Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T20:55:49.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hydration states of an expanded phlogopite in relation to interlayer cations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

T. D. Thompson ,
Sally A. Wentworth  and
G. W. Brindley
T. D. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Geochemistry and Mineralogy, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa.
Sally A. Wentworth
Affiliation:
Department of Geochemistry and Mineralogy, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa.
G. W. Brindley
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 2–20 µ fraction of phlogopite has been converted to the sodium form by use of sodium tetraphenylboron-NaCl solutions. The cation exchange capacity of the treated material increases to a maximum of about 212 m-eq/100 g, which agrees well with the K2O + Na2O content of the initial mineral. Li-, Na-, Ca-, and Mg-saturated forms have been prepared and examined by X-ray diffraction and by thernogravimetric measurements in air, in vacuo, and at progressively elevated temperatures. Hydration states corresponding to double water layers are observed for the Mg- and Ca- forms, and to single water layers for the Mg-, Ca-, Na-, and Li- forms. The numbers of water molecules per unit cell and per interlayer cation are considered for the various hydration states.

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , July 1967 , pp. 43 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barshad, I. (1950) Am. Mine. 35, 225.Google Scholar
Barshad, I. (1952) Proc. Soil. Sci. Soc. A. 16, 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, W.F. & Serratosa, J.M. (1960) Clays Clay Mine. 7, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, W. F., Weiss, E. J. & Rowland, R. A. (1963) Clays Clay Mine. 10, 117.Google Scholar
Foster, M. D. (1960) U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Pape.354-B, 11.Google Scholar
Mathieson, A.MCL. & Walker, G. F. (1954) Am. Mine. 39, 231.Google Scholar
Rich, C.I. (1961) Soil Sc. 92, 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, M. & Pedro, G. (1965) C.r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 261, 4147.Google Scholar
Robert, M. & Pedro, G. (1966) Bull. Grpe fr. Argile.17, 3.Google Scholar
Scott, A.D., Hunziker, R.R. & Hanway, J.J. (1960) Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. A. 24, 191.Google Scholar
Scott, A. D. & Reed, M. G. (1962a) Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. A. 26, 41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, A.D. & Reed, M. G. (1962b) Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. A. 26, 45 Google Scholar
Scott, A.D. & Smith, S.J. (1966) Clays Clay Mine. 14, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirozu, H. & Bailey, S.W. (1966) Am. Mine. 51, 1124.Google Scholar
van Olphen, H. (1965) J. Colloid Sc. 20, 822.Google Scholar
Walker, G. F. (1956) Clays Clay Mine. 4, 101.Google Scholar
Walker, G. F. (1961) X-ray Identification and Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals, 2nd edn. (Brown, G., ed.), Chap. 7, pp. 297–324.Google Scholar
White, J. L. (1950) Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. A. 15, 129.Google Scholar