Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:42:40.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expandability- layer stacking relationship during experimental alteration of a Wyoming bentonite in pH 13.5 solutions at 35 and 60°C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

F. Rassineux ,
L. Griffault ,
A. Meunier ,
G. Berger ,
S. Petit ,
P. Vieillard ,
R. Zellagui  and
M. Munoz
F. Rassineux*
Affiliation:
Etude Recherche Matériaux (ERM) - Bât. G.O.N , 40 avenue du Recteur Pineau, 86022 Poitiers Cedex
L. Griffault
Affiliation:
ANDRA—DS/HG, Parc de la Croix Blanche, 1—7 rue Jean Monnet, 92298 Châtenay-Malabry Cedex
A. Meunier
Affiliation:
HYDRASA—UMR-CNRS 6532, Université Poitiers, Bât. G.O.N., 40 avenue du Recteur Pineau, 86022 Poitiers Cedex
G. Berger
Affiliation:
LMTG—UMR 5563, Université Paul Sabatier, 38 rue des 36 Ponts, 31400 Toulouse, France
S. Petit
Affiliation:
HYDRASA—UMR-CNRS 6532, Université Poitiers, Bât. G.O.N., 40 avenue du Recteur Pineau, 86022 Poitiers Cedex
P. Vieillard
Affiliation:
HYDRASA—UMR-CNRS 6532, Université Poitiers, Bât. G.O.N., 40 avenue du Recteur Pineau, 86022 Poitiers Cedex
R. Zellagui
Affiliation:
HYDRASA—UMR-CNRS 6532, Université Poitiers, Bât. G.O.N., 40 avenue du Recteur Pineau, 86022 Poitiers Cedex
M. Munoz
Affiliation:
LMTG—UMR 5563, Université Paul Sabatier, 38 rue des 36 Ponts, 31400 Toulouse, France
*
*E-mail: françois.rassineux@erm.univ-poitiers.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The reaction of a Wyoming-type bentonite with pH 13.5 solutions was investigated experimentally at 35 and 60°C for periods of 1 to 730 days. Some crystal properties of the starting montmorillonitic clay remain unchanged, i.e. stability of the octahedral sheet, total cation exchange capacity (CEC) and CEC after neutralization of the octahedral charge, full expandability in the Casaturated state, and size distribution. Other properties are changed, e.g. there is an increase in the expandability after octahedral charge neutralization; a slight increase in the average layer charge; a decrease of the total surface area; and a particle morphological change from flakes to hexagonal shape.

The composition and the structure of the smectite layers did not change significantly during the reaction. The increasing number of expandable layers after octahedral charge neutralization is attributed to modifications in the stacking sequence. The number of interlayers surrounded by two charged tetrahedral sheets increases with reaction time.

Keywords

expandabilitytetrahedral chargeexperimentsmontmorillonitehigh pH
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 2001 , pp. 197 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altaner, S.P. & Ylagan, R.F. (1997) Comparison of structural models of mixed-layer illite/smectite and reaction mechanisms of smectite illitization. Clays Clay Miner. 45, 517–533.Google Scholar
Brusewitz, A.M. (1986) Chemical and physical properties of Palaeozoic potassium bentonites from Kinnekul le, Sweden. Clays Clay Miner. 34, 442–454.Google Scholar
Cuadros, J. & Altaner, S.P. (1998) Characterization of mixed-layer illite-smectite from bentonites using microscopic, chemic al, and X-ray methods: Constraints on the smectite-to-illite transformation mechanism. Am. Miner. 83, 762–774.Google Scholar
Cuadros, J. & Linares, J. (1996) Experimental kinetic study of the smectite- to- illite transformat ion. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 60, 439–453.Google Scholar
Eslinger, E., Highsmith, P., Albers, D. & DeMayo, B. (1979) Role of iron reduction in the conversion of smectite to illite in bentonites in the Disturbed Belt, Montana. Clays Clay Miner. 27, 327–338.Google Scholar
Greene-Kelly, R. (1953) The identification of montmorillonoids in clays. J. Soil Sci. 4, 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, M.D., Carter, D.L. & Gonzalez, C.L. (1965) The ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME) technique for determining soil-surface area. Soil Sci. 100, 409–413.Google Scholar
Hofmann, U. & Klemen, E. (1950) Loss of exchangeability of lithium ions in bentonite on heating. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 262, 95–99.Google Scholar
Howard, J.J. & Roy, D.M. (1985) Development of layer charge and kinetics of experimental smectite alteration. Clays Clay Miner. 33, 81–88.Google Scholar
Huang, W.L., Longo, J.M. & Pevear, D.R. (1993) An experimentally derived kinetic model for smectiteto-illite conversion and its use as a geothermometer. Clays Clay Miner. 41, 162–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, W.D. & Turkmenoglü, A.G. (1981) Chemical characteristics and origin of Ordovician K-bentonites along the Cincinnati Arch. Clays Clay Miner. 29, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, A. (1983) Potassium fixation by clay minerals during hydrothermal treatment. Clays Clay Miner. 31, 81–91.Google Scholar
Inoue, A., Bouchet, A., Velde, B. & Meunier, A. (1989) A convenient technique to estimate smectite layer percentage in randomly interstratified illite/smectite minerals. Clays Clay Miner. 37, 227–234.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.L. (1969) Soil Chemical Analyses, 4th edition. Prentice Hall Inc., New Delhi.Google Scholar
Lindgreen, H., Jacobsen, H. & Jakobsen, H. (1991) Diagenetic structural transformations in North sea Jurassic illite-smectite. Clays Clay Miner. 39, 54–69.Google Scholar
Madejova, J., Kraus, I. & Komadel, P. (1995) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic characterization of dioctahedral smectites and illites from the main Slovak deposits. Geol. Carpath. Series Clays, 4, 23–32.Google Scholar
Meunier, A. , Lanson, B. & Beaufort, D. (2000) Vermiculitization of smectite interfaces and illite layer growth as a possible dual model for I-S illitization in diagenetic environments: a synthesis. Clay Miner. 35, 573–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olis, A.C., Malla, P.B. & Douglas, L.A. (1990) The rapid estimation of the layer charges of 2:1 expanding clays from a single alkylammonium ion expansion. Clay Miner. 25, 39–50.Google Scholar
Petit, S., Righi, D., Madejova, J. & Decarreau, A. (1998) Layer charge estimation of smectites using infrared spectroscopy. Clay Miner. 33, 579–591.Google Scholar
Petit, S., Prot, T., Decarreau, A., Mosser, C. & Toledo-Groke, M. C. (1992) Crystallochemical study of a population of particles in smectites from a lateritic weathering profile. Clays Clay Miner. 40, 436–445.Google Scholar
Robertson, H.E. & Lahann, R.W. (1981) Smectite to illite conversion rates: effects of solution chemistry. Clays Clay Miner. 29, 129–135.Google Scholar
Środoń, J., Morgan, D.J., Eslinger, E., Eberl, D.D. & Karlinger, M.R. (1986) Chemistry of illite/smectite and end-member illite. Clays Clay Miner. 34, 368–378.Google Scholar
Velde, B. (1985) Clay Minerals: a Physical Explanation of their Occurrence. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Whitney, G. (1990) Role of water in the smectite-to-illite reaction. Clays Clay Miner. 38, 343–350.Google Scholar
Whitney, G. & Northrop, H.R. (1988) Experimental investigation of the smectite to illite reaction. Dual reaction mechanisms and oxygen-isotope systematics. Am. Miner. 73, 77–90.Google Scholar