Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:24:23.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The mineralogy of some Upper Chalk samples from the Arundel area, Sussex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

A. H. Weir
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts
J. A. Catt
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts

Abstract

Seven samples, representative of all zones of the Upper Chalk in the Arundel area of Sussex, were treated with acetic acid and the residues analysed to determine their mechanical and mineralogical compositions. The sand and silt fractions of the residues consist mainly of flint and opaline silica, collophane, limonite, and quartz, and the clay fractions consist of montmorillonite, mica, quartz, and apatite. Authigenic apatite and quartz occur in the clay and silt and authigenic alkali feldspar in the silt. The montmorillonite may also be authigenic.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avery, B.W., Stephen, I., Brown, G. & Yaalon, D.H. (1959) J. Soil Sci. 10, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bascomb, C.L. (1964) J. Sci. Fd Agric. 15, 821.Google Scholar
Bjerrum, N. (1958) Mat.-fys. Meddr. 31, 1. Trans M.H. Rand, AERE-Trans. 841.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1961) The X-ray Identification and Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals, 2nd edn (Brown, G., editor), Chap. 8, p. 467. Mineralogical Society, London.Google Scholar
Brown, G. & Ollier, C D. (1956) Mineralog. Mag. 31, 339.Google Scholar
Cayeux, L. (1890) Annls Soc. géol. N. 17, 342.Google Scholar
Cayeux, L. (1891a) Annls Soc. géol. N. 18, 168.Google Scholar
Cayeux, L. (1891b) Annls Soc. géol. N. 19, 132.Google Scholar
Cayeux, L. (1895) C.r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, 120, 1068.Google Scholar
Cayeux, L. (1897) Mém, Soc. geol. N. 26, 168.Google Scholar
Double, I.S. (1927) Jl R. microsc. Soc. 47, 226.Google Scholar
Gaster, C.T.A. (1937) Proc. Geol. Ass. 48, 356.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, I. & Jackson, M.L. (1960) Clays and Clay Minerals. Proc. 7th Conf., p. 102. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hill, W. (1915) Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 35, 263.Google Scholar
Hume, W.F. (1893) Chemical and Micromineralogical Researches on the Upper Cretaceous Zones of the South of England. London.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.L. (1956) Soil Chemical Analysis—Advanced Course, p. 544. Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Kiely, P.V. & Jackson, M.L. (1964) Am. Miner. 49, 1648.Google Scholar
Lacroix, A. (1897) Mineralogie de la France et de ses Colonies, 2, p. 614. Paris.Google Scholar
Perrin, R.M.S. (1956) Nature, Lond. 178, 31.Google Scholar
Perrin, R.M.S. (1957) Clay Miner. Bull. 3, 193.Google Scholar
Perrin, R.M.S. (1964) Analysis of Calcareous Materials, p. 208. Chemy Ind. Monograph Series, London.Google Scholar
Robertson, R.H.S. (1961) Clay Miner. Bull. 4, 282.Google Scholar
Sato, M. (1962) Mineralog. J., Sapporo, 3, 296.Google Scholar
Shaw, K. (1959) J. Soil Sci. 10, 316.Google Scholar
Warren, B.E. & Biscoe, J. (1938) J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 21, 49.Google Scholar
Weir, A.H. (1965) Clay Miner. 6, 17.Google Scholar
Winchell, A.N. (1951) Elements of Optical Mineralogy, 4th edn, p. 251. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Young, B.R. (1965) Bull. geol. Surv. Gt Br. 23, 110.Google Scholar