Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T10:06:25.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Paths of Agrarian Capitalism, or a Critique of Chayanovian Marxism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

David Lehmann
David Lehmann
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the ideology of “dependency” and the “world system” the preservation of a comprador bourgeoisie highly dependent on its control of the state apparatus perpetuates the condition of underdevelopment to the benefit not only of that class but also of the world capitalist system, and obviously to the detriment of the remainder of the population of poor countries (Wallerstein 1984). According to these theories, the condition of dependency is sustained also by the perpetuation of petty-commodity production and other precapitalist relationships. In his enumeration of the implications of accumulation in “socially and sectorally disarticulated economies” (that is, third world countries), Alain de Janvry, who places himself, with some reservations, in the world-system school, states that “subsistence agriculture becomes the ultimate embodiment of the contradictions of accumulation in the disarticulated economies; … the peasant household constitutes an articulated-dominated purveyor of cheap labour and cheap food [even though] subsistence agriculture slowly disintegrates under this domination as it performs its essential structural function under disarticulated accumulation” (1981:39). For Immanuel Wallerstein, the state-class relationship and the persistence of pettycommodity production are both features of the “peripheral condition” and explain why it is so difficult (though not absolutely impossible) in his schema for countries to graduate from his periphery and semiperiphery to the core of advanced economies. The argument runs as follows: in its expansion across the globe the capitalist world economy creates social structures and state structures that fit the needs of the core economies by establishing a ruling class in control of the state and holding monopoly power within the national economy.

Type
Capitalist Transformations of Agriculture
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , October 1986 , pp. 601 - 627
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alberti, G., AND Meyer, E. 1974. Reciprocidad e intercambio en los Andes peruanos. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Amin, Samir. 1976. Unequal Exchange. Hassocks, England: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Archetti, Eduardo, AND Stolen, K-A. 1975. Explotación familiar y acumulación de capital en el campo argentino. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Arizpe, Lourdes. 1981. “Migración por relevos,” in Economíc campesina y empleo, PREALC, ed., 119–44. Santiago: PREALC.Google Scholar
Barsky, Osvaldo, AND Cosse, Gustavo. 1981. Tecnología y cambio social: Las haciendas lecheras del Ecuador. Quito: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Henry. 1979. “Concepts for the Analysis of Contemporary Peasantries.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 6:4, 421–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, D. 1984. “Marxism and Development Sociology: Interpreting the Impasse.” World Development, 13:7 (July).Google Scholar
Brass, Tom. 1983. “Agrarian Reform and the Struggle for Labour Power: A Peruvian Case Study.” Journal of Development Studies, 19:3 (April), 368–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewster, John. 1950. “Machine Process in Agriculture and Industry.” Journal of Farm Economics, 32:162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgos, H. 1977. Relaciones interétnicoaso en Ríobamba. Mexico City: Instituto Indigenista Interamericano.Google Scholar
Carrera, Nicolás Iñigo. 1981. “El ‘estado’ en un proceso de creación de condiciones para la constitución de un sistema productivo rural,” in Economía ampesina y empleo, PREALC, ed. Santiago: PREALC.Google Scholar
Celestino, Olinda. 1972. Migración y cambio estructural: La comunidad de Lampián. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Chayanov, A. V. 1967. The Theory of Peasant Economy, D., Thorner, B. Kerblay, and Smith, R. E. F., eds. Homewood, III..: Irwin and Co.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne. 1978. “Mexican Migration to the United States: Causes, Consequences, and U.S. Responses.” Manuscript. Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Cotlear, Daniel. 1984. “Desigualdad, derechos de propiedad y migración ert las comunidades andinas.” Revista Andina, no.4, 435–75.Google Scholar
Crispi, Jaime. 1984. “Nacimiento, vida pasión y…? de un tipo de propiedad familiar en Chile: Los parceleros de la Reforma Agraria.” Paper presented to the conference on “Medium Farmers in Latin America,”Centre for Latin American Studies,Cambridge.Google Scholar
Figueroa, Adolfo. 1982. “Production and Market Exchange in Peasant Economies,” in Ecology and Exchange in the Andes, D. Lehmann, ed., 123–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fioravanti-Molinié, Antoinette. 1982. “Multi-levelled Andean Society and Market Exchange: The Case of Yucay,” in Ecology and Exchange in the Andes, D. Lehmann, ed., 211–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folbre, Nancy. 1985. “Cleaning House: New Perspectives on Households and Eco nomic Development.” Paper presented to the conference on “New Directions in Development Theory,”Massachusetts Institute of Technology, January.Google Scholar
Fonseca, Martel Cesar. 1974. “Modalidades de la mink'a,” in Reciprocidad e intercambio en los Andes peruanos, G. Alberti and Mayer, E., eds. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Friedmann, Harriet. 1980. “Household Production and the National Economy: Concepts for the Analysis of Agrarian Formations.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 7:2, 158–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuenzalida, Fernando, et al. 1968. Estructuras tradicionales y economía de mercado: La comunidad indígena de Huayopampa. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Goodman, David, AND Redclift, Michael. 1981. From Peasant to Proletarian. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grondin, Marcelo. 1978. “Peasant Cooperation and Dependency: The Case of the Electricity Enterprises of Muquiyauyo,” in Peasant Cooperation and Capitalist Expansion in Central Peru, N. Long and Roberts, B., eds., 99–128. Austin: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of Texas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Janvry, Alain. 1981. The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Cristobal. 1982. “Achievements and Contradictions of the Peruvian Agrarian Reform.” Journal of Development Studies, 18:2 (January), 141–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, David. 1974. “Agrarian Reform in Chile: An Essay in Contradictions,” in Agrarian Reform and Agrarian Reformism, David, Lehmann, ed., 71–120. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Lehmann, David. 1982a. “After Lenin and Chayanov.” Journal of Development Economics, no.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, David. 1982b. “Peasantisation and Proletarianisation in Brazil and Mexico,” in Rural Poverty and Agrarian Reform, Jones, Steve et al. , eds. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
Lehmann, David. 1986 forthcoming. “Sharecropping and the Capitalist Transition in Agri culture: Some Evidence from Highland Ecuador.” Journal of Development Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenin, V. I. 1946 [1914–1915]. “Capitalism and Agriculture in the United States,” in his Capitalism and Agriculture, 9–56. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Lipton, Michael. 1974. “Towards a Theory of Land Reform,” in Agrarian Reform and Agrarian Reformism, David, Lehmann, ed., 269–315. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Lipton, Michael 1977. Why Poor People Stay Poor: Urban Bias in World Development. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Long, Norman, and Roberts, Bryan, eds. 1978. Peasant Cooperation and Capitalist Expansion in Central Peru. Austin: Institute for Latin American Studies, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Long, Norman. 1984. Miners, Peasants, and Entrepreneurs: Regional Development in the Central Highlands of Peru. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallon, Florencia. 1983. The Defense of Community in Peru's Central Highlands: Peasant Struggle and Capitalist Transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1976 [1867]. Capital, Vol.I. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Murra, John. 1975. Formaciones económicas y politicas del mundo andino. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Patnaik, Utsa. 1983. “Classical Theory of Rent and Its Application to India.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 10:2,3 (special issue on sharecropping and sharecroppers), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Samuel. 1981. The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Salamea, Lucia. 1980. “La transformación de la hacienda y los cambios en la condición campesina,” in Ecuador: Cambios en el agro serrano, FLAGSO/CEPLAES, eds. Quito: FLACSO-CEPLAES.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Rodrigo. 1982. “The Andean Economic System and Capitalism,” in Ecology and Exchange in the Andes, D. Lehmann, ed., 157–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Albornoz, Nicolás. 1978. Indios y tributos del alto Peru. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Schultz, Theodore. 1964. Transforming Traditional Agriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1976. The Moral Economy of the Peasant. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sempat, Assadourian Carlos. 1982. El sistema de la economia colonial. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Sen, Abhijit. 1981. “Market Failure and Control of Labour Power: Towards an Explanation of ‘Structure’ and Change in Indian Agriculture.” Cambridge Journal of Economics (September), 201–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1966. “Peasants and Dualism with or without Surplus Labour.” Journal of Political Economy, 74:425–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reprinted in his Resources, Values, and Development (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985).Google Scholar
Shanin, T. 1973–74. “The Nature and Logic of Peasant Economy.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 1:1, 63–80. and 1:2, 186–206.Google Scholar
da Silva, Graziano. 1981. Progreso técnico e relações de trabalho na agricultura. Sao Paulo: HUCITEC.Google Scholar
Smith, G. A. 1984. “Confederations of Households: Extended Domestic Enterprises in City and Country,” in Miners, Peasants, and Entrepreneurs: Regional Development in the Central Highlands of Peru Long, N. and Roberts, B., eds., 217–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Sheila. 1980. “The Ideas of Samir Amin: Theory or Tautology?” Journal of Development Studies, 17:1 (October), 5–21.Google Scholar
Spalding, Karen. 1973. “Kurakas and Commerce: A Chapter in the Evolution of Andean Society.” Hispanic American Historical Review, 53:4 (November), 581–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starobinski, Jean. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, la transparence et l'obstacle. Paris: P.U.F.Google Scholar
Taylor, Lewis. 1979. “Main Trends in Agrarian Capitalist Development: Cajamarca, Peru, 1880–1976.” Ph.D. diss., University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Vergopoulos, K. 1978. “Capitalism and Peasant Productivity.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 5:4, 446–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1984. The Politics of the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Bill. 1980. Imperialism, Pioneer of Capitalism. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Winder, David. 1978. “The Impact of the ‘Comunidad’ on Local Development in the Mantaro Valley,” in Peasant Cooperation and Capitalist Expansion in Central Peru Long, N. and Roberts, B., eds., 109–40. Austin: Institute for Latin American Studies, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar