Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T11:28:04.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MENANDER, DYSCOLVS 750: A NOTE ON STAGING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2017

David J. Jacobson
David J. Jacobson*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
*
davidj@berkeley.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent article, I discussed vocative uses of οὗτος in the works of Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides and Aristophanes, showing that there are two types of vocatives: ‘calls’, which are utterance-initial and directed at one whose attention is turned elsewhere, and ‘addresses’, which are non-initial, employed by a speaker who is already conversing with a hearer, and typically indicate a speaker's annoyance at the hearer. Menander uses οὗτος as a vocative in the same ways as the other dramatic poets, but there is one instance in Dyscolus that has been routinely misconstrued and merits clarification.

Type
Shorter Notes
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , May 2017 , pp. 299 - 301
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jacobson, D.J., ‘Vocative ΟΥΤΟΣ in Greek drama,’ CPh 110 (2015), 193–214 Google Scholar.

2 E.g. van Groningen, B.A., Menander Dyskolos (Leiden, 1960), 45 Google Scholar; Treu, M., Menander Dyskolos (Munich, 1960), 69 Google Scholar; J.-M. Jacques, Ménandre, tome I2: Le Dyscolos (Paris, 1963), 109; Handley, E.W., The Dyskolos of Menander (Cambridge, MA, 1965), 262 Google Scholar; Casson, L., The Plays of Menander (New York, 1971), 34 Google Scholar; Gomme, A.W. and Sandbach, F.H., Menander A Commentary (Oxford, 1973), 248 Google Scholar; Arnott, W.G., Menander I (Cambridge, MA, 1979), 305 Google Scholar; Miller, N., Menander Plays and Fragments (London, 1987), 42 Google Scholar; Balme, M., Menander The Plays and Fragments (Oxford, 2001), 32 Google Scholar; Ferrari, F., Menandro e la Commedia Nuova (Turin, 2001), 157 Google Scholar. Some choose to leave οὗτος untranslated, implying, I believe, that the address is in some way redundant with the second person of σοι and/or ’νόχλει, e.g. Vellacott, P., Menander The Bad-Tempered Man, or The Misanthrope (London, 1960), 36 Google Scholar; D'Atri, S., ‘The Grouch’, in Slavitt, D.R. and Bovie, P. (edd.), Menander (Philadelphia, 1998), 53 Google Scholar.

3 While the verb ἐνοχλέω unequivocally expresses annoyance, οὗτος does not, on which see Jacobson (n. 1).

4 Diano, C., Note in margine al Dyskolos di Menandro (Padua, 1959), 61–2Google Scholar also gives οὗτος to Gorgias, but for a very different reason. He argues that Gorgias gestures toward Sostratus as he begins the sentence οὗτος βούλεται ἐντυχεῖν σοι, but Cnemon interrupts him after the first word. The paragraphos and the abbreviation ΚΝΗΜ in the margin at 750, on which see Martin, V., Papyrus Bodmer IV (Geneva, 1958), 78 Google Scholar and plate 16, do not necessarily indicate that there is a change of speaker at the beginning of 750, for there are other instances in the papyrus where a paragraphos, sometimes coupled with a speaker's name in the margin, indicates a new speaker within the line. On the imprecision of paragraphoi, see Martin (this note), 10 and Pope, M., ‘Changes of speaker in Papyrus Bodmer IV’, AClass 3 (1960), 40–52 Google Scholar.

5 What Cnemon is sitting on is not explicitly defined by text, and so interpretations vary widely. For the most up-to-date discussion of this issue, see O'Bryhim, S., ‘Conveying Knemon (Menander Dyskolos 758)’, CPh 109 (2014), 263–6Google Scholar, who makes the interesting suggestion that Cnemon has been wheeled out on a cart used for transporting manure.

6 It is possible that Gorgias speaks the first half of the line (οὗτος, εἴρηχ’ ὅσ’ ἐφρόνουν σοι), the final four words referring to the sentiments expressed in 748–9, and that Cnemon completes the verse. This could add some humour to the scene as Cnemon's three successive replies to Gorgias would all be negative (μὴ ’νόχλει, πρὸς τῶν θεῶν, 750; μηδαμῶς, πρὸς τῶν θεῶν, 751; οὐδὲν ἔτι τοιούτων μοι μέλει, 752). A potential objection to this is Menander's preference for varying where in these antilabic trochaic tetrameters there is a change of speaker, on which see Gomme and Sandbach (n. 2), 248.

7 I would like to thank the anonymous reader of CQ, whose helpful suggestions improved this paper.