Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T08:28:17.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laurent polynomials, GKZ-hypergeometric systems and mixed Hodge modules

Part of: Deformations of analytic structures Families, fibrations Singularities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2014

Thomas Reichelt
Thomas Reichelt*
Affiliation:
Lehrstuhl VI für Mathematik, Universität Mannheim, Seminargebäude A5, 68131 Mannheim, Germany email thomas.reichelt@math.uni-mannheim.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We endow certain GKZ-hypergeometric systems with a natural structure of a mixed Hodge module, which is compatible with the mixed Hodge module structure on the Gauß–Manin system of an associated family of Laurent polynomials. As an application we show that the underlying perverse sheaf of a GKZ-system with rational parameter has quasi-unipotent local monodromy.

Keywords

Gauß–Manin systemhypergeometric D-moduleRadon transformationmixed Hodge module

MSC classification

Secondary: 14D07: Variation of Hodge structures 32S35: Mixed Hodge theory of singular varieties 32S40: Monodromy; relations with differential equations and $D$-modules 32G34: Moduli and deformations for ordinary differential equations (e.g. Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equation)
Type
Research Article
Information
Compositio Mathematica , Volume 150 , Issue 6 , June 2014 , pp. 911 - 941
Copyright
© The Author 2014 

References

Adolphson, A., Hypergeometric functions and rings generated by monomials, Duke Math. J. 73 (1994), 269–290.Google Scholar
Adolphson, A. and Sperber, S., A-hypergeometric systems that come from geometry, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (2012), 2033–2042.Google Scholar
Batyrev, V. V., Variations of the mixed Hodge structure of affine hypersurfaces in algebraic tori, Duke Math. J. 69 (1993), 349–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borel, A., Grivel, P.-P., Kaup, B., Haefliger, A., Malgrange, B. and Ehlers, F., Algebraic D-modules, Perspectives in Mathematics, vol. 2 (Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1987).Google Scholar
Brylinski, J.-L., Transformations canoniques, dualité projective, théorie de Lefschetz, transformations de Fourier et sommes trigonométriques, Astérisque (1986), 3–134, 251; Géométrie et analyse microlocales.Google Scholar
D’Agnolo, A. and Eastwood, M., Radon and Fourier transforms for D-modules, Adv. Math. 180 (2003), 452–485.Google Scholar
Gel’fand, I. M., Kapranov, M. M. and Zelevinsky, A. V., Generalized Euler integrals and A-hypergeometric functions, Adv. Math. 84 (1990), 255–271.Google Scholar
Gel’fand, I. M., Kapranov, M. M. and Zelevinsky, A. V., Discriminants, resultants, and multidimensional determinants, in Mathematics: Theory & Applications (Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1994).Google Scholar
Hotta, R., Takeuchi, K. and Tanisaki, T., D-modules, perverse sheaves, and representation theory, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 236 (Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 2008); Translated from the 1995 Japanese edition by Takeuchi.Google Scholar
Kashiwara, M., Quasi-unipotent constructible sheaves, J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 28 (1981), 757–773.Google Scholar
Matusevich, L. F., Miller, E. and Walther, U., Homological methods for hypergeometric families, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (2005), 919–941.Google Scholar
Miller, E. and Sturmfels, B., Combinatorial commutative algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 227 (Springer, New York, 2005).Google Scholar
Reichelt, T. and Sevenheck, C., Logarithmic Frobenius manifolds, hypergeometric systems and quantum D-modules, J. Algebraic Geom. (2014), to appear, arXiv:1010.2118 [math.AG].Google Scholar
Reichelt, T. and Sevenheck, C., Non-affine Landau–Ginzburg models and intersection cohomology, Preprint (2012), arXiv:1210.6527 [math.AG].Google Scholar
Saito, M., Mixed Hodge modules, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 26 (1990), 221–333.Google Scholar
Saito, M., Isomorphism classes of A-hypergeometric systems, Compositio Math. 128 (2001), 323–338.Google Scholar
Saito, M., Primitive ideals of the ring of differential operators on an affine toric variety, Tohoku Math. J. (2) 59 (2007), 119–144.Google Scholar
Stienstra, J., Resonant hypergeometric systems and mirror symmetry, in Integrable systems and algebraic geometry (Kobe/Kyoto, 1997) (World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 1998), 412–452.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. and Vilonen, K., Hodge theory and unitary representations of reductive Lie groups, in Frontiers of mathematical sciences (International Press, Somerville, MA, 2011), 397–420.Google Scholar
Schulze, M. and Walther, U., Irregularity of hypergeometric systems via slopes along coordinate subspaces, Duke Math. J. 142 (2008), 465–509.Google Scholar
Schulze, M. and Walther, U., Hypergeometric D-modules and twisted Gauß–Manin systems, J. Algebra 322 (2009), 3392–3409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, U., Duality and monodromy reducibility of A-hypergeometric systems, Math. Ann. 338 (2007), 55–74.Google Scholar