Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T14:38:24.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Johanninc Commentary of Friar Thomas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

James A. Weisheipl
James A. Weisheipl
Affiliation:
Professor of the history of medieval science in theUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1894 Heinrich Denifle showed conclusively that the official textbook of masters in theology in the medieval university was the Bible. At one time historians commonly assumed that masters in theology lectured on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, a most subtle and thought-provoking book. There are so many medieval commentaries on the Sentences, both published and unpublished, and so many great masters did in fact comment on the Sentences that it was easy enough to assume that this was the set text for masters in the universities. Today there can be no doubt. Normally only bachelors lectured on the Sentences before being promoted to the rank of master. Once the young man became a master in sacred theology, he was not allowed to lecture on the Lombard. His task was to lecture on the sacred scriptures, and his official title was magister in sacra pagina, Master of the Sacred Page.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , June 1976 , pp. 185 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Denifle, H., “Quel livre servait de base a l'enseignement des Mitrea en Thélogie dans d 'Unlversité de Paris,” Revue Thorniste 2 (1894): 129–161.Google Scholar

2. Stegmüfler, F., Repertothim Commentariorum in Sententias Petri Lombardi, 2 vols. (Würzburg: Schoöningh, 1947).Google Scholar

3. Glorieux, P., Repertoire des maitres en théolgie de Paris au X1IIe siecle, 2 vols. (Paris: Vrin, 1933).Google Scholar

4. Bacon, Roger, Opus Minus (1267),Google Scholared. Brewer, J. S., in Opera quaedam haotenus inedita (London: Rolls Series [hereafter R.S.], 15), p. 329.Google Scholar

5. Principe, W., The Theology of the Hyposfatic, Union in the Ear1y Thirteenth Century, 4 vols. (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies. 1967-), 2:14.Google Scholar

6. Alexander, of Hales, , Glossa in Quatuor Libros Sententiarurn Petri Lombardi, ed. PP. Bonaventurae, collegii S. (Quaracehi: Collegium S. Bouaventurae, 1951.), 1:18*–44*.Google Scholar

7. Groseeteste, , Epistolae, ed. Luard, H. B. (London: R. S., 1861), p. 347.Google Scholar See Long, R. James, “The Science of Theology According to Richard Fishacre,” Mediaeval Studies 34 (1972): 72–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis, ed. H. Denifle and E. Chatelain, 4 vols. (Paris, 1889), 1, no. 82:140–141.Google Scholar

9. Pete, Cantor, Verbum abbreviatum, chap. 1,Google Scholar i n Patrologia Latina (hereafter PL), comp. J. P. Migne, 205:25.Google Scholar

10. For a recent, comprehensive discussion of the faculty of theology at Paris in the Middle Ages, see Glorieux, P., “L'Euseignement au Moyen Age: Techniques et méthodes en usage à la Faculté de Théologie de Paris au XIIIe siècle,” Archiie d'hisfoire doctrinaire et litteraire du Moyen Age 43 (1968): 65–186.Google Scholar

11. Aquinas, Thomas, Summa theologiae, 1. q. 1,Google Scholar a. 8 ad 2.

12. See Weisheipl, R. A., The Place of Study in the Ideal of St. Dominic” (River Forest: Dominican House of Studies, 1960)Google Scholar; Hinnebusch, W. A., The History of the Dominican Order (New York: Alba, 1973), pp. 3–36.Google Scholar

13. Glorioux, , “L'Enseignement,” p. 114.Google Scholar

14. Gui, Bernard, Legenda S. Thomae, in Thomae Aquinatis Vitae Fontes Pracipuae, ed. Ferrua, A., O.P. (Alba: Ed. Domenicane, 1968), P. 142,Google Scholar n. 22

15. See Mandonnet, P.. Des Ecrites authentiques de saint Thomas d'Aquin, 2d ed. rev, and corr. (Fribourg: S. Paul, 1910), p. 31, n. 63Google Scholar; also listed in Ferrua, , Fontes Praecipuae, p. 331.Google Scholar

16. Trevet, Nicholas, Annales sex regum Angliae, ed. Hog, Thomas (London: English Historical Society, 1845), p. 290.Google Scholar

17. William, of Tocco, , Hystoria Beati Thomas. cap. 43,Google Scholar in Ferrua, , Fontes Praeoipuae, p. 88.Google Scholar

18. Gui, , Legenda, cap. 34,Google Scholar in Ferrua, , Fontes Praecipuae, p. 169.Google Scholar

19. Processus canonizationis s. Thomas Aquinatis, Neapoli, In Ferrua, , Fontes Praectpuae, p. 318.Google Scholar

20. Ibid., p. 297.

21. See Weisheipl, J. A., Friar Thomas d'Aquino (New York: Doubleday, 1974), pp. 121–122.Google Scholar

22. Ibid., pp. 171–173.

23. Aquinas, Thomas, Caena Aurea, Epistola dedicatoria, 4 vols. (Turin: Marietil, 1925), 1:468.Google Scholar

24. Ibid.

25. Geenen, G., “St. Thomas et les Pères,” Dictionnaire de Thélogie Catholique, 15, 1:743.Google Scholar See list of Fathers given by de Rubeis, Bernar in Dissertationes Critieae et Apologetioae, Diss. 5, cap. 3,Google Scholar in Aquinatis, Thomae, Opera Omnia, Leonine edition (Vatican, 1882.), 1:cviii–cix.Google Scholar

26. See list in Bartholomew of Capua's deposition, in Ferrua, , Fontes Praecipuae, p. 331.Google Scholar

27. Tolomeo, of Lueca, , Hist. Eccles., bk. 23,Google Scholar chap. 15.

28. Ibid., p. 331.

29. Aquinatis, S. Thornae, Super Evangelium S. loannis Lectura, ed. Cai, R. (Turin: Marletti, 1952),Google Scholar Prol, n. 10. All references to the text of the Johannine commentary are to this edition, which is nicely edited and printed.

30. Jerome, , Liber de viris iliustribus, c. 9,Google Scholar in PL 23:654.Google Scholar

31. See the text edited by Uccelli from original autographs, Aquinatis, S. Thomae, ln Isaiam Prohetam. ed. Uccelli, P. A. (Rome, 1880), pp. 47–49Google Scholar on chap. 6:1.

32. Summa contra Gentiles, 1, chap. 13.

33. Lectura super Johannem, ed. Cal, Prol., n. 10.

34. Brown, R. E., The Gospel According to John, The Anchor Bible, no. 29 (New York: Doubleday, 1966), pp. 533–538.Google Scholar

35. Lectura super Johannem, ed. Cai, §192; also §1179, §1290, §1792.