Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T02:37:19.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Statistical Distribution Patterns of Particle Size and Shape in the Georgia Kaolins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Robert F. Conley*
Affiliation:
Georgia Kaolin Research Laboratories, Elizabeth, New Jersey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

High resolution electron micrographic techniques have been employed for surveying the size and shape distributions of kaolinite particles, both plates and stacks, from well-crystallized Georgia deposits.

Both size and shape follow typical, positively-skewed, frequency distributions. Particle thicknesses among plates appear quantized, dominantly as hoxalaminae and subordinately as trilaminae of the basic c-axis dimension in the unit cell. Specimens subjected to severe shear and attrition show intermediate values of thickness, i.e. 3n + 1 and 3n + 2. Profile studies on kaolinite stacks reval integral platelet units whose distribution in thickness corresponds to that of individual plates.

Energy calculations for fracture (cleavage ‖ to c-axis) and delamination (cleavage ⊥c-axis) processes indicate that hydrokinetic cleavage in nature should result in particles having an aspect ratio distribution peaking near 6: 1. The dominance of stacks above 10 μ is suggestive of in situ weathering. Experimental shear measurements correlate well with these proposals.

Sedimentation studies with clays of various shapes and distributions were performed in a variety of aqueous media, including sea water. Sediment volume data, microscopic observations, and theoretical packing calculations are compared with the several mechanisms proposed for plate-stack genesis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 1966

References

Auty, R. P. and Cole, R. H. (1952) Dielectric properties of ice and solid D2O: Jour. Chem. Phys. 20, 1309–14.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. W. and Nakahira, M. (1958) Further consideration of the crystal structure of kaolinite: Min. Mag. 31, 781–6.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. W. and Robinson, K. (1946a) The structure of kaolinite: Min. Mag. 27, 242–53.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. W. and Robinson, K. (1946b) Randomness in the structures of kaolinitic clay minerals: Trans. Faraday Soc. 42B, 198205.10.1039/tf946420b198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conley, R. F. (1963) Rapid particle-size analysis of ceramic clays by packing-volume technique: Jour. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 46, 15.Google Scholar
Hinckley, D. N. (1961) Mineralogical and chemical variations in the kaolin deposits of the coastal plain of Georgia and South Carolina: Tech. Rep. (NSF G-3735), Coll. of Min. Ind., Penn. St. Univ., University Park, Penn.Google Scholar
Jonas, E. C. (1964) Petrology of the Dry Branch, Georgia, Kaolin Deposits: Clays and Clay Minerals, Proc. 12th Conf., Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 199205.Google Scholar
Keeling, P. S. (1963) Infrared absorption characteristics of clay minerals: Trans. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 62, 549–63.Google Scholar
Moore, L. R. (1964) The in situ formation and development of some kaolinite macro- crystals: Clay Min. Bull. 5, 338–51.10.1180/claymin.1964.005.31.02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauling, L. (1935) The structure and entropy of ice and of other crystals with same randomness of structure and atomic arrangements: Jour. Amer. Chem. Soc. 57, 9497.10.1021/ja01315a102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimental, G. S. and McClellan, A. L. (1960) The Hydrogen Bond: W. H. Freeman, San Francisco , p. 206–25 (Lewis, G. N., and Randall, M., cooperating authors).Google Scholar
Ross, C. S. and Kerr, P. F. (1930) The kaolin minerals: U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 165-E, pp. 151–75.Google Scholar
Rossini, F. D. (1952) Selected values of chemical thermodynamic properties: N.B.S. Circular 500 (see also U.S. Bureau of Mines (1954) Tech. Rep. 542 and U.S. Atomic Energy Report ANL-5750).Google Scholar
Rowlinson, J. S. (1951) The lattice energy of ice and the second virial coefficient of water vapor: Trans. Faraday Soc. 47, 120–9.10.1039/tf9514700120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, E. F., Wilde, R. H. and Albertson, M. L. (1954) Influence of shape on the fall velocity of sedimentary particles: Sedimentation Series Report No. 5, Missouri River Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha, Nebr.Google Scholar
Woodward, L. W. and Lyons, S. C. (1951) Mechanism of gloss development in clay-coated sheets: Tappi 34, 438–42.Google Scholar