Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:34:30.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Posidonivs Myth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

J. F. Dobson
Affiliation:
The University, Bristol

Extract

Posidonivs was fortunate to be born in an age when the Romans had begun to recognize their own intellectual limitations, and had turned for guidance to a hitherto despised nation, admitted by themselves to be as much their superior in originality as it was inferior to them in practical matters. He was, moreover, the official exponent of a philosophical system which, destined as it was to exercise for hundreds of years the strongest moral influence over the world, had already taken a firm hold on the more thoughtful minds at Rome. Probably any Greek teacher of ability had, in the time of Cicero, a good chance to make a name; Posidonius, who was a man of considerable intellectual gifts, great learning, and some originality, and who was, moreover, the accredited successor to Zeno and Chrysippus, obtained a reputation which lasted for some centuries.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1918

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Suidas.

2 Strabo, VII. 316.

3 Plutarch, , Marius, p. 432Google Scholar.

4 Strabo, XI. 752.

5 ad Att. II. 1.

6 Suidas.

7 Religions Experience of the Roman People, p. 382.

8 Histoire de la Divination dans l'Antiquité, vol. i., p. 68.

9 Stobaeus, , Ed. Phys. I. 27. IGoogle Scholar.

10 Cf. Diels, , Doxog. Gr. p. 19Google Scholar.

11 Four Stages of Greek Religion, p. 139.

12 Galen, , de Hippocratis et Platonis placitis, V. p. 449Google Scholar.

13 Ecclesiasticus, 44. 3–15.

14 I am relying throughout on the third edition of Norden (1903); I have not had access to the new edition published in 1917.

15 Die hellenistisch-römische Kultur, pp. 84, 85.

16 Op. dt., 382–83; Roman Ideas of Deity, p. 58.

17 Galen, , H. et P. IX. 653Google Scholar.

18 Cf. Fr. Hultsch, , Posidonios über die Grösse der Some, pp. 1113Google Scholar.

19 Cicero, , Tusc. V. 107Google Scholar.

20 ‘Such are the sublime effusions in which the mystic eloquence of a Posidonius delights.’ Op. cit. p. 145.

21 Cycl. Theor. II. I. 89.

22 Ibid. II. 1. 89, cf. Strabo, III. 138; Tatius, Achilles, Isag. 13Google Scholar.

23 Cleomedes, , Cycl. Theor. II. 7Google Scholarad fin.

24 Op. cit., pp. 84, 144–5.

25 Diog. Laert. VII. 138.

26 Galen, , de H. et P. V. pp. 448–9Google Scholar.

27 Diog. Laert. VII. 149; Cicero, , Dediu. I. 125Google Scholar.

28 Cicero, , De diu. I. 64Google Scholar.

29 Ibid. I. 130.

30 Ibid. II. 35.

31 Strabo, IV. 198.

32 Bevan, Edwyn, Stoics and Sceptics, p. 96Google Scholar.

33 Epiphan, . adu. Haeres. III. 42Google Scholar.

34 Diog. Laert. VII. 128, who says that Panaetius thought so too.

35 Ibid. 124.

36 Strabo III. 212.

37 For the list of his works see Bake, , Posidonii Rhodii Reliquiae Doctrinae, 1812Google Scholar.

38 Ep. 90.

39 Note that some Stoics considered such attention to practical details superfluous.

40 Strabo, III. 138.

41 Cicero, , N.D. II. 34Google Scholar.

42 Cleomedes, I. 10. 51 and II. 1. 79.

43 Pliny, , N.H. 2, 21Google Scholar.

44 For the position of Panaetius and for the most thorough and consistent exposition of Stoicism in general I must refer to Professor Arnold's Roman Stoicism.

45 Plutarch, , Plac. II. 9Google Scholar.

46 Diog. Laert. VII. 13–9.

47 Ibid. 149.

48 Epit. I. 29.

49 Diog. Laert. VII. 54.

50 Galen, , H. et P. V. p. 441Google Scholar (M).

51 Arnold, , Roman Stoicism, p. 133Google Scholar.

52 Galen, , op. cit. V. 442Google Scholar. ai τoû σώμaτos kpáσειs οίκείas έauτaîs έργáζονται τàs лαθητικàs κινńσειs.

53 Sext. Emp. Math. VII. 93.

54 Aetius, , Placita, IV. 13–3Google Scholar.

55 Galen, öτι ταίs τοû σώματοs κρáσεσιν κ.τ.λ. p. 78,§ 8, and H. et P. V. 439; and Diog. Laert. VII. 91.

56 Galen, , H. et P. V. p. 450Google Scholar.

57 Clem. Alexandr. II. 21.

58 Galen, , H. et P. V. 461Google Scholar, etc.; IX. 653.

59 Ibid. V. 448.

60 Ibid. VII. 584.

61 Galen, , H. et P. IV. 362Google Scholar, 394.

62 Diog, Laert VII. 138–9.