Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:33:32.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of cardiac post-conditioning and remote pre-conditioning in paediatric cardiac surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2011

Wanjun Luo ,
Ming Zhu ,
Rimao Huang  and
Yangde Zhang
Wanjun Luo*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Xiang Ya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, People's Republic of China
Ming Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Xiang Ya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, People's Republic of China
Rimao Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Xiang Ya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, People's Republic of China
Yangde Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Xiang Ya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, People's Republic of China
*
Correspondence to: Dr W. Luo, MD, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Xiang Ya Hospital, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan 410008, People's Republic of China. Tel: +86 731 84310800; Fax: +86 731 84327247; E-mail: luo3478@yahoo.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Remote ischaemic pre-conditioning and cardiac ischaemic post-conditioning provide myocardial protection in cardiac surgery. However, these two endogenous strategies have not been directly compared in a clinical setting. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of remote ischaemic pre-conditioning and post-conditioning in providing myocardial protection to children undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass for surgical repair of ventricular septal defect.

Methods

We randomly assigned 60 paediatric patients scheduled for surgical correction of congenital ventricular septal defect to the post-conditioning group (n = 20), remote pre-conditioning group (n = 20), or control group (n = 20). Post-conditioning consisted of 30 seconds of ischaemia and 30 seconds of reperfusion achieved by clamping and unclamping the aorta, repeated three times over 3 minutes immediately after cardioplegic arrest. Remote ischaemic pre-conditioning consisted of 5 minutes of lower limb ischaemia followed by 5 minutes of reperfusion using a blood-pressure cuff inflated to a pressure of 200 millimetres of mercury, also repeated three times over 30 minutes. We assayed creatine kinase-MB, troponin I.

Results

Mean age, cardiopulmonary bypass times, and aortic cross-clamp times were matched across groups. Both post-conditioning and remote ischaemic pre-conditioning reduced the peak release of creatine kinase-MB (86.1 plus or minus 24.1 units per litre and 92.8 plus or minus 20.6 units per litre, respectively, versus 111.0 plus or minus 44.6 units per litre in the control, p less than 0.05) and troponin I (0.28 plus or minus 0.10 nanogram per millilitre and 0.26 plus or minus 0.09 nanogram per millilitre, respectively, versus 0.49 plus or minus 0.19 nanogram per millilitre in the control group, p less than 0.05).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that ischaemic post-conditioning and remote ischaemic pre-conditioning provide comparable myocardial benefit in children undergoing cold blood cardioplegic arrest.

Keywords

Myocardial protectioncongenital cardiac diseaseischaemiareperfusion
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , June 2011 , pp. 266 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Allen, BS. Paediatrics myocardial protection: where do we stand? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 128: 11–13.Google Scholar
2. Zhao, ZQ, Corvera, JS, Alkos, ME, et al. Inhibition of myocardial injury by ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion: comparison with ischemic preconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003; 285: H579–H588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Cheung, MM, Kharbanda, RK, Konstantinov, IE, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on children undergoing cardiac surgery: first clinical application in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 2277–2282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Ali, ZA, Callagham, CJ, Lim, E, Ali, AA, Nouraei, SA, Akthar, AM. Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial and renal injury after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized controlled trial. Circulation 2007; 116: I98–I105.Google Scholar
5. Venugopal, V, Hausenloy, DJ, Ludman, A, et al. Remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces myocardial injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cold-blood cardioplegia: a randomised controlled trial. Heart 2009; 95: 1567–1571.Google Scholar
6. Hausenloy, DJ, Mwamure, PK, Venugopal, V, et al. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007; 370: 575–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Luo, W, Li, B, Lin, G, Chen, R, Huang, R. Does cardioplegia leave room for postconditioning in paediatric cardiac surgery? Cardiol Young 2008; 18: 282–287.Google Scholar
8. Luo, W, Li, B, Chen, R, Huang, R, Lin, G. Effect of ischemic postconditioning in adult valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 33: 203–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Luo, W, Li, B, Lin, G, Huang, R. Postconditioning in cardiac surgery for tetralogy of Fallot. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133: 1373–1374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Li, B, Chen, R, Huang, R, Luo, W. Clinical benefit of cardiac ischemic postconditioning in corrections of tetralogy of Fallot. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009; 8: 17–21.Google Scholar
11. Wu, ZK, Iivainen, T, Pehkonen, E, Laurikka, J, Tarkka, MR. Ischemic preconditioning suppresses ventricular tachyarrhythmias after myocardial revascularization. Circulation 2002; 106: 3091–3096.Google Scholar
12. Venugopal, V, Ludman, A, Yellon, DM, Hausenloy, DJ. ‘Conditioning’ the heart during surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35: 977–987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed