Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T16:30:59.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fear for Manufacturing? China and the Future of Industry in Brazil and Latin America*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2012

Rhys Jenkins  and
Alexandre de Freitas Barbosa
Rhys Jenkins
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia. Email: r.o.jenkins@uea.ac.uk
Alexandre de Freitas Barbosa
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo. Email: afbarbosa@usp.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There has been considerable concern in Latin America over the implications of increased competition from China for local industry. These concerns include the possibility of “deindustrialization,” the increased “primarization” of the region's exports and the difficulties of upgrading manufactured exports into higher technology products. This article examines the impact of Chinese competition both in the domestic market and in export markets on Brazilian industry. It documents the increased penetration of Chinese manufactures in the Brazilian market and the way in which Brazilian exports have lost market share to China in the US, European Union and four Latin American countries. Brazil, because of its more developed and locally integrated industrial sector, is not typical of other Latin American countries and the article also discusses the relevance of the Brazilian experience for the region as a whole.

Keywords

BrazilLatin AmericaimportsexportsdeindustrializationChinese competition
Type
Articles
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 209 , March 2012 , pp. 59 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jenkins, R., “El ‘efecto China’ en los precios de los productos básicos y en el valor de las exportaciones de América Latina,” Revista CEPAL, No. 103 (2011), pp. 77–93Google Scholar.

2 Peters, E. Dussel, Economic Opportunities and Challenges Posed by China for Mexico and Central America (Bonn: German Development Institute, 2005), pp. 111–12Google Scholar.

3 Thompson, G., “Mill closings hit hard in Central America,” New York Times, 25 March 2005Google Scholar.

4 Murphy, Helen, Swann, Christopher and Drajem, Mark “Economic outlook: competition from China squeezes developing countries,” International Herald Tribune, 2 April, 2007Google Scholar.

5 Paraguassu, F. “O tamanho de ameaca,” Industria Brasileira, Abril 2007Google Scholar.

6 “Latam shoe industry calls for ‘united front’ against China's disloyal practices,” Montevideo: MercoPress, South Atlantic News Agency, 23 October 2010.

7 CANACERO, “México y Latinoamérica preocupados por los procesos de desindustrializatión en la región,” Mexico City press release, 9 May 2011.

8 “Novegil alerta por proceso de desindustrialización en Latinoamérica durante congreso del acero en Brasil” press release downloaded from http://www.ternium.com.mx/saladeprensa/noticias/7470 (4 July 2011).

9 CEPAL, La República Popular China y América Latina y el Carbie: Hacia una nueva fase en el vínculo económico y comercial (Santiago: Naciones Unidas, 2011), p. 21Google Scholar.

10 Moreira, Mauricio Mesquita, “Fear of China: is there a future for manufacturing in Latin America?” World Development, Vol. 35, No. 3 (2007), pp. 355–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Gallagher, K. and Porzecanski, R., The Dragon in the Room: China and the Future of Latin American Industrialization (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

12 Ibid. ch. 4.

13 Prebisch, R., “El Desarrollo Econômico de la América Latina y algunos de sus Principales Problemas,” in Cincuenta Años de Pensamiento en la CEPAL – Textos Seleccionados, Vol. 1 (Santiago: CEPAL, 1998)Google Scholar.

14 Bielschowsky, R., Pensamento Econômico Brasileiro: O Ciclo Ideológico do Desenvolvimentismo (Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 1995), 2nd edGoogle Scholar.

15 Fajnzylber, F., “Industrialización en América Latina: de la ‘Caja Negra al Casillero Vacío’,” in Cincuenta Años de Pensamiento en la CEPAL – Textos Seleccionados, Vol. 2. (Santiago: CEPAL, 1998)Google Scholar.

16 Lederman, D., Olarreaga, M. and Perry, G. (eds.), China's and India's Challenge to Latin America: Opportunity or Threat? (Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2009)Google Scholar.

17 Sanitso, Javier (ed.), The Visible Hand of China in Latin America (Paris: OECD, 2007)Google Scholar.

18 “China has become a strategic supplier for Brazilian manufacturers in diverse sectors, which have benefited from the low cost of Chinese products to guarantee technological renovation and expansion of Brazil's industrial base,” Conselho Empresarial Brasil-China, China-Brazil Trade Report, Year 1, Issue 1 (2008), p. 4.Google Scholar

19 Own elaboration from USITC database. Import data refer to China and Hong Kong.

20 Own elaboration from EU COMEXT database. Import data refer to 15 EU countries’ imports from China and Hong Kong.

21 See e.g. Blázquez-Lidoy, Jorge, Rodríguez, Javier and Santiso, Javier, “‘Angel or devil?’ China's trade impact on Latin American emerging markets,” in Sanitso, Javier (ed.), The Visible Hand of China in Latin America (Paris: OECD, 2007), pp. 45–83Google Scholar; Meller, Patricio and Contreras, Gabriela, “La competitividad de las exportaciones chinas en los mercados de Estados Unidos y Japon,” CIEPLAN Serie Estudios Socio/Económicos No. 16 (2003)Google Scholar; Schott, P. K., The Relative Competitiveness of China's Exports to the United States vis á vis Other Countries in Asia, the Caribbean, Latin America and the OECD (New Haven: Yale School of Management, mimeo, 2004)Google Scholar.

22 For a critique of the use of the ESI to measure the extent to which countries’ exports are exposed to competition from China, see Jenkins, R., “Measuring the competitive threat from China for other southern exporters,” The World Economy, Vol. 31, No. 10 (2008), pp. 1351–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Lall, Sanjaya and Weiss, John, “China's competitive threat to Latin America; an analysis for 1990–2002,” Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 33, No. 2 (2005), p. 163CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Freund, C. and Ozden, C., “The effect of China's exports on Latin American trade with the world,” and Hanson, G. and Robertson, R., “China and the recent evolution of Latin America's manufacturing exports” both in Lederman, D., Olarreaga, M. and Perry, G. (eds.), China's and India's Challenge to Latin America: Opportunity or Theat? (Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2009)Google Scholar; Jenkins, R., “China's global growth and Latin American exports,” in Paulino, A. Santos and Wan, G. (eds.), The Rise of China and India (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2010)Google Scholar; Gallagher and Prozecanski, Dragon in the Room, ch. 3.

25 On competition between China and the Latin American countries in the EU see R. Jenkins, “Chinese competition and Latin American exports to the United States and the European Union,” paper presented at the workshop “From the Great Wall to the New World: China and Latin America in the 21st century” held at UCLA, 15–16 April 2011. On competition with intra-regional exports in Latin America see Gallagher and Porzecanski, Dragon in the Room, pp. 51–56.

26 For a review of this debate, one of the principal advocates of the deindustrialization thesis is Pereira, L.C. Bresser, “Brasil Vive Desindustrialização,” in Folha de São Paulo, 28 August 2010Google Scholar; a critical view is expressed by Nassif, A., “Há Evidências de Desindustrialização no Brasil?” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 28, No. 1 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Bonneli, R. and Pessoa, S.A., Desindustrialização no Brasil: um Resumo da Evidência, Texto para Discussão, No. 7 (Rio de Janeiro: IBRE/FGV, 2010)Google Scholar; a more subtle approach, defending the approach of a “relative deindustrialization” can be found in Almeida, J., Carvalho, P. and Feijó, C., Ocorreu uma Desindustrialização no Brasil? (São Paulo: IEDI, 2005)Google Scholar.

27 de Castro, A. Barrros, “From semi-stagnation to growth in a Sino-centric market,” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 28, No. 1 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 For this debate, see Furtado, C., A Economia Latino-Americana: Formação Histórica e Problemas Contemporânenos (São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 1986), 3rd ed.Google Scholar; Rangel, I., “Economia: Milagre e Antimilagre (1985),” in Obras Reunidas, Vol. 1 (Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 2005)Google Scholar; Tavares, M.C., Da Substituição de Importações ao Capitalismo Financeiro (Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores, 1973), 2nd ed.Google Scholar; de Castro, A. Barros and de Souza, F.E. Pires, A Economia Brasileira em Marcha Forçada (São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2004), 3rd edGoogle Scholar.

29 This view is expressed by Franco, G., O Desafio Brasileiro: Ensaios sobre Desenvolvimento, Globalização e Moeda (São Paulo: Editora 34, 1999)Google Scholar.

30 Bonneli and Pessoa. Desindustrialização no Brasil; Nassif, “Há Evidências de Desindustrialização.”

31 CEBC, Investimentos Chineses no Brasil: uma Nova Fase da Relação Brasil-China (Rio de Janeiro: CEBC, 2011)Google Scholar.

32 Barbosa, A.F., and Tepassê, A.C., “O Ciclo da Economia Global e as Relações Comerciais entre Brasil e China,” in Altemani, Henrique (ed.), China e Índia na América Latina – Oportunidades e Desafios (Curitiba: Juruá Editora. 2009)Google Scholar.

33 Even this figure may be somewhat exaggerated since it includes a lot of semi-manufactured products.

34 Apparent consumption is defined as the gross value of industrial production plus imports of manufactures minus exports of manufactures.

35 See Jenkins, R. and Barbosa, A., A Ascensão Chinesa e os Dilemas para a Indústria Brasileira: Pressão Competitiva, Reestruturação Econômica e Emprego (São Paulo: Briefing Paper ESRC/Cebrap Project, 2011), Table 5Google Scholar.

36 Ibid. Table 2.

37 CNI, Sondagem Especial, Ano 9, No. 1, fevereiro de 2011.

38 For example Federaçao das Indústrias do Estado de Sao Paulo, , A Ascensao Chinesa e os Prejuízos às Exportaçoes Brasileiras para os Estados Unidos (Sao Paulo: FIESP, 2007)Google Scholar; Competicão Brasil-China nos Mercados Externo e Interno (Sao Paulo: FIESP, n.d.)

39 Machado, J. Mesquita and Ferraz, G. Tinoco, Comercio Externo da China: Efeitos sobre as exportacões Brasileiras (Brasilia: IPEA Texto para Discussão No. 1182, 2006)Google Scholar; Filgueiras, M. and Kume, H., A Competitividade do Brasil e da China no Mercado Norte-Americano: 2000-2008 (Brasilia: IPEA Texto para Discussão No. 1501, 2010)Google Scholar; Hiratuka, C. and Cunha, S., Qualidade e Diferenciacão das Exportacões Brasileiras e Chinesas: Evolucão Recente no Mercado Mundial e na ALADI (Brasilia: IPEA Texto para Discussão No. 1622, 2011)Google Scholar

40 Batista, J. Chami “Competition between Brazil and other exporting countries in the US import market: a new extension of constant-market-shares analysis,” Applied Economics, No. 40 (2008). pp. 2477–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 The loss of market share by Brazil (B) to China (C), in a particular product i is defined as:

(1)

where:

kBi is the share of Brazil in total imports of good i by the destination market

kCi is the share of China in total imports of good i by the destination market

Superscript t represents the initial year of the period.

Summing over all products gives the aggregate loss of market share to China:

(2)

42 Although it should be noted that subsequently the US and the EU imposed new restrictions on Chinese textile and clothing imports.

43 This is even more disaggregated than the five-digit SITC level.

44 Data from SECEX/MDIC. The remaining exports are classified as semi-manufactures.

45 Jenkins, R., “The Latin American case,” in Jenkins, Rhys and Dussel, Enrique (eds.), China and Latin America: Economic Relations in the 21st Century (Bonn: German Development Institute, 2009), p. 37Google Scholar.

46 Own estimates from UNIDO data on industrial production and CEPAL data on trade in manufactured goods. Using the same data sources, the estimate for Brazil in 2007 was 2%.

47 Jenkins, “The Latin American case,” Table 5.

48 Own elaboration from UN COMTRADE data on imports by Broad Economic Category (BEC).

49 Jenkins, Chinese Competition, Table 3.

50 INTAL, “Chinese products’ penetration in MERCOSUR imports” INTAL Monthly Newsletter, No. 173, January 2011Google Scholar.

51 See IEDI, Contibuições para uma Agenda de Desenvolvimento do Brasil (Sao Paulo: Instituto de Estudos para o Desenvolvimiento Industrial, 2011), p. 33Google Scholar. For more detailed proposals on industrial policy for Brazil, see IEDI, Indústria e Política Indusrial no Brasil e em Outros Países (Sao Paulo: Instituto de Estudos para o Desenvolvimiento Industrial, 2011), pp. 67–83Google Scholar.