Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:29:31.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Young Women Subject to Statutory Orders and the Transition to Independence: Contradictions in policy and practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Margaret Liddell
Margaret Liddell*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Youth & Community Affairs, RMIT Coburg Campus, Avoca Grove, Coburg. Vic. 3058
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the way the state welfare system deals with young women who are subject to statutory orders and their need for support as they move towards independence. Young women’s views of their needs are highlighted. Evidence is drawn from the author’s and other relevant Australian and overseas research. The issues are examined within the context of general community trends and policy and practice implications are studied using Community Services Victoria as a case example.

A variety of social and economic factors are leading to young people in the general community living with their parents for longer periods of time. In contrast, young people subject to statutory orders, especially young women, are often being discharged from these orders - and thus isolated from adult guidance - shortly after they pass their mid-teens.

Assumptions about these young women’s needs - that they no longer require nor wish for support and are ready for complete independence at this early age - are challenged. The legal, organisational and practice constraints which reinforce these assumptions are analysed. The apparent contradiction arising from young women refusing services which they also say they require, is also discussed.

The author demonstrates that there is a need for a reconceptualisation of the issue. A new kind of partnership between workers and young women on statutory orders is needed and a policy and administrative framework which facilitates this. The implications of the findings for practice and policy - and especially the important contribution ttiat young women’s views can make to the development of social policy - are presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , 1992 , pp. 17 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldgate, H; Maluccio, A; & Reeves, C. (1989) Adolescents in Foster Families, London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Alder, C & Sandor, D. (1989) Homeless Youth as Victims of Violence, Melb: University of Melbourne, Department of Criminology.Google Scholar
Attorney–General’s Department (Courts Management Division) (1990) Children’s Court Statistics, Victoria.Google Scholar
Bryson, L & Edwards, A. (1988) ‘Gender, Social Control and Community Services’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, Vol 24, No 3, November.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesney-Lind, M. (1985) ‘Girls and Deinstitut ionalisation: Is Sexism and Juvenile Justice a Dead Issue’, Paper presented it Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Diego.Google Scholar
Community Services Victoria, (1991) Client Information System, (unpublished) Melbourne.Google Scholar
Gamble, H. (1985) ‘Status Offenders’ in Borowski, A. & Murray, J. (eds) Juvenile Delinquency in Australia, Sydney: Methven.Google Scholar
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. (1989) Our Homeless Children, Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
Hancock, L. & Chesney-Lind, M. (1985) ‘Juvenile Justice: Legislation and Gender Discrimination’, in Borowski, A. & Murray, J. (eds) Juvenile Delinquency in Australia, Sydney: Methven.Google Scholar
Higgins, D. (1990) Who Cares Anyway: The Control, Protection and Punishment of Young Women in the Juvenile Justice System in Victoria, Melbourne: Girls Action Inc.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, S. & McDowell, M. (1990a) Policy and Planning for Appropriate Service Responses for Young Women, (unpubl.rept.) Melb.: CSV.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, S. & McDowell, M. (1990b) Study of Young Women admitted to Winlaton, (unpubl. rept.) Melb.: CSV.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, S. & McDowell, M. (1990c) Study of Short Stays in Winlaton, Turana and Baltara Institutions, (unpubl. rept.) Melb.: CSV.Google Scholar
Hirst, C. (1989) Forced Exit: Youth Homeless-ness Policy Development Project, Melbourne: Salvation Army.Google Scholar
Liddell, M. & Goddard, C. (1991) ‘State Wardship and Supervision and Youth Homelessness: Towards a Better Future’, National Social Policy Conference Proceedings, Sydney, Australia. Google Scholar
Liddell, M., Hynes, S. & McKenzie, K. (1989) Young Women Say… a survey of the accommodation and support needs of a sample of young women in the Western Port Region, Melbourne: CSV.Google Scholar
Murray, J. (1981) Innovations in Juvenile Justice in Victoria 1970–1980, a thesis submitted for a degree of master of Social Work, Latrobe University, Victoria. Google Scholar
Piper, K. & Smith, G. (1990) ‘Victims, Nuisances or Both? Changing Protective Services for Young People’, Children Australia, Vol. 15, No 3.Google Scholar
Sarri, R. (1983) ‘Gender Issues in Juvenile Justice’, Crime and Delinquency, Vol 29, No 3, July 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Women’s Co-ordination Unit, Premiers Dept. (1986) Girls at Risk, Sydney: NSW Govt.Google Scholar
Youth Policy Development Council, Dept. of Labour (1988) Nothing Wrong with Me, Melbourne: Victorian Govt.Google Scholar