Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:43:36.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes towards an Anthropology of Political Revolutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2012

Bjørn Thomassen*
Affiliation:
Society and Globalization, Roskilde University

Abstract

While resistance and rebellion have remained core themes in anthropology at least since the 1960s, anthropologists have paid much less attention to the study of political revolutions as real historical events. Yet there are compelling real-world reasons why they should orient their analytical apparatus and ethnographic efforts towards revolutionary events. This article advances a series of reasons why anthropology can enrich and supplement existing political science and history traditions in the study of political revolutions. Anthropology can do so via key concepts developed by Victor Turner: “liminality,” “social drama,” “communitas,” “frame,” and “play.” Turner's ritual approach gains further relevance when linked to another series of concepts developed by Marcel Mauss, Gabriel Tarde, Georg Simmel, and Gregory Bateson, such as “imitation,” “trickster,” “schismogenesis,” and “crowd behavior.” To study revolutions implies not only a focus on political behavior “from below,” but also recognition of moments where “high and low” are relativized or subverted, and where the micro- and macro-levels fuse in critical conjunctions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bateson, Gregory. 1958. Naven. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1991. Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1994. A Revolution in the Theory of Revolutions? International Political Science Review, 15, 1: 1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borch, Christian. 2010. Between Destructiveness and Vitalism: Simmel's Sociology of Crowds. Conserveries mémorielles http://cm.revues.org/744 (accessed 6 Apr. 2011).Google Scholar
Canetti, Elias. 1984. Crowds and Power. Stewart, C., trans. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Comaroff, Jean and Comaroff, John L.. 1991. Of Revelation and Revolution I: Christianity, Colonialism and Consciousness in South Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, Jean and Comaroff, John L.. 1997. Of Revelation and Revolution II: The Dialectics of Modernity on a South African Frontier. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degregori, Carlos I. 1988. Sendero Luminoso: lucha armada y utopía autoritaria. IEP Ediciones (documento di trabajo no. 6).Google Scholar
Donham, Donald D. 1999. Marxist Modern: An Ethnographic History of the Ethiopian Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. 1989. Modern Revolutions: An Introduction to the Study of a Political Phenomenon. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmul N. 1978. Revolutions and the Transformations of Society: A Comparative Study of Civilizations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmul N. 1995. The Order-Maintaining and Order-Transforming Dimensions of Culture. In Power, Trust, and Meaning: Essays in Sociological Theory and Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward E., ed. 1967. The Zande Trickster. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Foran, John, ed. 1997. Theorizing Revolution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Fournier, Marcel. 2005. Marcel Mauss: A Biography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gane, Mike. 1992. The Radical Sociology of Durkheim and Mauss. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gennep, Arnold van. 1960 [1909]. The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Girard, René. 1979. Violence and the Sacred. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gledhill, John. 1985. The Peasantry in History: Some Notes on Latin America Research. Critique of Anthropology 5, 1: 3356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluckman, Max. 1963. Order and Rebellion in Tribal Africa. London: Cohen and West.Google Scholar
Hale, Charles W. 1994. Resistance and Contradiction: Miskitu Indians and the Nicaraguan State, 1894–1987. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Richard. 2005. Critics against Culture: Anthropological Observers of Mass Society. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Horvath, Agnese. 1998. Tricking into the Position of the Outcast: A Case Study in the Emergence and Effects of Communist Power. Political Psychology 19, 2: 331–47.Google Scholar
Agnese, Horvath and Szakolczai, A.. 1992. The Dissolution of Communist Power: The Case of Hungary. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Agnese, Horvath and Thomassen, B.. 2008. Mimetic Errors in Liminal Schismogenesis: On the Political Anthropology of the Trickster. International Political Anthropology 1, 1: 324.Google Scholar
Hyde, Lewis. 1998. Trickster Makes this World. New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2003. Semiotics and the Social Analysis of Material Things.” Language and Communication 23, 3–4: 409–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsbaek, Leif. 2005. El estudio antropologico del conflicto en la antropologìa mexicana. El caso de San Francisco Oxtotilpan. Una comunidad indìgena en el estado de México. Perspectivas Latinoamericanas 2: 2846.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2002. Gabriel Tarde and the End of the Social. In Joyce, Patrick, ed., The Social in Question: New Bearings in History and the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Le Bon, Gustave. 2006. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. Filiquarian Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
Llobera, Josep. 1989. Catalan National Identity: The Dialectics of Past and Present. In Tonkin, Elizabeth et al. , eds., History and Ethnicity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manning, Paul. 2007. Rose-Colored Glasses? Color Revolutions and Cartoon Chaos in Postsocialist Georgia. Cultural Anthropology 22, 2: 171213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1992 [1924–1925]. A Sociological Assessment of the Bolshevism. In Gane, M., ed., The Radical Sociology of Durkheim and Mauss. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nairn, Tom. 1977. The Break-Up of Britain: Crisis and Neo-Nationalism. Thetford, Norfolk: Lowe and Brydone Printers.Google Scholar
Nugent, Daniel. 1993. Spent Cartridges of Revolution: An Anthropological History of Namiquipa, Chihuahua. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry. 1995. Resistance and the Problem of Ethnographic Refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History 37, 1: 173–93.Google Scholar
Radin, Paul. 1972. The Trickster: A Study in American Indian Mythology (with commentary by Karl Kerényi and Carl G. Jung). New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1976. The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Subsistence and Rebellion in Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sewell, William. 2005. Logics of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, Susan. 2006. Resistance. Anthropological Theory 6, 3: 303–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Straus, Scott. 2001. Organic Purity and the Role of Anthropology in Cambodia and Rwanda. Patterns of Prejudice 35, 2: 4762.Google Scholar
Szakolczai, Arpad. 2000. Reflexive Historical Sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Szakolczai, Arpad. 2004. Experiential Sociology. Theoria 103: 5987.Google Scholar
Szakolczai, Arpad. 2009. Liminality and Experience: Structuring Transitory Situations and Transformative Events. International Political Anthropology 2, 1: 141–72.Google Scholar
Szakolczai, Arpad and Thomassen, Bjørn. 2011. Gabriel Tarde as Political Anthropologist. International Political Anthropology 4, 1: 5068.Google Scholar
Tarde, Gabriel. 1962 [1890]. The Laws of Imitation. Gloucester: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Bjørn. 2008. What Kind of Political Anthropology? International Political Anthropology 1, 2: 263–74.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Bjørn. 2009. The Uses and Meanings of Liminality. International Political Anthropology 2, 1: 528.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Bjørn. 2010. Anthropology, Multiple Modernities, and the Axial Age Debate. Anthropological Theory 10, 4: 321–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomassen, Bjørn. 2012. Anthropology and Its Many Modernities: When Concepts Matter. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18: 160–78.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor W. 1957. Schism and Continuity in African Society: A Study of Ndembu Village Life. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor W. 1967. Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period. In Rites de Passage: The Forest of Symbols. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor W. 1969. The Ritual Process, Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor W. 1979. Frame, Flow and Reflection: Ritual and Drama as Public Liminality. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 6, 4: 465–99.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor W. 1982. From Ritual to Theatre. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor W. 1985. On the Edge of the Bush. Turner, E., ed. Arizona: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor W. 1988. The Anthropology of Performance. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar
Worsley, Peter. 1961. The Analysis of Rebellion and Revolution in Modern British Social Anthropology. Science & Society 25, 1: 2637.Google Scholar
Wydra, Harald. 2009. The Liminal Origins of Democracy. International Political Anthropology 2, 1: 91109.Google Scholar