Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T21:32:20.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On an Extremal Problem Involving Harmonic Functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

E. J. P. Georg Schmidt
E. J. P. Georg Schmidt*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and McGill University, 805 Sherbrooke Street West Montreal, P.Q. CanadaCanada H3A 2K6
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Given a domain D in R” and two specified points P0 and P1 in D we consider the problem of minimizing u(p1) over all functions harmonic in D with values between 0 and 1 normalised by the requirement u(P0) = 1/2. We show that when D is suitably regular the problem has a unique solution u* which necessarily takes on boundary values 0 or 1 almost everywhere on the boundary. In the process we prove that it is possible to separate P0 and P1by a harmonic function whose boundary value is supported in an arbitrary set of positive measure. These results depend on the fact that (under suitable regularity conditions) a harmonic function which vanishes on an open subset of the boundary has a normal derivative which is almost everywhere non-vanishing in that set.

Keywords

harmonic functionsboundary valuesboundary control31A2031B2049B22
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , 01 March 1988 , pp. 63 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1988

References

1. Dahlberg, B.E.J., Estimates of harmonic measure, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 65 (1977), pp. 275–288.Google Scholar
2. Gilbarg, D., and Trudinger, N. S., Elliptic partial differential equations of second order, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (1983).Google Scholar
3. Hayman, W. K., and Kennedy, P. B., Subharmonic functions (Volume 1) Academic Press, London (1976).Google Scholar
4. Helms, L. L., Introduction to potential theory, Wiley-Interscience, New York (1969).Google Scholar
5. Hunt, R. A., and Wheeden, R. L., On the boundary values of harmonic functions, A.M.S. Transactions 132 (1968), pp. 307–322.Google Scholar
6. Jerison, D. S., and Kenig, C. S., An identity with applications to harmonic measure, A.M.S. Bulletin (New Series) 2 (1980), pp. 447–451.Google Scholar
7. Chr., Pommerenke, Univalent functions, Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, Gottingen (1975).Google Scholar
8. Rudin, W., Real and complex analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York (1974).Google Scholar
9. Schmidt, E. J. P. G., and N. Week, , On the boundary behaviour of solutions to elliptic and parabolic equations — with applications to boundary control for parabolic equations, SI AM J. Cont. and Opt. 16 (1978), pp. 593–598.Google Scholar
10. Week, N., Uber das prinzip der eindeutigen Fortsetzbarkeit in der Kontrolltheorie, Optimisation and optimal control, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 477, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1975), pp. 276–284.Google Scholar