No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 63 note 1 Herod. 6, 19; 
.
page 64 note 1 References in F. Cauer, Branchidai in Pauly-Wissowa.
page 64 note 2 See generally Haussoullier, B., Études sur l' Histoire de Milet et du Didymeion (1902); and notes to O.G.I.S. 472. It was waste in 332/1; Callisthenes ap. Strabo. 17, 814. Haussoullier suggests that Callisthenes' story of the spring gushing forth again means that the Milesians had already begun to clear the site. But seepost.Google Scholar
page 64 note 3 To Arrian, Arimazes is unknown; while Diodorus is lost. But Polyaen. 4, 3, 29, which differs considerably from Curtius' version of the siege, probably represents the Cleitarchean tradition; it knows nothing of the supposed crucifixion.
page 64 note 4 Just. 11, 3, 6, ‘eadem indulgentia usurus,’ etc., which is certainly not Ptolemy.
page 66 note 1 Paus. 1, 16, 3; cf. O.G.I.S. 213, 214.
page 66 note 2 Wilamowitz, Gött. Gel. Anz., 1914, p. 72.
page 66 note 3 Kleine Schriften (1910), p. 286, n. 1.