Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:53:36.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Location of Bound Cobalt on 2:1 Layer Silicates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

J. F. Hodgson
Affiliation:
United States Plant, Soil and Nutrition Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S.D.A., and the Department of Agronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Kevin G. Tiller*
Affiliation:
United States Plant, Soil and Nutrition Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S.D.A., and the Department of Agronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
*
1Present address: Division of Soils, C.S.I.R.O., Adelaide, South Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Three techniques have been used to determine what clay mineral surfaces are involved in the selective bonding of Co: (a) polyphosphate ions were used to block edge surfaces of montmorillonite and vermiculite from Co, (b) collapse of the interlamellar spaces with potassium saturation was used to block internal basal surfaces of vermiculite from Co, and (c) autoradiographs were prepared of vermiculite and mica particles that had reacted with Co58. In each case Co in low concentration was allowed to combine with the mineral in the presence of high concentrations of CaCl2.

The preliminary sorption of polyphosphate ions had no appreciable effect on the sorption of Co by the minerals studied, indicating that the edge surfaces were not likely to be involved in the Co reaction. The blocking of internal basal areas had only a very slight effect suggesting that these surfaces were involved in the sorption of Co, but only to a limited extent. Autoradiographs of naturally occurring vermiculite particles revealed a somewhat uneven distribution of Co over the planar surface of the particles. Removal of the outer layers of the crystals, either before or after the material had combined with Co but before autoradiography, resulted in a concentration of the metal along edges and cracks.

Apparently the external basal surfaces are principally involved in the specific sorption of Co by layer silicates. It is suggested that chemical weathering and physical abrasion of the surfaces introduce defect structures which favor the chemical bonding of heavy metals.

Type
General Session
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 1960

References

Bower, C. A. and Truog, E. (1940) Base exchange capacity determination as influenced by nature of cation employed and formation of basic exchange salts: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., y. 5, pp. 8694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, G. A. (1955) Autoradiography in Biology and Medicine: Academic Press, Inc., New York, 399 pp.Google Scholar
DeMumbrum, L. E. and Jackson, J. L. (1956) Infrared absorption evidence on exchange reaction mechanism of copper and zinc with layer silicate clays and peat: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 20, pp. 334337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgabaly, M. M. and Jenny, H. (1943) Cation and anion interchange with zinc montmorillonite clays: J. Phys. Chem., v. 47, pp. 399408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. F. (1960) Cobalt reactions with montmorillonite: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 24, pp. 165168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzel, R. G. and Jackson, M. L. (1951) Mechanism of sorption of hydroxy cupric ion by clays: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 15, pp. 122124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelc, S. R. (1947) Autoradiograph technique: Nature, v. 160, pp. 749750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencer, W. F. and Gieseking, J. E. (1954) Cobalt adsorption and release in cation-exchange systems: Soil Sci., y. 78, pp. 267276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiller, Kevin G. (1961) Specific sorption of some heavy metal cations by pure minerals and soil clays: Ph. D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y.Google Scholar