Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:22:12.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Lyric Fragments Reconsidered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

M. L. West
M. L. West
Affiliation:
Bedford College,London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I Want to comment on five passages where I have provoked disagreement by a previous discussion. In the first three, my discussion was in Philologus cx (1966), 152–4, and my critic is Bruno Gentili in Quaderni Urbinati iv (1967), 177–81. I was not the first to make an emendation in any of the three places, so that in defending the transmitted text Gentili is actually not only criticizing me but others such as Hermann, Naeke, O. Müller, Schoemann, Hunt, Murray, and Page.

Type
Shorter Notes
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , December 1975 , pp. 307 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 307 note 1 The following five notes were originally accepted for publication by the editors of Classical Review as long ago as 1972. Thai Journal has now ceased to print articles, and the Classical Quarterly is here publishing, with a delay for which the editors apologize, part of the accumulated backlog.

page 308 note 1 Wilamowitz, Gr. Lesebuch, Erläuterungen, 104, Sappho u. Sim., 141 n.; Schroeder, O., Grundriss d. gr. Versgeschichte, 99; Dale, C.Q. xlv (1951), 119Google Scholar f.; Snell, Gr. Metrik, 41; Korzeniewski, D., Gr. Metrik, 142.,Google Scholar