Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:23:45.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taiwan's International Status Today*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Byron S. J. Weng
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the past three decades Taiwan has gained in terms of its economy but has substantially waned in terms of its international status.

Economically, Taiwan has performed so impressively that it has become one of the newly industrialized countries (NICs) that are the envy of many developing nations. Its sustained high growth rate over a fairl, long period commands respect from economists all over the world. In 1983 the GNP of the country approached US$50 billion and its per capita income reached US$2, 444. It is one of the world's top 15 trading nation" and has enjoyed a favourable balance of payments for many years. The 1983 exports and imports were valued at US$25, 117 million and 20, 285 million, respectively.

Type
Taiwan Briefing
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 99 , September 1984 , pp. 462 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. SeeClough, Ralph N., “Taiwan's international status,” in Chiu, Hungdah and Downen, Robert (eds), Multi-system Nations and International Law (Baltimore: Occasional Papeis/Reprints Series in Contemporary Asian Studies [hereafter cited as OPRSCAS]), No. 8–1981, pp. 141–59Google Scholar.

2. The KMT Government has bolstered its legitimacy by adopting temporary legislation which effectively shelves the most important provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of China under the guise that a civil war exists between the nationalists and the communist rebels. Such temporary legislation has been amended as needed over the years.

3. See the statement by Holbrooke, Richard on 11 06 1980, “Review of relations with Taiwan”, published by U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Public AffairsGoogle Scholar;

4. Report to the First Meeting, 50th Session of the First Legislative Yuan, 29 September 1972.

5. Instructions to the Foreign Ministry, 3 November 1972.

6. The premier's oral report to the First Meeting of the 52nd Session of the First Legislative Yuan, 25 September 1973.

7. See Chien, Frederick, “Current situation regarding foreign relations of our country,” Haiwai xueren (Scholars Abroad) (Taipei), No. 112 (11 1971), pp. 2–11Google Scholar; and Chapters on foreign relations in the annual Yearbook of the Republic of China.

8. SeeJiyu, Zhuang, “Some observations on Sino-Korean relations”, Minzhuren (The Democrat) (Taipei), No. 9 (1 06 1983), pp. 30–31Google Scholar; Zongmao, Xuet al., “Diplomatic red light over the basketball court,” Shibao zhazhi (China Times Magazine) (Taipei), No. 228 (11 04 1984), pp. 7–12Google Scholar.

9. See Ming Bao Daily, 7 March 1984, and editorial of the same paper, 20 March 1984.

10. Guidelines for Personnel Attending International Conferences (Executive Yuan, 3 July 1979); Guidelines for Dispatching Personnel to International Conferences and for Convening International Conferences (Executive Yuan, 3 July 1979).

11. See Yang's, report on Qishi niandai (The Seventies Monthly), No. 163 (08 1983Google Scholar) and Renmin ribao (People's Daily), 29 July 1983, p. 1.

12. See my “Taiwan and the politics of international sports”, a paper presented at the Conference on Taiwan's Future, 8–1208 1983, in BeijingGoogle Scholar;

13. See Liu, Melinda, “Taiwan's secret ‘peace’ with the mainland,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 6 10 1978, pp. 8–10Google Scholar;

14. Wren, Christopher S., “China and Taiwan develop unofficial contacts,” International Herald Tribune, 24 02 1984, p. 5Google Scholar;

15. See, e.g. Chiu, Hungdah, Zhongmei quanxi wenti lunji (Essays on Questions Regarding Sino-American Relations) (Taipei: Shibao Cultural Publishers, Ltd., 1979), pp. 31 ffGoogle Scholar;

16. Seeibid. pp. 119–30. For the text and relevant legislation history of the TRA, see Wolff, Lester L. and Simon, David L. (eds.), Legislative History of the Taiwan Relations Act; An Analytic Compilation with Documents on Subsequent Developments (Jamaica, N.Y.: American Association for Chinese Studies, 1982)Google Scholar; U.S. Congress, 96th Congress, Second Session, Taiwan: One Year After United States-China Normalization, a Workshop sponsored by the Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate and Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980)Google Scholar;

17. Texts of these agreements are in Chiu, Hungdah (ed.), Chinese Yearbook of International Law and Affairs, Published by OPRSCAS for the Chinese Society of International Law – Chinese (Taiwan) Branch of International Law Association, Vol. 1 (1981), pp. 194–255Google Scholar; Vol. 2 (1982), pp. 344–80.

18. See Wolff, and Simon, (eds.), Legislative History, pp. 312–29Google Scholar;

19. See Junshan, Shen, “Peaceful competition of two systems under one China,” Qishi niandai. No. 171 (04 1984), pp. 68–73Google Scholar;

20. See Chiu and Downen (eds.), Multi-system Nations.

21. See Zongmao, Xu, “We are endeavouring to win friends all the time,” Shibao zhazhi (ChinaTimes Magazine), No. 221 (22 02 1984), p. 20Google Scholar;