Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T10:33:29.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changing Images of the Samaritan Woman in Early Reformed Commentaries on John

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Craig S. Farmer
Craig S. Farmer
Affiliation:
Mr. Farmer is assistant professor of history and humanities at Milligan College, Milligan College, Tennessee.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Medieval Christians were fascinated by the character of the Samaritan woman, whose story is presented in the fourth chapter of the Gospel of John. Numerous legends celebrating her life history recounted in imaginative detail the heroic deeds of this convert to Christ. The Bible itself, of course, gives no information about her following her encounter with Jesus, nor does it even mention her name. But medieval hagiographers named her Photina and recounted her brave witness to the gospel, leading to her ultimate martyrdom. One legend reports that she converted the daughter of Nero and was martyred in Rome. Another places her in Carthage, where she preached the gospel and died in prison. Although ancient and medieval commentaries on the fourth Gospel do not commemorate these extracanonical accomplishments, they portray the Samaritan woman's personality and discipleship in equally flattering ways. Not only does she beautifully model the sinner's conversion to Christ, but she also demonstrates admirable zeal in bearing witness to Christ among her fellow Samaritans. On the basis of her testimony, a host of the citizens of Sychar come to faith in Christ, a feat matched by none of Jesus' disciples in the pages of the Gospels.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 365 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dunbar, Agnes B. C., A Dictionary of Saintly Woman (London, 1905), 2:151;Google Scholar and Jeffrey, David Lyle, ed., A Dictionary of Biblical Tradition in English Literature (Grand Rapids, Mich., 1992), pp. 844–845.Google Scholar

2. For background on the history of exegesis, readers should consult the following standard sources: The Cambridge History of the Bible, 3 vols., ed. Evans, C. F. (vol. 1), Lampe, G. W. H. (vol. 2), and Greenslode, S. L. (vol. 3) (Cambridge, U.K., 1963–1970);Google ScholarGrant, Robert M., with Tracy, David, A Short History of the Interpretation of the Bible, 2d ed. (Philadelphia, Pa., 1984);Google Scholar and Bible de tous les temps, 8 vols., Kannengiesser, Charles, gen. ed. (Paris, 1984–).Google Scholar Several important works have appeared on the medieval period: Spicq, Ceslans, Esquisse d'une histoire de l'exégèse latine du moyen âge (Paris, 1944);Google ScholarSmalley, Beryl, The Study of the Bible in the Middle Ages (Notre Dame, Ind., 1964);Google Scholarde Lubac, Henri, Exégèse Médiévale: les quatre sens de L'Ecriture, 4 vols. (Paris, 1959–1964);Google ScholarPreus, James C., From Shadow to Promise: Old Testament Interpretations from Augustine to the Young Luther (Cambridge, Mass., 1969);CrossRefGoogle ScholarEvans, G. R., The Language and Logic of the Bible: The Earlier Middle Ages (Cambridge, U.K., 1984);CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Evans, G. R., The Language and Logic of the Bible: The Road to Reformation (Cambridge, U.K., 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar For the sixteenth century there is no comparable general treatment of the history of exegesis. Readers may want to consult Fatio, Olivier and Fraenkel, Pierre, eds., Histoire de l'exégèse au XVIe siècle: Textes du colloque international tenu à Genève en 1976 (Geneva, 1978);Google ScholarRoussel, B., “De Strasbourg à Bâle et Zurich: une École Rhénane d'exégèse (ca. 1525–ca.1540),” Revue d'Histoire et de Philosophie Religieuses 68 (1988): 19–39;Google Scholar and Steinmetz, David C., ed., The Bible in the Sixteenth Century (Durham, N.C., 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Chrysostom, John, Commentary on Saint John the Apostle and Evangelist: Homilies 1–47, The Fathers of the Church [FC] 33, trans. SisterGoggin, Thomas Aquinas (New York, 1957), pp. 306–309.Google Scholar

4. Ibid., pp. 316–318.

5. Ibid., p. 332.

6. Augustine of Hippo, Tractates on the Gospel of John 11–27, FC 79, trans. Rettig, John W. (Washington, D.C., 1988), pp. 84–97.Google ScholarOrigen (Commentary on the Gospel According to John Books 13–32, FC 89, trans. Heine, Ronald E. [Washington, D.C., 1993], pp. 77–80) produces an allegorical interpretation similar to Augustine's. The Samaritan woman represents the heterodox soul that is subjected to law (represented by the husband as the ruling principle of the soul). But the five husbands also represent the five senses that entangle the soul in bodily things leading to doctrinal error.Google ScholarCyril of Alexandria (Commentary on the Gospel According to S. John [Oxford, 1874], 1:209–210) also identifies ignorance as the primary problem of the Samaritan woman: “the minds of woman are womanish, and that an effeminate soul is in them, never having the power of understanding readily. But the nature of man somehow is apter for learning, and far more ready for reasoning.” Therefore, when Jesus commands her to call her husband, he is accusing her of being "most slow to learn, not practiced in the words of wisdom.”Google Scholar

7. Glossa Ordinaria, Patrologia Latina [PL] 114:372;Google ScholarAquinas, Thomas, Commentary on the Gospel of Saint John, part 1, trans. Weisheipl, James A. and Larcher, Fabian R. (Albany, N.Y., 1980), pp. 243–244;Google ScholarHugh of St. Cher, Postilla super totam Bibliam 6: In Evangelia secundum Matthaeum, Lucam, Marcum, & Joannem (Venice, 1732), fol. 306r;Google Scholarand , Bonaventure, Opera Omnia 6: Commentarius in Evangelium Ioannis (Florence, 1893), p. 294.Google Scholar

8. , Aquinas, Commentary on John, p. 243.Google Scholar

9. Denis the , Carthusian, Opera Omnia 12: Enarratio in Lucam (X–XXI), et johannem (Monstrolii, 1901), pp. 349–350.Google Scholar

10. , Aquinas, Commentary on John, p. 244.Google Scholar

11. Ibid., p. 245.

12. , Denis, Enarratio in johannem, p. 352.Google Scholar

13. Glossa Ordinaria, PL 114:374.Google Scholar

14. , Aquinas, Commentary on John, p. 252.Google Scholar

15. , Theophylact, Patrologia Graeca [PG] 123:1241: “kai dē apostolos ginetai, hupo tēs tēn kardian autēs perilabousēs pisteōs cheirotonētheia”.Google Scholar

16. , Aquinas, Commentary on John, p. 254.Google Scholar

17. Glossa Ordinaria, PL 114:374.Google Scholar

18. , Denis, Enarratio in johannem, p. 353.Google Scholar

19. , Bonaventure, Commentarius in Evangelium Ioannis, p. 299. According to Bonaventure, Jesus also appointed her as his witness in order to condemn the stubborness of the Jews, who would not believe the testimony of John the Baptist, while the Samaritans believed “one little woman” (uni mulierculae).Google Scholar

20. Oecolampadius, Johannes, Annotationes piae ac doclae in Evangelium lohannis (Basel, 1533), fol. 75r.Google Scholar

21. Musculus, Wolfgang, Commentariorum in evangelistam Ioannem, Heptasprima (Basel, 1545), p. 225: “Debebat dicere: Quare tu cum appereas vir gravis & honestus potum a me petis, quae sum vile scortum, ne alloquio quidem dignum?”Google Scholar

22. Calvin, John, The Gospel According to St. John 1–10, trans. Parker, T. H. L. (Grand Rapids, Mich., 1961), p. 90Google Scholar(Iohannes Calvini opera quae supersunt omnia [CO], ed. Baum, W., Cunitz, E., Reuss, E. [Berlin, 1863–1900] 47: 79): “Quid? an tibi fas est potum a me petere, quum vobis adeo profani simus?”Google Scholar

23. , Musculus, Commentarii in Ioannem, p. 116;Google Scholar, Oecolampadius, Annotationes, fol. 75r;Google Scholarand , Calvin, Gospel According to John, p. 93 (CO 47:81).Google Scholar

24. Bucer, Martin, Martini Buceri Opera Latino, 2: Enarratio in Evangelion lohannis, ed. Backus, Irena (Leiden, The Netherlands, 1988), p. 182.Google Scholar

25. , Musculus, Commentarii in Ioannem, p. 119.Google Scholar

26. , Oecolampadius, Annotaliones, fol. 77v;Google Scholar, Calvin, Gospel According to John, p. 93 (CO 47:82): “Tu quidem multas iactas, sed nihil video: si potes, re ipsa ostende.”Google Scholar

27. Bullinger, Heinrich, In Divinum lesu Christi Domini nostri Euangelium secundum Ioannem, Commentariorum libri X (Zurich, 1543), fol. 52v. Bullinger argues that while she could have responded petulantly to the Lord, she in fact spoke respectfully.Google Scholar

28. , Oecolampadius, Annotationes, fol. 79r–79v;Google Scholar, Bullinger, In Divinum Euangelium, fol. 54v;Google Scholar, Musculus, Commentarii in Ioannem, p. 122;Google Scholarand , Calvin, Gospel According to John, p. 94 (CO 47:84).Google Scholar

29. , Oecolampadius, Annotationes, fol. 78v–79r;Google Scholarand , Bullinger, In Divinum Euangelium, fol. 54v.Google Scholar

30. , Musculus, Commentarii, pp. 122–123.Google Scholar

31. , Bucer, Enarratio in Evangelion Iohannis, p. 189: “A propheta illico rogat de rebus divinis, non suis. Id indicat in ea semen Dei latuisse”;Google Scholarand , Calvin, Gospel According to John, p. 95 (CO 47:84).Google Scholar

32. , Oecolampadius, Annotationes, fol. 79r;Google Scholarand , Bullinger, In Divinum Euangelium, fol. 54r.Google Scholar

33. , Musculus, Commentarii, pp. 120–121, 144.Google Scholar

34. , Oecolampadius, Annotationes, fol. 83r–83v;Google Scholarand , Bullinger, In Divinum Enangelium, fol. 57v: “peccatrix, quae hactenus multis fuit ruinae caussa, nunc apostola & concionatrix facta.”Google Scholar

35. , Musculus, Commentarii, p. 143: “Expendamus & hoc, quod non per verbum Apostolorum, qui ad hoc erant a Christo electi ac missi, ut Euangelium praedicarent, sed per verbum mulieris crediderunt, personae inferioris sexus, & privatae, ad ministerium verbi non vocatae.”Google Scholar

36. , Calvin, Gospel According to John, p. 104 (CO 47:92): “solum tubae vel campanae officio fungitur ut ad Christum invitet.”Google Scholar

37. , Aquinas, Commentary on John, pp. 239–240.Google Scholar

38. , Bonaventure, Commentarius in Evangelium loanni, p. 291: “non est efficax praedicatio fidei nisi cum consensu liberi arbitrii; et liberum arbitrium non consentit, nisi excitetur a Deo.”Google Scholar

39. , Calvin, Gospel According to John, pp. 94, 90 (CO 47:83, 79).Google Scholar