Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:40:53.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Independent Living and Psychomotor Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Robert Kerr
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Roselyne Normand
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa

Abstract

While the majority of seniors live outside of institutions, many live in seniors apartment buildings rather than in single family dwellings. MacPherson (1983) suggested that not maintaining an independent living style may have some negative consequences for seniors. The question asked was whether differences in lifestyle arising from the nature of the residence were associated with measures of psychomotor performance. Some 36 seniors, average age approximately 68 yrs., all in good health, completed 800 responses on a discrete pursuit tracking task which emphasized response speed and accuracy. Significant differences in performance were noted for both RT and speed of movement. Overall, seniors living independently, either in urban or rural areas, responded faster than seniors living in seniors apartment buildings. The data do not imply a causal relationship, however, they do suggest that psychomotor variables are relevant factors to consider in regard to differing living styles.

Résumé

Alors que la majorité des personees âgées vivent en dehors des institutions, beaucoup d'entre elles résident plutôt dans des blocs-appartements pour retraités que dans des résidences familiales individuelles. MacPherson (1983) suggérait que, pour les aînés, le fait de ne pas avoir un style de vie autonome pouvait entraîner des conséquences négatives. La question qui était posée était de savoir si des différences dans le style de vie, découlant de la nature de la résidence, pouvaient être associées à des mesures de performances psychomotrices. Quelque trente-six retraités, dont la moyenne d'âge était approximativement de 68 ans, ont rempli des formulaires de huit cent questions, selon la méthode des tâches de poursuites discontinues. Ce travail exigeait précision et rapidité dans les réponses. On a pu remarquer des différences significatives, notamment dans la rapidité des mouvements. Les retraités vivant chez eux, de façon autonome, ont répondu plus rapidement que ceux qui résidaient dans des habitations pour retraités. Ces données ne peuvent permettre de conclure à une relation de cause à effet mais suggèrent que les variables concernant la psychomotricité constituent des facteurs pertinents à considérer, en regard des différents styles de vie.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buck, L., Leonardo, R., & Hyde, F. (1981). Measuring impaired performance with the NRC “stressalyser”. Applied Ergonomics, 12, 231236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitts, P.M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, R., Dall, J.L.C., Teaffe, M., Grimes, D., & Buck, L. (1987). Age changes in reaction and movement time within a complex motor task. In Clark, J.E. & Humphrey, J.H. (Eds.), Advances in motor development research (pp. 105119). New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, R., & Teaffe, M. (1991). Aging and the response to changes in task difficulty. Canadian Journal on Aging, 10, 1828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacPherson, B. (1983). Aging as a Social Process. Toronto: Butterworth and Co. Pub.Google Scholar
Mobily, K.E., Lemke, J.H., Drube, G.A., Wallace, R.R., & Leslie, D.K. (1987). Relationship between exercise attitudes and participation among rural elderly. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 4, 3850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normand, R., Kerr, R., & Métivier, G. (1987). Exercise, ageing and fine motor performance: an assessment. Journal of Sports Medicine & Physical Fitness, 27, 488496.Google ScholarPubMed
Spirduso, W.W. (1975). Reaction and movement time as a function of age and physical activity level. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 435440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spirduso, W.W. (1980). Physical fitness, aging and psychomotor speed: a review. Journal of Gerontology, 35, 850865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spirduso, W.W., & Clifford, P. (1978). Replication of age and physical activity effects on reaction and movement time. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 2630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stelmach, G.E., Goggin, N.L., & Garcia-Colera, A. (1987). Movement specification time with age. Experimental Aging Research, 13, 3946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teaffe, M.S. (1987). The effects of ontogenetic change on psychomotor abilities and adaptation to response errors. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Welford, A.T. (1980). Reaction Times. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Welford, A.T. (1984). Between bodily changes and performance: Some possible reasons for slowing with age. Experimental Aging Research, 10, 7388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed