^{page 349 note 1} From my pamphlet On Certain Manuscripts of Propertius, published as a part of vol. iv. of the Transactions of the Cambridge Philological Society, 1894.

^{page 350 note 1} As Baehrens misdated every one of the Propertian MSS. that he used except F, whose first owners' names are written inside it (Classical Review, ix. p. 182), it is not extravagant to suggest that novices may be mistaken.

^{page 350 note 2} The courtesy of Prof. Schmidt, the Librarian of Görlitz, now enables me to give the opinion of two other eyewitnesses. He writes ‘“padue 1469” is written in different and paler ink but by the same hand. Prof. Dr. Fecht, the Secretary of the Oberlausitzsche Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, agrees with this opinion.’ The word finis is of course by the scribe.

^{page 351 note 1} Baehrens' silence about F cannot be trusted; see op. cit. pp. 56 sqq.

^{page 351 note 2} I use this symbol for the whole of our MS authority AFDLNV as in the notes to the Corpus text of Propertius. Herr Koehler's use of it is similar.

^{page 352 note 1} Signor Rasi goes so far as to say of this manuscript that it is ‘omnium praestantissimus post codicem Neapolitanum quo socio optime ualeatad textum Propertianum statuendum.’