Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:21:12.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implementing Evidence-Based Psychosocial Practices: Lessons Learned from Statewide Implementation of Two Practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Lorna L. Moser ,
Natalie L. DeLuca ,
Gary R. Bond  and
Angela L. Rollins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective: As part of this national project, we examined barriers and strategies to implementation of two evidence-based practices (EBPs) in Indiana.

Background: Despite many advances in the knowledge base regarding mental health treatment, the implementation of EBPs in real-world setting remains poorly understood. The National EBP Project is a multi-state study of factors influencing implementation of EBPs.

Methods: Over a 15-month period we observed eight assertive community treatment (ACT) programs and six integrated dual disorders treatment (IDDT) programs and noted pertinent actions taken by the state mental health agency influencing implementation. We created a database containing summaries of monthly visits to each program and interviews with key leaders. Using this database and clinical impressions, we rated barriers and strategies at each site on seven factors: Attitudes, Mastery, Leadership, Staffing, Policies, Workflow, and Program Monitoring.

Results: At the site level, the most frequently observed barriers were in the areas of leadership, staffing and policies for ACT, and mastery and leadership for IDDT. Overall, barriers were more evident for IDDT than for ACT. Strategies were less frequently noted but generally paralleled the areas noted for barriers. However, our central finding was that ACT was generally more successfully implemented than IDDT throughout the state, and that this difference could be traced in large part to state-level factors relating to historical preparation for the practice, establishment of standards, formation of a technical assistance center, and funding.

Conclusion: In this case study, both state-level and site-specific factors influenced success of implementation of EBPs. To address these factors, the field needs systematic strategies to anticipate and overcome these barriers if full implementation is to be realized.

Type
Original Research
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 9 , Issue 12 , December 2004 , pp. 926 - 936,942
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Lehman, AFSteinwachs, DM. Patterns of usual care for schizophrenia: initial results from the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Client Survey. Schizophr Bull. 1998;24(1):11–20.Google Scholar
2.Hall, LL, Graf, AC, Fitzpatrick, MJ, Lane, T, Birkel, RC. Shattered lives: results of a national survey of NAMI memhers living with mental illness and their families. Arlington, VA: NAMI/TRIAD (Treatment/Recovery Information and Advocacy Data Base); 2003.Google Scholar
3.New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America. Final Report. Rockville, MD: Suhstance Ahuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2003. DHHS Puh. No. SMA-03-3832.Google Scholar
4.Surgeon General. Surgeon General's Report on Mental Health. Washington, DC; US Government Printing Office; 2000.Google Scholar
5.Turner, JC, TenHoor, WJ. The NIMH community support program: pilot approach to a needed social reform. Schizophr Bull. 1978;4:319–348.Google Scholar
6.Bond, GR, Variations in an assertive outreach model. New Dir Mem Health Serv. 1991;52:65–80.Google Scholar
7.Rosenheck, R, Neale, M, Leaf, P, Milstein, R, Frisman, L. Multisite experimental cost study of intensive psychiatric community care. Schizophr Bull. 1995;21:129–140.Google Scholar
8.Backer, TE, Liberman, RP, Kuehnel, TG. Dissemination and adoption of innovative psychosocial interventions. J Consult Ciin Psychol. 1986;54:111–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Noble, JH. The Benefits and Costs of Supported Employment for People with Mental Illness and with Traumatic Brain Injury in New York State. Buffalo, NY: Research Foundation of the State University of New York; 1991. C-0023180.Google Scholar
10.Corrigan, PW, McCracken, SG. Interactive Staff Training: Rehabilitatum Teams That Work. New York, NY: Plenum; 1997.Google Scholar
11.Hoge, MA, Tondora, J, Stuart, GW. Training in evidence-based practice. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2003;26:851–865.Google Scholar
12.McFarlane, WR, McNary, S, Dixon, L, Hornby, H, Cimett, E. Predictors of dissemination of family psychoeducation in community mental health centers in Maine and Illinois. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:935–942.Google Scholar
13.Klein, KJ, Sorra, S. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manage Rev. 1996;21:1055–1080.Google Scholar
14.Simpson, DD. A conceptual framework for transferring research into practice. J Suhst Abuse Treat. 2002;22:171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lehman, AF, Kreyenbuhl, J, Buchanan, RW, et al.The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT): Updated treatment recommendations 2003. Schizophr Bull. 2004;30:193–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Lehman, AF, Steinwachs, DM. Translating research into practice: the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) treatment recommendation. Schizophr Bull. 1998;24:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Drake, RE, Mueser, KT, Torrey, WC, et al.Evidence-based treatment of schizophrenia. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2000;2:393–397.Google Scholar
18.Mueser, KT, Torrey, WC, Lynde, D, Singer, P, Drake, RE. Implementing evidence-based practices for people with severe mental illness. Behav Modif. 2003;27:387–411.Google Scholar
19.Torrey, WC, Drake, RE, Dixon, L, et al.Implementing evidence-based practices for persons with severe mental illnesses. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:45–50.Google Scholar
20.Brunette, M, Drake, RE, Lynde, DW, eds. Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment Implementation Resource Kit. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2002.Google Scholar
21.Phillips, SD, Burns, BJ, eds. Assertive Community Treatment Implementation Resource Kit Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2002.Google Scholar
22.Torrey, WC, Finnerty, M, Evans, A, Wyzik, PF. Strategies for leading the implementation of evidence-based practices. Psycgiatr Clin North Am. 2003;26:883–897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.McDonel, EC, Bond, GR, Salyers, M, et al.Implementing assertive community treatment programs in rural settings. Adm Policy Ment Health. 1997;25:153–173.Google Scholar
24.Talbott, JA. Unified mental health systems: Utopia unrealized. New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1983;18(themeissue):1–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Bond, GR, Evans, L, Salyers, MP, Williams, J, Kim, HK. Measurement of fidelity in psychiatric rehabilitation. Ment Health Serv Res. 2000;2:75–87.Google Scholar
26.Bond, GR, Drake, RE, Mueser, KT, Latimer, E. Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental illness: critical ingredients and impact on patients. Disease Management & Health Outcomes. 2001;9:141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Phillips, SD, Burns, BJ, Edgar, ER, et al.Moving assertive community treatment into standard practice. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:771–779.Google Scholar
28.Drake, RE, Essock, SM, Shaner, A, et al.Implementing dual diagnosis services for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:469–476.Google Scholar
29.Mueser, KT, Noordsy, DL, Drake, RE, Fox, L. Integrated treatment for dual disorders: a guide to effective practice. New York, NY: Guilford Publications; 2003.Google Scholar
30.Miles, MB, Huberman, AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Source Book of New Methods. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1984.Google Scholar
31.Teague, GB, Bond, GR, Drake, RE. Program fidelity in assertive community treatment: development and use of a measure. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1998;68:216–232.Google Scholar
32.Torrey, WC, McHugo, GJ. Barriers and Strategies to Implementing EBPs. Lebanon, NH: New Hampshire Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center; 2002.Google Scholar
33.McGrew, JH, Bond, GR. The association between program characteristics and service delivery in assertive community treatment. Adm Policy Ment Health. 1997;25:175–189.Google Scholar
34.Bond, GR, Miller, LD, Krumwied, RD, Ward, RS. Assertive case management in three CMHCs: a controlled study. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1988;39:411–418.Google Scholar
35.Bond, GR, McDonel, EC, Miller, LD, Pensec, M. Assertive community treatment and reference groups: an evaluation of their effectiveness for young adults with serious mental illness and substance abuse problems. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1991;15:31–43.Google Scholar
36.McGrew, JH, Bond, GR, Dietzen, LL, McKasson, M, Miller, LD. A multi-site study of client outcomes in assertive community treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 1995;46:696–701.Google Scholar
37.Fekete, DM, Bond, GR, McDonel, EC, Salyers, MP, Chen, A, Miller, LD. Rural assertive community treatment: Afield experiment. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1998;21:371–379.Google Scholar
38.Allness, DJ, Knoedler, WH. The PACT Model of Community-based Treatment for Persons with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness: A Manual for PACT Start-up. Arlington, VA: NAMI; 1998.Google Scholar
39.Indiana Health Coverage Programs. Provider Bulletin BT200413. Available at: http://www.indianamedicaid.com/ihcp/Publications/bulletin_results.asp. Indianapolis: EDS; Accessed June 18 2004.Google Scholar
40.IFSSA Division of Mental Health and Addiction. Assertive Community Treatment Services. Availabie at: http://psych.iupui.edu/ACTCenter/Standards.pdf. Accessed November 15, 2004.Google Scholar
41.Backer, T, Liberman, R, Kuehnel, T. The failure of success: challenges of disseminating effective substance abuse programs. J Comm Psychology. 2000;28:363–373.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Becker, DR, Torrey, WC, Toscano, R, Wyzik, PF, Fox, TS. Building recovery-oriented services: Lessons from implementing individual placement and support (IPS) in community mental health centers. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1998:22:51–54.Google Scholar