Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T19:55:53.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Shanties to Lace Curtains: The Irish Image in Puck, 1876–1910

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

John J. Appel
Affiliation:
Michigan State University

Extract

Students of drama, magazine fiction and novels know that virtually every nationality and minority group has been represented by a stereotype in print and on the stage. Social scientists generally discuss stereotypes as components of prejudiced beliefs accompanied by strong, unexamined reactions of dislike or approval. Historians and specialists in literature do not equate stereotyping with prejudice. Instead, they emphasize the origin of stereotypes as routinized, crude or at least oversimplified classifications of multifaceted characters and situations.

Type
Perception of Ethnic and Cultural Differences
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mott, Frank L., A History of American Magazines (Cambridge, Mass., 1938), III, Supplement, ‘Puck’ and ‘Judge’.Google Scholar

2 Hill, L. Draper, ‘What Fools These Mortals Be’. A Study of the Work of Joseph Keppler, Founder of Puck, Harvard Honors History Thesis, Cambridge, 1957. Mr. Hill corrected a number of errors in the draft version of this essay, allowed me to read and quote from his unpublished History Honors Thesis, and lent materials from his collection. I am pleased to be able to thank him here for his repeated courtesies.Google Scholar

3 Puck, May 11, 1887.Google Scholar

4 Brown, Thomas N., Irish-American Nationalism (Philadelphia, 1966), p. 46.Google Scholar

5 Curtis, L. P. Jr., Anglo-Saxon and Cells (New York, 1968).Google Scholar

6 Allport, Gordon W., The Nature of Prejudice (Garden City, New York, 1958), p. 192.Google Scholar

7 Puck, October 26, 1881.Google Scholar

8 Puck, , March 16, 1904.Google Scholar

9 Puck, February 28, 1912; September 6, 1905; December 4, 1907.Google Scholar

10 Lippman, Walter, ‘Stereotypes’, in Bernard Berelson and Morris Janowitz, Reader in Public Opinion and Communication (New York, 1966), pp. 6572.Google Scholar

11 Curtis, , op. cit., p. 52.Google Scholar

12 Keller, Morton, The Art and Politics of Thomas Nast (New York, 1968).Google Scholar

13 Brown, , Irish-American Nationalism, p. 45.Google ScholarShannon, William V., The American Irish (New York, 1963), passim.Google Scholar

14 Handlin, Oscar, Race and Nationality in American Life (Garden City, N.Y., 1957), p. 72.Google Scholar

15 Gossett, Thomas F., Race, the History of an Idea in America (New York, 1965), p. 292.Google Scholar

16 Solomon, Barbara Miller, Ancestors and Immigrants (Cambridge, Mass., 1957), chapter VIII, ‘The Testing of Races: Stereotypes of the Foreign-Born,’ pp. 152–75.Google Scholar

17 Other books consulted include Frederic, Harold, The Damnation of Theron Ware (Cambridge, Mass., 1960)Google Scholar; George, Dorothy M., English Political Caricature: 1793–1832 (Oxford, 1959)Google Scholar; Hill, L. Draper, Mr. Gillray, the Caricaturist (London, 1965)Google Scholar; Bunner, H. C., editor, A Selection of Cartoons from Puck by Joseph Keppler (New York, 1893)Google Scholar; Murrell, William, A History of American Graphic Humor (New York, 1933)Google Scholar; Beer, Thomas, The Mauve Decade (New York, 1961)Google Scholar, Chapter 4, ‘Dear Harp’; Stephen Hess and Milton Kaplan, The Ungentlemanly Art (New York, 1968)Google Scholar; George, Mary D., Catalogue of Political and Personal Satires preserved in the … British Museum (London, 1935)Google Scholar; Gombrich, E. H., Art and Illusion (New York, 1961)Google Scholar; Curtis, L. Perry Jr., Apes and Angels, The Irishman in Victorian Caricature (Washington, D.C.: 1971). Travel, research and photoduplication expenses for this study were supported by a Michigan State University faculty research grant and a visiting scholar appointment at the Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. in 1969–70.Google Scholar