Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:09:57.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ovidiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

D. R. Shackleton Bailey
D. R. Shackleton Bailey
Affiliation:
Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 4 , Issue 3-4 , December 1954 , pp. 165 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 165 note 1 C.R. xi (1897), 289.Google Scholar

page 165 note 2 If Housman's point against est fraudis were valid, sua pars est laudis would be better than his mooted a, pars est laudis: a, pars et fraudis: a, pars sua fraudis.

page 169 note 1 Not to be confounded with modo in the second of two parallel clauses lacking a correlating modo (or its equivalent) in the first: see Housman, on Man. 1. 871.Google Scholar