Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:34:45.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagnostic findings and outcome in children with primary restrictive cardiomyopathy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Ulrich Neudorf ,
Angelika Bolte ,
Dieter Lang ,
Frank Hentrich  and
Achim A. Schmaltz
Ulrich Neudorf*
Affiliation:
From the Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Essen, Essen
Angelika Bolte
Affiliation:
From the Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Essen, Essen
Dieter Lang
Affiliation:
Section of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Ulm, Ulm
Frank Hentrich
Affiliation:
From the Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Essen, Essen
Achim A. Schmaltz
Affiliation:
From the Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Essen, Essen
*
Dr. Ulrich Neudorf, Klinik fü Kinder und Jugendmedizin, Pediatric Cardiology, University of Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany. Tel. 02017723-3351; Fax. 0201 /723-5983.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Restrictive cardiomyopathy is a rare disease in children and adolescents. We have now encountered eight such cases in infants and children aged between nine months and 14 years. The reasons for admission to hospital were not very specific and included recurrent bronchitis, thoracic deformity, pathologic findings on routine electro-cardiography, or signs of cardiac failure. Despite two cases with atrial flutter, the characteristic electrocardiographic sign was a P-wave in lead II of about 0.6 to 1.5 m V. Echocardiographically, the leading feature was enlargement of the atriums, seen in cross-sectional and M-mode tracings. Diameters and functional parameters for the left ventricle, and the EF-slope of the mitral valve were normal. In four patients examined specifically for diis aspect, a typical E/A-ratio was found. Cardiac catheterization was performed in all patients. Left atrial or pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were all abnormal, and pulmonary arterial pressures ranged from 30 to 60 mm Hg. Calculated pulmonary resistances were 3 to 12 units per meter squared. End-diastolic left ventricular pressures were elevated, while comparable right-sided pressures were normal. Percutaneous endomyocardial biopsy was done in six patients and performed as an open biopsy in two. Only unspecified signs, such as myocytic hypertrophy or interstitial fibrosis, were found. At present, five of the children have died within two years of diagnosis. One boy has undergone cardiac transplantation success-fully. The two youngest children are still alive. As there is such a poor prognosis, and no alternative specific therapy is known, cardiac transplantation must be discussed with the family at an early stage, emphasizing its consequences.

Keywords

Primary restrictive cardiomyopathyconstrictive pericarditisendomyocardial biopsydilated atriumsE/A ratio
Type
Original Manuscripts
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 44 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Report of the WHO/ISFC task force on the definition and classification of cardiomyopathies. Br Mean J 1980; 44: 672–673Google Scholar
2. First, T, Skovránek, J. Echokardiographische Methoden in der Diagnostik von Kardiomyopathien bei Kindern. Wien Klin Wochenschrift 1988; 24: 801–805Google Scholar
3. Kohlschütter, A, Hausdorf, G. Primary (genetic) cardiomyopathies in infancy. Eur J Pediatr 1986; 145: 454–459CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Chew, CYC, Ziady, GM, Raphael, MJ, Nellen, M, Oakley, M. Primary restrictive cardiomyopathy. Br Heart J 1977; 39: 399–413CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Katritsis, D, Wilmshurst, PT, Wendon, J, Davies, MJ. Primary restrictive cardiomyopathy: clinical and pathologic characteristics. J Amer Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 1230–1235CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Mehta, AV, Ferrer, PL, Pickoff, AS, Singh, SS. M-modeechocar-diographic findings in children with idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy. Ped Cardiol 1984; 5: 273–280CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Siegel, RJ, Shah, PK, Fishbein, MC. Idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1984; 70: 165–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Wilmshurst, PT, Katritsis, D. Restrictive cardiomyopathy. Br Heart J 1990; 63: 323–324. [Editorial]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Boffa, GM, Thiene, G, Nava, A, Volta, SD. Cardiomyopathy: a necessary revision of the WHO classification. Int J Cardiol 1991; 30: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Schoenfeld, MH, Supple, EW, Fallon, JT. Restrictive cardiomyopathy versus constrictive pericarditis: role of endomyocardial biopsy avoiding unnecessary thoracotomy. Circulation 1987; 75: 1012–1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Oberhänsli, I, Friedli, B, Cox, J, Metras, D. Endomyocardial fibro-sis in the child. Wien Klin Wochenschrift 1989; 101: 24–31.Google Scholar
12. Gewillig, M, Moermann, P, Dumoulin, M, van der Hauwaert, L. Restrictive cardiomyopathy in childhood. Ped Cardiol 1992; 13:258.Google Scholar
13. Rapezzi, C, Ortolani, P, Binetti, G, Picchio, FM, Magnani, B. Idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy in the young: report of two cases. Int J Cardiol 1990; 29: 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Toussaint, M, Planché, C, Villain, E, Kachaner, J. Restrictive cardiomyopathy in children. Ultra structural findings. Virchows Arch 1987:412:27–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Bengur, AR, Beekman, RH, Rocchini, AP, Crowley, DC, Schork, MA, Rosenthal, A. Acute hemodynamic effects of captopril in children with a congestive or restrictive cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1991; 83: 523–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. McManus, BM, Bren, GB, Robertson, EA, Katz, RJ. Hemodynamic cardiac constriction without anatomic myocardial restriction or pericardial constriction. Am Heart J 1981; 102: 134–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Vaitkus, PT, Kussmaul, W. Constrictive pericarditis versus restrictive cardiomyopathy: A reappraisal and update of diagnostic criteria. Am Heart J 1991; 122: 1431–1441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Hess, OM. Diagnostik der dilatativen Kardiomyopathie. Dtsch Med Wochenschrift 1986; 111: 3–10.Google Scholar
19. Sechtem, U, Tscholakoff, D, Higgins, CB. MRI of the abnormal pericardium. Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147: 245–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Isner, JM, Carter, BL, Bankoff, MS, Pastore, JO, Ramaswamy, K. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy by computed tomographic imaging. Am Heart J 1983; 105: 1019–1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Hatle, LK, Appleton, CP, Popp, RL. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1989; 79: 357–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Nishimura, RA, Warnes, CA. Restrictive cardiomyopathy: further understanding by Doppler echocardiography. Curr Opin Cardiol 1989; 4: 396–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Seward, JB. Restrictive cardiomyopathy: reassessment of definitions and diagnosis. Curr Opin Cardiol 1986; 3: 391–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar