Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 56 note 1 To whom I am indebted for much assistance and advice on this paper.
page 56 note 2 C.I.L. vi. 1984. 9.
page 56 note 3 Eph. epigr. 2. 58.
page 56 note 4 For the evidence see Clark, Q. Asconii Pediani Commentarii, pp. v–vi.
page 56 note 5 See index to C.I.L. v, especially nos. 2820, 2829, 2848, 2899, 2937.
page 56 note 6 Dessau 257.
page 56 note 7 See Conway and Johnson, Prae-Italic Dialects of Italy i p. 259 f.
page 56 note 8 C.I.L. v. 2921, 2923.
page 56 note 9 C.I.L. v. 839, 877.
page 56 note 10 See R.-E. (zweite Reihe) 3A. 1. col. 77 ff.
page 56 note 11 C.I.L. xiv. 2653.
page 57 note 1 The lost ‘liber contra obtrectatores Vergilii’ of Asconius and Sil. Pun. viii. 593–4.
page 57 note 2 See Sil. Pun. viii. 406.
page 57 note 3 See Rehm, Philologus, Supplbd. xxiv. 2. 97 f.
page 57 note 4 R.-E. sup. cit. col. 87 f.
page 58 note 1 Epictet. disser. iii. 8. 7.
page 58 note 2 Pliny Ep. iii. 7. 1.
page 58 note 3 Quoted from the Loeb edition of J. D. Duff.
page 58 note 4 Sandys, Latin Epigraphy 2 p. 217.