Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:56:47.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Should the Economic Life Course be Redesigned? Old Age Security in a Time of Transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

John Myles
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Debra Street
Affiliation:
Florida State University

Abstract

The last “great pension debate” in Canada came to an end in the early 1980s but is now about to resume. The terms of debate have changed significantly, however. As a contribution to the debate, this paper aims to identify emergent positions and the new social, economic and political conditions to which they are a response. “Conservative” strategies have emphasized privatization of the pension function and greater emphasis on providing income-tested benefits to the low income elderly. New “progressive” alternatives have advocated a redesign of the welfare state to allow for a more flexible model of retirement and the economic life course more generally. Each is a response to real changes in the fiscal capacities of governments, the conditions for successful economic performance and the distribution of economic risk among age groups. The empirical core of the paper uses data from the Survey of Consumer Finances to show how the age distribution of economic well-being has changed since the the 1960s when the current welfare state was designed. Our aim is not to resolve the debate but to set it in context and identify the main assumptions and models underlying alternative strategies for reform.

Résumé

La dernière «grande polémique» sur la question de la retraite au Canada s'est terminée au début des années 80, mais celle-ci est sur le point de reprendre de plus belle. Les points soulevés cette fois ont considérablement changés. Afin de contribuer au débat, cet article a pour but de souligner les prises de positions émergentes ainsi que les nouvelles conditions sociales, économiques et politiques auxquelles elles répondent. Les stratégies «conservatrices» ont mis l'accent sur la privatisation de la fonction du régime de retraite et souligné l'importance d'offrir des rentes adéquates aux personnes âgées à faible revenu. De nouvelles solutions de rechange «progressistes» ont proposé une reformulation du système de bien-être afin de permettre l'établissement d'un modèle de retraite plus flexible et un parcours de vie économique plus général. Chacune de ces possibilités est une réponse aux changements concrets apportés aux responsabilités financières des gouvernements, aux conditions qui assureront un meilleur rendement économique, et à la répartition des risques sur le plan financier entre les divers groupes d'âge. Cet article se fonde sur des données empiriques tirées du Survey of Consumer Finances (sondage sur les finances du consommateur) afin de mettre en lumière les changements survenus dans la distribution du bien-être économique au sein des groupes d'âge depuis les années 60, période durant laquelle le système de bien-être actuel a été conçu. Notre objectif ne consiste pas à résoudre la question, mais plutôt à la placer dans son contexte et à souligner les principaux modèles et hypothèses qui sous-tendent les possibilités de rechange pour la réforme.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, B. (1982). The earnings replacement rate of old-age benefits in 12 countries, 1969–1980. Social Security Bulletin (November) 311.Google Scholar
Banting, K. (1985). Institutional conservatism: federalism and pension reform. In Ismael, J. (Ed.), Canadian Social Welfare Policy: Federal and Provincial Dimensions. Kingston and Montreal: McGill Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Banting, K. (1992). Economic Integration and social policy: Canada and the United States. In Hunsley, Terranee M. (Ed.), Social Policy in the Global Economy (pp. 2143). Kingston: School of Policy Studies, Queen's University.Google Scholar
Battle, K. (1993). Thinking the unthinkable: a targeted, not universal, old age pension. Caledon Commentary (October).Google Scholar
Battle, K., & Torjman, S. (1993a). Opening the Books on Social Spending. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.Google Scholar
Battle, K., & Torjman, S. (1993b). Federal Social Programs: Setting the Record Straight. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.Google Scholar
Block, F. (1987). Revising State Theory: Essays in Politics and Postindustrialism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Caledon Institute. (1994). Income tax savings from RRSP deduction. Fast Facts (February).Google Scholar
Canadian Labour Congress. (1994). The Economy, 5(1).Google Scholar
Canadian Task Force on Retirement Policy. (1979). The Retirement Income System in Canada. Hull: Canadian Government Publishing Centre.Google Scholar
Courchene, T. (1994). Social Canada in the Millennium: Reform Imperatives and Restructuring Principles. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.Google Scholar
Davis, S. (1992). Cross-country patterns of change in relative wages. Working paper No. 4085. National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economic Council of Canada. (1989). Legacies. 26th Annual Review. Ottawa: Economic Council of Canada.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1993). Life cycles, work and welfare: the European and American welfare states at the close of the 20th century. Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1994). Welfare states and the economy. In Smelser, Neil & Swedburg, Richard (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haber, C., & Gratton, B. (1993). Old Age and the Search for Security. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Homer, K., & Macleod, N. (1975). Changes in the Distribution of Income in Canada. Ottawa: Health and Welfare Canada.Google Scholar
Kohli, M., Rein, M., Guillemard, A.-M., & van Gunsteren, H. (1991). Time for Retirement: Comparative Studies of Early Exit from the Labor Force. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuttner, R. (1991). The End of Laissez-Faire. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Leacy, F.H. (Ed.). (1983). Historical Statistics of Canada (2nd ed.). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Lipietz, A. (1989). Towards a New Economic Order. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Mendelson, M. (1993). Social Policy in Real Time. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.Google Scholar
Morrisette, R., Myles, J., & Picot, G. (1994). Earnings and Equality and the Distribution of Working Time in Canada, Canadian Business Economics, Spring, 316.Google Scholar
Murphy, B.B., & Wolfson, M.C. (1991). When the baby boom grows old: impacts on Canada's public sector. Statistical Journal of the United Nations, 8(1), 2543.Google ScholarPubMed
Myles, J. (1989). Old Age in the Welfare State: The Political Economy of Public Pensions. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Myles, J., & Quadagno, J. (1994). The politics of income security for the elderly in Canada and the United States. In Marmor, Ted, Smeeding, Tim & Vernon, Greene (Eds.), Economic Security and Inter generational Justice: A Look at North America (pp. 6190). Washington: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Myles, J., & Teichroew, L. (1991). The politics of dualism: old age pensions in Canada. In Myles, John & Quadagno, Jill (Eds.), States, Labour Markets and the Future of Old Age Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Nakamura, A., & Lawrence, P. (1993). Education Training and Prosperity. Bell Canada. Papers on Economic Growth and Public Policy, October.Google Scholar
National Council of Welfare. (1992). Poverty Profile, 1980–1990. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services.Google Scholar
National Forum on Family Security. (1993). Family Security in Insecure Times. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Social Development.Google Scholar
Notestein, F. et al. (1944). The Future Population of Europe and the Soviet Union, Population Projections 1940–1970. Geneva: League of Nations.Google Scholar
O'Higgins, M. (1992). Social policy in the global economy. In Hunsley, Terranee (Ed.), Social Policy in the Global Economy (pp. 120). Kingston: Queen's University School of Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Oja, G., & Love, R. (1988). Pensions and Incomes of the Elderly in Canada, 1971–1985. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Okun, A. (1975). Equality and Efficiency: The Big Trade-off. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Peterson, P.G. (1993). Facing Up: How to Rescue the Economy from Crushing Debt and Restore the American Dream. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Piore, M., & Sabel, C. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Podoluk, J. (1968). Incomes of Canadians. Ottawa: Dominion Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
Premier's Council Report. (1990). People and Skills in the New Global Economy. Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario.Google Scholar
Radner, D. (1987). Money incomes of aged and non-aged family units, 1967–84. Social Security Bulletin, 50(8): 928.Google Scholar
Ransom, R., Sutch, R., & Williamson, S. (1991). Retirement: past and present. In Munnell, Alicia (Ed.), Retirement and Public Policy (pp. 2350). Washington: National Academy of Social Insurance.Google Scholar
Reich, R. (1991). The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st Century Capitalism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Riley, M.W. (1994). Aging and society: past, present and future. The Gerontologist, 34(4): 436446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellenberg, G. (1994). The Road to Retirement. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Social Development.Google Scholar
Schulz, J. (1988). The Economics of Aging. Dover, MA: Auburn House.Google Scholar
Smeeding, T., Torrey, B., & Rainwater, L. (1993). Going to extremes: an international perspective on the economic status of the U.S. aged. Working paper #87. Luxembourg Income Study.Google Scholar
Wolfson, M., & Evans, J.M. (1990). Statistics Canada's Low Income Cut-Offs: Methodological Concerns and Possibilities. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.Google Scholar
Wolfson, M., & Murphy, B. (1994). Kinder and gentler: income security for the elderly in Canada and the United States. In Marmor, Ted, Smeeding, Tim, & Greene, Vernon (Eds.), Economic Security and Intergenerational Justice: A Look at North America (pp. 227251). Washington: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Wolfson, M., Rowe, G., Gentleman, J., & Tomiak, M. (1991). Career earnings and death: a longitudinal analysis of older Canadian men. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.Google Scholar