Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:33:48.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early intervention home visiting — evaluated and revisited!: Evaluation of a preventative model to strengthen isolated families

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Helen Bryce  and
Paul Drielsma
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is a follow-up of a paper describing a proposed ‘best practice’ model for a home visiting service for first-time parents (Drielsma, 1998). The results of three years implementation and evaluation of a pilot of that model in a geographically isolated semi-metropolitan high growth area on the Central Coast, NSW are presented and discussed. The service uses paid professionals within the context of a ‘Family Centre’ with a volunteer network to offer ongoing home visiting support to first-time parents who are facing social and geographical isolation and who have few supports and resources to meet their needs. Importantly, the service has relied on close collaboration with child health services and a partnership with other community agencies and the local community itself. The external evaluation used a mix of Action Research and quantitative tools. This showed that the pilot model effectively engaged ‘high-risk’ families in a non-stigmatising way. Further, these families were networked to an array of other mainstream child health and family support services. The essence of this model was described through an Action Profiling process and this correlated closely with the model's structural parameters of operation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , 2002 , pp. 20 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abidin, R.R. (1990) Parenting Stress Index, 3rd Ed, Paediatric Psychology Press, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Barker, D. (1997) ‘Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in later life’, British Medical Bulletin, 53 (1), pp.96–108.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B.M. & Bradley, R.H. (1979) ‘Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A Revision of the Preschool Scale’, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, pp.235–244.Google Scholar
Curtis, S. (1996) Quality Appraisal of Higher Education Research: An Action-oriented, Process-based Alternative to Performance Indicators, unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
Department of Community Services (NSW) (1996) Trends in Child Protection: Profiles for financial Years 1991/92 - 1994/95, Information and Planning Group, Child & Family Services Directorate, May.Google Scholar
Drielsma, P. (1998) ‘Early intervention home visiting: a preventative model to strengthen isolated families’, Children Australia, 23(1), pp.4–11.Google Scholar
Lovibond, S.H. & Lovibond, P.F. (1998) Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS), Psychology Foundation Monograph. (Available from the Psychology Foundation. Room 1005 Matthews Building. University of New South Wales. NSW 2052, Australia)Google Scholar
Mustard, F.J. & McCain, M. (1999) Reversing the Real Brain Drain: Early Years Study, Final Report to the Canadian Government, Children's Secretariat, 10 75 Bay St, Suite 601, Toronto, ON M7A 1E9 (or see: www.childsec.gov.on.ca).Google Scholar
Nicholson, J., Tually, K. & Vimpani, G. (2000) ‘Establishing Research Priorities in Early Childhood Health Inequalities: an overview of the Australian research contribution and identification of priority areas for research’, draft discussion paper for the Health Inequalities Research Collaboration Workshop on Child, Youth and Family Research, 12th July 2000.Google Scholar
Olds, D.L., Henderson, C.R. & Kitzman, H. (1994) ‘Does Parental and Infancy Nurse Home Visitation Have Enduring Effects on Qualities of Parental Care giving and Child Health at 25 to 50 Months of Life?’, Paediatrics, 93(1), pp.89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, B.D., Pollard, R.A., Blakley, T.L., Baker, W.L. & Vigilante, D. (1995) ‘Childhood Trauma, the Neurobiology of Adaptation and “Use-dependent” Development of the Brain: How “States” become “Traits”’, Infant Mental Health J, 16(4), pp.271–291.Google Scholar
Siegel, E., Bauman, K.E., Schaefer, E.S., Saunders, M.M. & Ingram, D.D. (1980) ‘Hospital and home support during infancy: impact on maternal attachment, child abuse and neglect, and health care utilization’, Pediatrics, 66(2), pp. 183–90.Google Scholar
Sheeley, C. (1995) Justice for Central Coast Residents, Research Project - ITRAC Wyong Shire Inc. Google Scholar
Shonkofif, J.P., & Phillips, D.A., (eds) (2000) From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development, Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development National Research Council and Institute of Medicine, USA.Google Scholar
Smyth, N. & Drielsma, P. (1998) ‘The Northern Lakes Family Centre – Building Social Capital to Strengthen Families through Partnerships’, Community Quarterly, 46 (June), pp.72–87.Google Scholar
Tracy, E.M. & Whittaker, J.K. (1990) ‘The Social Network Map: Assessing Social Support in Clinical Practice, Families in Society’, Journal of Contemporary Human Services, October.Google Scholar
Vimpani, G., Frederico, M. & Barclay, L. (Consultants) (1996) ‘An Audit of Home Visiting Programs and the Development of an Evaluation Framework’, commissioned under the auspices of the National Child Protection Council by the Department of Health and Community Services, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar