Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:06:45.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hysteresis in the crystalline swelling of montmorillonite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

B. G. Laffer ,
A. M. Posner  and
J. P. Quirk
B. G. Laffer
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia
A. M. Posner
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia
J. P. Quirk
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The crystalline swelling of sodium and potassium montmorillonites immersed respectively in solutions of sodium and potassium chloride of different concentration exhibits hysteresis in the swelling-contraction cycles. The position and extent of the hysteresis can be varied by altering the method of preparation of the clays; in all cases the hysteresis loops for potassium montmorillonite were more extensive than those for sodium montmorillonite.

The results have been explained in terms of a structural rigidity of montmorillonite crystals, where the crystals consist of five to ten aluminosilicate sheets (lamellae). The extent of hysteresis depends on this rigidity, which varies in a co-operative manner with the spacing between the lamellae in the crystal.

Electrical interactions between pairs of lamellae are also considered in analysing the swelling behaviour.

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 1966 , pp. 311 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barshad, I. (1952) Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 16, 176.Google Scholar
Everett, D.H. & Whitton, W.I. (1952) Trans. Faraday Soc. 48, 749.Google Scholar
Hendricks, S.B.. Nelson, R.A. & Alexander, L.T. (1940) J. Am. chem. Soc. 62, 1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, C.A. & Jordine, E.ST.A. (1964) J. chem. Phys. 41, 2735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordine, E.ST.A., Steele, B.J. & Wolfe, J.D. (1965) Bull. chem. Soc. Japan. 38, 199.Google Scholar
Low, P.F. (1961) Adv. Agron. 13. 269.Google Scholar
Mooney, R.W., Keenan, A.G. & Wood, L.A. (1952) J. Am. chem. Soc. 74, 1371.Google Scholar
Norrish, K. (1954) Discuss. Faraday Soc. 18, 120.Google Scholar
Norrish, K. & Quirk, J.P. (1954) Nature, Lond. 173, 255.Google Scholar
Van Olphen, H. (1965) J. Colloid Sci. 20, 822.Google Scholar
Posner, A.M. & Quirk, J.P. (1964a) Proc. R. Soc. A, 278, 35.Google Scholar
Posner, A.M. & Quirk, J.P. (1964b) J. Colloid Sci. 19, 798.Google Scholar
Walker, G.F. (1956) Nature, Lond. 177, 239.Google Scholar