomas R.. 2006. Partisanship, Globalization, and Canadian Labour Market Policy: Four Provinces in Comparative Perspective. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Angela. 2012. “Ottawa Lauds Gov't Immigration Changes; Minister Mum on Numbers.” Saskatoon Star Phoenix, May 19, A1.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter. 2003. “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Politics.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Freda. 1988. Canada and Immigration: Public Policy and Public Concern. 2nd ed. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Freda. 1991. Critical Years in Immigration: Canada and Australia Compared. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael and M Wellstead, Adam. 2012. “Professional Policy Work in Federal States: Institutional Autonomy and Canadian Policy Analysis.” Canadian Public Administration 55: 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huras, Adam. 2013. “Provincial Leaders to Tackle Fiscal Gaps: Premier Alward Says Provinces Grappling with Differences in Taxation, Service Levels across the Nation.” The Moncton Times & Transcript, April 17, B3.Google Scholar
Inwood, Gregory J., John, Carolyn M. and O'Reilly, Patricia L.. 2011. Intergovernmental Capacity in Canada: Inside the World of Finance, Environment, Trade, and Health. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Sharon. 2004. “Canada and the Globalized Immigrant.” American Behavioral Scientist 47: 1263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian and Seidle, Leslie, eds. 2012. Immigration Integration in Federal Countries. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Kostov, Chris. 2008. “Canada-Quebec Immigration Agreements (1971–1991) and Their Impact on Federalism.” American Review of Canadian Studies 38: 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labelle, Micheline and Rocher, François. 2004. “Debating Citizenship in Canada: The Collide of Two Nation-Building Projects.” In From Subjects to Citizens: A Hundred Year of Citizenship in Australia and Canada, ed. Boyer, P., Cardinal, L. and Headon, D.. Ottawa: Presses de l'Université d'Ottawa.Google Scholar
Lecours, André. 2013. “The Question of Federalism in Nepal.” Publius 44 (3): 1–24.Google Scholar
Lewis, Nathaniel M. 2010. “A Decade Later: Assessing Successes and Challenges in Manitoba's Provincial Immigrant Nominee Program.” Canadian Public Policy 36: 241–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Linz, J.J. 1993. “State Building and Nation Building.” European Review 1: 355–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, eds. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manitoba. 1996. Annual Report 1995–1996. Winnipeg: Culture, Heritage and Citizenship.Google Scholar
Manitoba Legislative Assembly. 1994. Hansard of the Manitoba Legislative Assembly. 5th Session, 35th Legislature, May 4, 1994, Volume 20: 1410.Google Scholar
Mayntz, R. 2004. “Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34: 237–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArthur, Doug. 2007. “Policy Analysis in Provincial Governments in Canada: From PPBS to Network Management.” In Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art, ed. Dobuzinskis, L., Howlett, M. and Laycock, D.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
McMillan, M.L. and Norrie, K.H.. 1980. “Province-Building vs. A Rentier Society.” Canadian Public Policy 6: 213–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, Luis and Obydenkova, Anastassia. 2013. “Federalization in Russia and Spain: The Puzzle of Reversible and Irreversible Outcomes.” Regional & Federal Studies 23 (2): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Brunswick, Office of the Premier. 2011. “Atlantic Premiers Act to Strenghten Regional Collaboration”, http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/news/news_release.2011.05.0542.html (May 23, 2013).Google Scholar
Newton, Lina and Adam, Brian E.. 2009. “State Immigration Policies: Innovation, Cooperation or Conflict?”. Publius 39: 408–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nova Scotia. 2005. Nova Scotia's Immigration Strategy. Halifax: Nova Scotia Office of Immigration.Google Scholar
Ontario. 2012. A New Direction. Ontario's Immigration Strategy. Toronto: Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration.Google Scholar
Papillon, M. 2011. “Adapting Federalism: Indigenous Multilevel Governance in Canada and the United States.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 42: 289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1995. “Fragmented Welfare States: Federal Institutions and the Development of Social Policy.” Governance 8: 449–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince Edward Island. 2010. Prince Edward Island Settlement Strategy. Charlottetown: Departement of Innovation and Advanced Learning.Google Scholar
Québec. 1990. Au Québec pour bâtir ensemble. Énoncé de politique en matière d'immigration et d'intégration. Montréal: Ministère de l'Immigration et des Communautés culturelles.Google Scholar
Québec. Ministère des Communautés culturelles et de l'Immigration. 1991. “Accord Canada-Québec relatif à l'immigration et à l'admission temporaire des aubains (Accord Gagnon-Tremblay-Mcdougall). Montréal: Ministère de l'Immigration et des Communautés culturelles.Google Scholar
Rabson, Mia. 2012. “Province to Prod Feds on Immigrant Settlement.” Winnipeg Free Press, April 23, A6.Google Scholar
Rae, Bob. 1994. Hansard of the Ontario Legislative Assembly. 3rd Session, 35th Legislature, April 20, 1994: 1350–1400.Google Scholar
Robinson, Ian. 2003. “Neo-Liberal Trade Policy and Canadian Federalism Revisited.” In New Trends in Canadian Federalism, ed. Rocher, F. and Smith, M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 197–242.Google Scholar
Seidle, Leslie. 2010a. “The Canada-Ontario Immigration Agreement: Assessment and Options for Renewal.” Toronto: Mowat Centre for Policy Innovation.Google Scholar
Seidle, Leslie. 2010b. “Immigration Agreements and Public Accountability.” Policy Options July-August 2010: 49–53.Google Scholar
Sousa, Charles. 2012. “Provinces, Too.” Globe and Mail, May 18, A14.Google Scholar
Stelmach, Ed. 2006. Hansard of Alberta Legislative Assembly. 2nd Session, 26th Parliament, February 27, 2006: 72.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Marilla. 2012. “Provinces Should Have More Control over Immigration Numbers.” The Chronicle-Herald (Calgary), November 27, A4.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Garth. 1980. “Political Constraints and the Province-Building Objective.” Canadian Public Policy 6: 265–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, K., eds. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tolley, Erin, Biles, John, Vineberg, Robert, Burstein, Meyer and Frideres, James, eds. 2011a. The Integration and Inclusion of Newcomers and Minorities across Canada. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queens's University Press.Google Scholar
Tolley, Erin, Biles, John, Vineberg, Robert, Burstein, Meyer and Frideres, James, eds. 2011b. “The Integration and Inclusion of Newcomers and Minorities across Canada: Introduction.” In The Integration and Inclusion of Newcomers and Minorities across Canada, eds. Tolley, Erin, Biles, John, Vineberg, Robert, Burstein, Meyer and Frideres, James, eds. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Tomblin, Stephen. 1990. “W.A.C. Bennett and Province-Building in British Columbia.” BC Studies: The British Columbian Quarterly 82: 45–61.Google Scholar
van der Heijden, Jeroen. 2011. “Institutional Layering: A Review of the Use of the Concept.” Politics 31: 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venne, Michel. 1990. “Immigration: Québec Ne Veut Pas Tous Les Pouvoirs—Monique Gagnon-Tremblay.” La Presse, 5 juillet 1990, B1.Google Scholar
Vineberg, Robert. 1987. “Federal-Provincial Relations in Canadian Immigration.” Canadian Public Administration 30: 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vineberg, Robert. 2011. “History of Federal-Provincial Relations in Canadian Immigration and Integration.” In Integration and Inclusion of Newcomers and Minorities across Canada, ed. Biles, J., Burstein, M., Frideres, J., Tolley, E. and Vineberg, R.. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University.Google Scholar
Vineberg, Robert. 2012. Responding to Immigrants' Settlement Needs: The Canadian Experience. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, R.A., Faucher, Philippe and Blais, André. 1984. “The Concept of Province-Building: A Critique.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 17: 783–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar