Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:38:35.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Additive Maps on Units of Rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Tamer Košan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Gebze Technical University, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey, e-mail: mtkosan@gtu.edu.tr
Serap Sahinkaya
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Gebze Technical University, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey, e-mail: ssahinkaya@gtu.edu.tr
Yiqiang Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St.John’s, NL A1C 5S6, e-mail: zhou@mun.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let $R$ be a ring. A map $f\,:\,R\,\to \,R$ is additive if $f(a\,+\,b)\,=\,f(a)\,+\,f(b)$ for all elements $a$ and $b$ of $R$. Here, a map $f\,:\,R\,\to \,R$ is called unit-additive if $f(u\,+\,v)\,=\,f(u)\,+\,f(v)$ for all units $u$ and $v$ of $R$. Motivated by a recent result of $\text{Xu}$, $\text{Pei}$ and $\text{Yi}$ showing that, for any field $F$, every unit-additive map of ${{\mathbb{M}}_{n}}(F)$ is additive for all $n\,\ge \,2$, this paper is about the question of when every unit-additivemap of a ring is additive. It is proved that every unit-additivemap of a semilocal ring $R$ is additive if and only if either $R$ has no homomorphic image isomorphic to ${{\mathbb{Z}}_{2}}\,\text{or}\,R/J(R)\,\cong \,{{\mathbb{Z}}_{2}}\,$ with $2\,=\,0$ in $R$. Consequently, for any semilocal ring $R$, every unit-additive map of ${{\mathbb{M}}_{n}}(R)$ is additive for all $n\,\ge \,2$. These results are further extended to rings $R$ such that $R/J(R)$ is a direct product of exchange rings with primitive factors Artinian. A unit-additive map $f$ of a ring $R$ is called unithomomorphic if $f(uv)\,=\,f(u)f(v)$ for all units $u$, $v$ of $R$. As an application, the question of when every unit-homomorphic map of a ring is an endomorphism is addressed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2018

References

[1] Franca, W., Commuting maps on some subsets ofmatrices that are not closed under addition. Linear Algebra Appl. 437 (2012), no. 1, 388391. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.laa.2O12.02.018.Google Scholar
[2] Goldsmith, B., Pabst, S., and Scot, A., Unit sum numbers of rings and modules. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 49 (1998), no. 195, 331344. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1093/qmathj/49.3.331.Google Scholar
[3] Goodearl, K. R., Von Neumann regulär rings. Second ed., Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, FL, 1991.Google Scholar
[4] Goodearl, K. R. and Warneid, R. B. Jr., Algebras over zero-dimensional rings. Math. Ann. 223 (1976), no. 2, 157168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01360879.Google Scholar
[5] Hirano, H. and Park, J. K., On self-injective strongly n-regular rings. Comm. Algebra 21 (1993), no. 1, 8591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00927879208824552.Google Scholar
[6] Li, C., Wang, L., and Zhou, Y., On rings with the Goodearl-Menal condition. Comm. Algebra 40 (2012), no. 12, 46794692. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1080/00927872.2011.61 8856.Google Scholar
[7] Menal, P., On n-regular rings whose primitive factor rings are Artinian. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 20 (1981), no. 1, 7178. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/0022-4049(81)90049-9.Google Scholar
[8] Nicholson, W. K., Lifling idempotents and exchange rings. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 229 (1977), 269278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1977-0439876-2.Google Scholar
[9] Warneid, R. B. Jr., Exchange rings and decompositions of modules. Math. Ann. 199 (1972), 3136. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1007/BF0141 9573.Google Scholar
[10] Wolfson, K. G., An ideal-theoretic characterization ofthe ring ofall linear transformations. Amer. J. Math. 75 (1953), 358386. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2372458.Google Scholar
[11] Xu, X., Pei, Y., and Yi, X., Additive maps on invertible matrices. Linear Multilinear Algebra 64 (2016), 12831294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03081087.2015.1082962.Google Scholar
[12] Zelinsky, D., Every linear transformation is sum of nonsingular ones. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 5 (1954), 627630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1954-0062728-7Google Scholar