Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:26:03.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Erosion of Postmillennialism in American Religious Thought, 1865–1925

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

James H. Moorhead
James H. Moorhead
Affiliation:
Associate professor of religion in North Carolina Sate University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1859 an influential theological quarterly asserted without fear of contradiction that postmillennialism was the “commonly received doctrine” among American Protestants; but by the early twentieth century, it had largely vanished, and Lewis Sperry Chafer, with only slight partisan exaggeration, could claim in 1936 that it was without “living voice”. In part, this change resulted from the defection of conservatives like Chafer to the expanding premillennial ranks, and several historians have told their story in detail. The disappearance of postmillennialism outside of premillennial quarters, however, has received scant attention. There—especially among the moderate to liberal Protestants with whom this article is chiefly concerned—the once dominant eschatology appears not to have suffered outright rejection but to have ebbed away. Although its remants endured as faith in progress, it gradually ceased to be a distinct biblically grounded eschatology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 61 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

I wish to acknowledge support for this study provided by the National Endowment for the Humanities and to thank Grant Wacker for his perceptive comments on an earlier draft of this essay.

1. “History of Opinions Respecting the Millennium,” American Theological Review 1 (1859): 655; Chafer, Lewis Sperry, foreword, in Feinberg, C. L., Millennialism (1936; reprint ed., Chicago, 1980), p. 9.Google Scholar

2. On the growth of premillennialism, see Sandeen, Ernest R., The Roots of Fundamentalism: British and American Millenarianism, 1800–1930 (Chicago, 1970);Google ScholarWeber, Timothy P., Living in the Shadow of the Second Coming: American Premillennialism, 1875–1925 (New York, 1979);Google Scholar and George Marsden, M., Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870–1925 (New York, 1980).Google ScholarQuandt, Jean, “Religion and Social Thought: The Secularization of Postmillennialism,” American Quarterly 25 (1973): 390–409,CrossRefGoogle Scholar is one of the few explicit treatments of postmillennialism after 1865. Hutchison, William R., The Modernist Impulse in American Protestantism (Cambridge, 1976),Google Scholar gives hints of the fate of postmillennialism among liberals. General works on American millennialism include Tuveson, Ernest L., Redeemer Nation: The Idea of America's Millennial Role (Chicago, 1968);Google Scholar and Bercovitch, Sacvan, The American Jeremiad (Madison, 1978).Google Scholar

3. Tuveson, , Redeemer Nation; Bercovitch, American Jeremiad. Samuel Harris, The Kingdom of Christ on Earth (Andover, 1874),Google Scholar offers a classic statement of the progressive evolutionary character of nineteenth-century postmillennialism as well as glimpses of its residual apocalypticism.

4. Ariès, Philippe, The Hour of Our Death (New York, 1981), p. 473.Google Scholar Aries discusses an earlier period of European history, but the description also fits American evangelicalism in the early 1800s.

5. Cross, George, “Millenarianism in Christian History,” Biblical World 46 (1915): 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Berg, Joseph F., The Second Advent of Jesus Christ, Not Premillennial (Philadelphia, 1859), p. 192.Google Scholar

7. “The Fulfilment of Prophecy,” Princeton Review 33 (1861): 84. For a sample of diversity, compare Read, Hollis, The Coming Crisis of the World (Columbus, 1861);Google Scholar and “The Millennium of Rev. XX,” Methodist Quarterly Review 25 (1843): 83–110. See also Whalen, Robert K., “Millenarianism and Millennialism in America, 1790–1880” (Ph.D. diss., State University of New York at Stony Brook, 1972).Google Scholar

8. Carpenter, J. Estlin, The Bible in the Nineteenth Century (London, 1903);Google ScholarCheyne, T. K., Founders of Old Testament Criticism (New York, 1893);Google Scholar and Kummel, Werner Georg, Das Neue Testament: Geschichte der Erforschung Seiner Pro bleme (Munich, 1958).Google Scholar

9. Stuart, Moses, Commentary on the Apocalypse, 2 vols. (Andover, 1845), 1:158, 2:353–395.Google ScholarBrown, Jerry Wayne, The Rise of Biblical Criticism in America, 1800–1870: The New England Scholars (Middletown, 1969),Google Scholar is an excellent guide. Unfortunately no comparable volume traces post-Civil War biblical studies. The Biblical Scholarship in North America series, recently begun by the Society of Biblical Literature, marks an important step toward meeting this need.

10. Briggs, Charles A., Messianic Prophecy (New York, 1891), pp. 34–45;Google ScholarRyder, William H., “The Fulfillment of Prohecy,” Andover Review 13 (1890): 21, 23, 24;Google ScholarFullerton, Kemper, Prophecy and Authority (New York, 1919), pp. 197, 199–200.Google Scholar

11. Peake, Arthur S., The Revelation of St. John (London, 1919), p. 368;Google ScholarGrant, Frederick C., “The Permanent Value of the Primitive Christian Eschatology,” Biblical World 49 (1917): 157;CrossRefGoogle ScholarMetcalf, Arthur, “The Parousia Versus the Second Advent,” Bibliotheca Sacra 64 (1907): 54, 55, 59;Google ScholarStormes, A. B., “The Heart of the Apocalypse,” Methodist Review 84 (1902): 99, 107;Google ScholarZenos, Andrew C., “Apocalyptic Symbolism,” Homiletic Review 65 (1913): 199.Google Scholar Behind this changed evaluation of apocalypticism lay the work of such scholars as R. H. Charles, Johannes Weiss, and Wilhelm Boussett. For surveys of important works influencing American thought, consult Robertson, A. T., “The Modern Preacher and the Apocalypse of John,” Homiletic Review 72 (1916): 354–359;Google Scholar and Geissinger, James Allen, “Recent Literature on the Book of Revelation,” Methodist Review 106 (1923): 24–35.Google Scholar

12. Case, Shirley Jackson, The Revelation of St. John (Chicago, 1919), p. 407;Google Scholaridem, The Millennial Hope (Chicago, 1918), pp. 215–225; “The Passing of Apocalypticism,” Biblical World 36 (1910): 147–151.

13. Brooks, s, “An Inquiry into the Meaning of Matthew XXIV, 1–36” Methodist Quarterly Review 52 (1870): 350–365.Google Scholar

14. Schweitzer, Albert, The Quest for the Historical Jesus (1906; reprint ed., New York, 1961);Google ScholarCastor, George D., “The Kingdom of God in Light of Jewish Literature,” Btbl. otheca Sacra 66 (1909): 352;Google ScholarRall, Harris F., Modern Prernillennialism and the Christian Hope (New York, 1920), pp. 56–74.Google Scholar

15. Hutchison, pp. 122–132, examines the influence of Harnack and Ritschl.

16. Brown, William B., The Problem of Final Destiny (New York, 1900), pp. 298, 299;Google ScholarRail, Harris F., The Coming Kingdom (New York, 1924), p. 26.Google Scholar

17. Merrill, S. M., The Second Coming of Christ (Cincinnati, 1879), pp. 13, 282.Google Scholar

18. Warren, Israel, The Parousia (Portland, 1879), p. 24;Google ScholarClarke, William N., An Outline of Christian Theology (New York, 1909), p. 444;Google Scholar Metcalf, p. 65; Campbell, James M., The Second Coming of Christ (New York, 1919), p. 70;Google ScholarParker, T. Valentine, “The Second Advent and Modern Thought,” Bibliotheca Sacra 68 (1911): 600.Google Scholar See also Smith, C. E., “Will the World Ever End?” Baptist Review 1 (1879): 305–312;Google ScholarCurry, Daniel, “The Future of Christ's Kingdom,” Methodist Review 69 (1887): 11–26;Google ScholarBarton, William E., “The Descent of the New Jerusalem,” Bibliotheca Sacra 52 (1895): 29–47;Google ScholarWhite, G. L., “The Parousia of Christ,” Homiletic Review 49 (1905): 37–40;Google Scholar and Urmy, William S., Christ Came Again (New York, 1900).Google Scholar

19. Mains, George P., Premillennialism (New York, 1920), p. 152.Google ScholarDavidson, James W., The Logic of Millennial Thought: Eighteenth-Century New England (New Haven, 1977),Google Scholar has compared the morphology of conversion to the Apocalypse—a comparison I would extend by adding notions of death and afterlife.

20. Grant, Peter, Light on the Grave, 3d ed. (New York, 1869), pp. 71–72;Google Scholar Berg, The Second Advent, pp. 250–251.

21. Boylan, Anne M., “The Role of Conversion in Nineteenth-Century Sunday Schools,” American Studies 20 (1979): 35–48;Google ScholarSizer, Sandra, Gospel Hymns and Social Religion: The Rhetoric of Nineteenth-Century Revivalism (Philadelphia, 1978), pp. 111–137.Google Scholar Although Moody was a moderate premillennialist, his influence extended to many postmillennialists as well. To what extent and in what fashion premillennialism was also transmuted by the forces affecting postmillennialism is a subject for further research. We need new analytic categories transcending the pre- and postmillennial typology; see Sandeen, Ernest R., “The ‘Little Tradition’ and the Form of Modern Millenarianism,” Annual Review of the Social Sciences of Religion 4 (1980): 165–180.Google Scholar

22. Brown, William A., Christian Theology in Outline (New York, 1906), pp. 410, 411;Google ScholarCoe, George A., The Religion of a Mature Mind (Chicago, 1902).Google Scholar

23. Stannard, David E., ed., Death in America (Philadelphia, 1975);CrossRefGoogle ScholarJackson, Charles O., Passing: The Vision of Death in America (Westport, 1977);Google Scholar and Farrell, James J., Inventing the American Way of Death, 1830–1920 (Philadelphia, 1980).Google Scholar

24. Bellamy, Joseph, Sermons Upon the Following Subjects (Boston, 1758), pp. 62–66;Google Scholar Charles G. Finney, in Oberlin Evangelist, 6 December 1843, p. 195; Morris, E. D., Is There Salvation After Death? (New York, 1887), pp. 237–238.Google Scholar

25. Hodge, Charles, Systematic Theology, 3 vols. (New York, 1874–1875), 3: 557.Google Scholar

26. Shedd, William G. T., The Doctrine of Endless Punishment, 2d ed. (New York, 1887), p. 159.Google Scholar

27. Progressive Orthodoxy (Boston, 1892), pp. 67–111.Google Scholar

28. McConnell, S. D., The Evolution of Immortality (New York, 1901), p. 85;Google ScholarAbbott, Lyman, Signs of Promise (New York, 1889), p. 301.Google Scholar

29. Gordon, George A., Immortality and the New Theodicy (Boston, 1897), pp. 78–79.Google Scholar

30. That Unknown Country (Springfield, 1891), pp. 395–396.Google Scholar This collection of essays by authors of various persuasions provides an excellent gauge of opinions on hell in the late 1800s. See also Rowell, Geoffrey, Hell and the Victorians (London, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31. That Unknown Country, p. 387; Rowlands, H. O., “The Present Drift in Eschatology,” Baptist Quarterly Review 11 (1889): 411.Google Scholar

32. See, for example, essays in defense of hell in That Unknown Country.

33. Phelps, Elizabeth S., Beyond the Gates (Boston, 1885), p. 47.Google Scholar See also Branks, William, Heaven Our Home, 3d ed. (Boston, 1864);Google ScholarBayard, Adeline J., Views of Heaven (Philadelphia, 1877);Google Scholar and Harbaugh, H., The Heavenly Recognition (Philadelphia, 1856).Google Scholar

34. Kimball, H. D., Beyond the Horizon (New York, 1896), p. 229;Google ScholarUlyat, William C., The First Years of the Life of the Redeemed After Death (New York, 1901), p. 30.Google Scholar

35. Lemon, W. P., “The Pulpit and Eternal Punishment,” Homiletic Review 81 (1921): 362–363;Google ScholarVernon, S. M., Probation and Punishment (New York, 1886), p. 290.Google Scholar

36. Brown, Richard D., “The Emergence of Urban Society in Rural Massachusetts, 1760–1820,” Journal of American History 61 (1974): 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar On the United Front, see Foster, Charles I., An Errand of Mercy (Chapel Hill, 1960).Google Scholar

37. Mathews, Donald, “The Second Great Awakening as an Organizing Process, 1780–1830: An Hypothesis,” American Quarterly 21 (1969): 23–43;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Scott, Donald M., From Office to Profession: The New England Ministry, 1750–1850 (Philadelphia, 1978), pp. 36–51.Google Scholar

38. Emerson, Joseph, Lectures on the Millennium (Boston, 1818);Google ScholarCogswell, William, The Harbinger of the Millennium (Boston, 1833).Google Scholar

39. Foster, , Errand of Mercy, pp. 249–274.Google Scholar

40. Rosenberg, Carroll Smith, Religion and the Rise of the American City: The New York City Mission Movement, 1812–1870 (Ithaca, 1971);Google ScholarVeysey, Lawrence R., The Emergence of the American University (Chicago, 1965);Google ScholarOleson, Alexandra and John, Voss, eds., The Organization of Knowledge in Modern America (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar

41. Wiebe, Robert H., The Search for Order, 1877–1920 (New York, 1967);Google ScholarWeinstein, James, The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State (Boston, 1968).Google Scholar

42. Strong, Josiah, The New Era (New York, 1893),Google Scholar especially p. 30. Hopkins, C. Howard, The Rise of the Social Gospel in American Protestantism, 1865–1915 (New Haven, 1940),Google Scholar remains the best comprehensive treatment of the social gospel.

43. Mathews, Shailer, “Theological Seminaries as Schools of Religious Efficiency,” Biblical World 47 (1916): 84;CrossRefGoogle ScholarErnst, Eldon, Moment of Truth for Protestant America: Interchurch Campaigns Following World War One (Missoula, 1972);Google ScholarPrimer, Ben, Protestants and American Business Methods (Ann Arbor, 1979).Google Scholar

44. Eckman, George, The Return of the Redeemer (New York, 1920), pp. 257–258;Google ScholarEverhart, R. O., “Engineering and the Millennium,” Methodist Review 96 (1914): 44.Google Scholar

45. Goodenow, Smith, “We Shall Not All Sleep,” Bibliotheca Sacra 49 (1892): 668;Google ScholarMullins, E. Y., Christianity at the Crossroads (New York, 1924), pp. 30, 151.Google Scholar

46. Weber, , Living in the Shadow of the Second Coming, p. 40.Google Scholar

47. Marsden, , Fundamentalism and American Culture, pp. 141–195;Google ScholarAhlstrom, Sydney E., A Religious History of the American People (New Haven, 1972), pp. 733–824.Google Scholar