Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T16:05:40.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Five years after Carmody: practitioners’ views of changes, challenges and research in child protection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2019

Ines Zuchowski Open the ORCID record for Ines Zuchowski [Opens in a new window]
Ines Zuchowski*
Affiliation:
Social Work and Human Services, James Cook University, Douglas, Qld 4811, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Ines Zuchowski, Email: ines.zuchowski@jcu.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Child protection work is a complex and difficult area of practice, one that is closely scrutinised and criticised, and impacts on the lives of many children. In Australia, child protection systems are overloaded, and increasing numbers of children and families receive child protection interventions each year. This study explored the views of North Queensland practitioners who work in the child protection field, examining changes and challenges in this field of practice, and their suggestions for the future research that is needed in child protection. The study took place 5 years after the 2013 Queensland Carmody inquiry into child protection intervention, which recommended sweeping changes to the child protection system. Twenty-two practitioners participated in this study. Respondents reported an increase in the complexity of cases, a gap in legislation change/practice frameworks and practice, and the application of trauma-informed practice. They highlighted the intersection of child protection, domestic violence and family law and observed that women and children continue to be exposed to violence because of Family Law Court orders. Respondents identified a number of areas where research is needed.

Keywords

Child protectionfield educationpractitionersresearch
Type
Articles
Information
Children Australia , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 146 - 153
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, F., & Hansen, P. (2006). Five tumultuous years in Australian child protection: little progress. Child & Family Social Work, 11(1), 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2018). Child Protection Australia 2016-17. Retrieved from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/child-protection/child-protection-australia-2016-17/contents/table-of-contents-print-reportGoogle Scholar
Beddoe, L. (2011). Investing in the future: Social workers talk about research. The British Journal of Social Work, 41(3), 557–575. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugeja, L., Butler, A., Buxton, E., Ehrat, H., Hayes, M., McIntyre, S. J., & Walsh, C. (2013). The implementation of domestic violence death reviews in Australia. Homicide Studies, 17(4), 353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmody, T. (2013). Taking responsibility: A roadmap for Queensland Child Protection. Retrieved from http://www.childprotectioninquiry.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/202625/qcpci-final-report-web-version.pdfGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, J., Lancaster, K., & Hughes, C. (2016). The stigmatisation of ‘ice’ and under-reporting of meth/amphetamine use in general population surveys: A case study from Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 36, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child Protection Systems Royal Commission. (2016). The life they deserve: Child Protection Systems Royal Commission Report. Volume 1: Summary and report. Retrieved from https://www.agd.sa.gov.au/sites/default/files/preface_summary_and_recommendations.pdf?v=1491456705Google Scholar
Collins-Camargo, C., Ellett, C. D., & Lester, C. (2011). Measuring organizational effectiveness to develop strategies to promote retention in public child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 289–295.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Darlington, Y., Feeney, J. A., & Rixon, K. (2005). Interagency collaboration between child protection and mental health services: Practices, attitudes and barriers. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(10), 1085–1098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fouché, C. (2015). Practice Research partnerships in social work: Making a difference. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glisson, C., Dukes, D., & Green, P. (2006). The effects of the ARC organizational intervention on caseworker turnover, climate, and culture in children’s service systems. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(8), 855–880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hameed, M. (2018). Challenges and opportunities for innovation in child abuse and neglect research within the child welfare system in Australia. Children Australia, 43(1), 57–66. doi: 10.1017/cha.2017.49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, C., Harries, M., & Liddiard, M. (2018). Child protection, child deaths, politics and policy making: Numbers as rhetoric. Children Australia, 43(3), 198–207. doi: 10.1017/cha.2018.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S. N., Lee, Y., & Wernham, M. (2011). A new age for child protection– General Comment 13: Why it is important, how it was constructed, and what it intends? Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 970–978. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.09.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, D., Plummer, D., Pighills, A., & Pain, T. (2013). Practitioner research capacity: A survey of social workers in Northern Queensland. Australian Social Work, 66(4), 540–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, K., & Lonne, B. (2010). The social work & human services workforce: Report from a national study of education, training and workforce needs. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.Google Scholar
Lonne, B., Harries, M., Featherstone, B., & Gray, M. (2016). Working ethically in child protection. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McBeath, B., & Austin, M. J. (2015). The organizational context of research-minded practitioners: Challenges and opportunities. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(4), 446–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queensland Government. (2013). Queensland Government response to the Queensland Child Protection Commission of inquiry final report. Taking responsibility: A roadmap for Queensland Child Protection. Retrieved from https://www.communities.qld.gov.au/resources/reform-renewal/qg-response-child-protection-inquiry.pdfGoogle Scholar
Queensland Government. (2017). Child Protection Reform Amendment Act 2017. Retrieved from https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/html/asmade/act-2017-044Google Scholar
Salem, P., & Dunford-Jackson, B. L. (2008). Beyond politics and positions: A call for collaboration between family court and domestic violence professionals. Family Court Review, 46(3), 437–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M., Cree, V. E., MacRae, R., Sharp, D., Wallace, E., & O’Halloran, S. (2016). Social suffering: Changing organisational culture in children and families social work through critical reflection groups– Insights from Bourdieu. British Journal of Social Work, 47(4), 973–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrentas, C., Freiwirth, C., Benatti, S., Hill, C., & Yurasek, A. (2018). Bridging the divide between the research and practitioner sectors. Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 8(1), 93–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar