Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T22:41:43.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Like my father before me: intergenerational occupational status transfer during industrialization (Zeeland, 1811–1915)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

RICHARD L. ZIJDEMAN
RICHARD L. ZIJDEMAN
Affiliation:
Interuniversity Centre for Social Science Theory and Methodology/Department of Sociology, Utrecht University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article studies the influence of macro-level developments on intergenerational status transfer in the Dutch province of Zeeland between 1811 and 1915. Hypotheses on the effects of industrialization, educational expansion, mass communication, urbanization, geographical mobility, and mass transport are derived from conflicting theories. The influences of these contextual characteristics on status attainment are tested using hierarchical linear models, incorporating data on some 40,000 fathers and sons in over 100 municipalities. The results show regional as well as temporal differences in the association between a father's and a son's occupational status. In contrast to what is supposed by the logic of industrialism thesis, hardly any of the macro-level developments decreased the influence of a father's occupational status on that of his son. On the contrary, a father's status became more influential in the more industrialized areas.

Comme mon père avant moi: le transfert du statut professionnel entre générations en période d'industrialisation en zélande, 1811–1915

Nous étudions ici l'influence qu'a pu avoir le développement macro-économique sur le transfert du statut professionnel de père à fils dans la province hollandaise de Zélande entre 1811 et 1915. Les effets de l'industrialisation, le développement de l'éducation, l'urbanisation, la mobilité géographique ainsi que les communications et transports de masse ont suscité des hypothèses relevant de théories contradictoires. Nous étudions l'influence qu'ont pu avoir ces aspects du contexte social sur le statut professionnel des individus en recourant à des modèles linéaires hiérarchiques, à partir de données concernant quelque 40,000 pères et fils dans plus de cent municipalités. Il en ressort des différences selon les régions et les époques concernant le lien entre les statuts professionnels du père et celui du fils. Contrairement à ce que permettrait de supposer la logique de la thèse industrialiste, on observe qu'aucun des changements au niveau macro-économique, ou presque, n'a sapé l'influence du statut professionnel du père sur celui du fils. Au contraire cette influence a même pu s'accroître dans nombre de zones industrialisées.

Wie schon mein vater vor mir: intergenerationaler transfer des beruflichen status während der industrialisierung (zeeland, 1811–1915)

Dieser Beitrag untersucht, inwiefern Entwicklungen auf der Makro-Ebene den intergenerationellen Statustransfer in der holländischen Provinz Zeeland zwischen 1811 und 1915 beeinflusst haben. Aus konkurrierenden Theorien werden Hypothesen über die Wirkungen der Industrialisierung, der Bildungsexpansion, der Massenkommunikation, der Urbanisierung, der geographischen Mobilität und des Massenverkehrs abgeleitet. Der Einfluss dieser kontextuellen Merkmale auf den erzielten sozialen Status wird mit Hilfe hierarchischer linearer Modelle getestet, wobei Daten über etwa 40,000 Väter und Söhne in über 100 Städten einfließen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen sowohl regionale als auch zeitliche Unterschiede in der Verbindung zwischen dem beruflichen Status von Vater und Sohn. Im Gegensatz zu den Annahmen, die sich aus der Logik der Industrialisierungsthese ergeben, verringerte kaum eine der Entwicklungen auf der Makro-Ebene den Einfluss, den der berufliche Status des Vaters auf den des Sohnes ausübte. Im Gegenteil, in stärker industrialisierten Regionen gewann der Status des Vaters an Einfluss.

Type
Research Article
Information
Continuity and Change , Volume 24 , Special Issue 3: SPECIAL ISSUE: SOCIAL INEQUALITY AND MOBILITY IN HISTORY , December 2009 , pp. 455 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ENDNOTES

1 P. M. Blau and O. D. Duncan, The American occupational structure (New York, 1967): C. Kerr, J. Dunlop, F. Harbison, and C. Meyers, Industrialism and industrial man (Boston, 1960); Treiman, D. J., ‘Industrialization and social stratification’, Social Inquiry 40 (1970), 207–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Collins, R., ‘Functional and conflict theories of educational stratification’, American Sociological Review 36 (1971), 1002–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar; P. Bourdieu and J.-C. Passeron, Reproduction in education, society and culture (Beverly Hills, 1977); Grusky, D. B., ‘Industrialization and the status attainment process: the thesis of industrialism reconsidered’, American Sociological Review 48 (1983), 494–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 For example R. Erikson and J. H. Goldthorpe, The constant flux: a study of class mobility in industrial societies (Oxford, 1993).

4 For example Ganzeboom, H. B. G., Luijkx, R., and Treiman, D. J., ‘Intergenerational class mobility in comparative perspective’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 8 (1989), 3–84.Google Scholar

5 Ganzeboom, H. B. G., Treiman, D. J., and Ultee, W. C., ‘Comparative intergenerational stratification research: three generations and beyond’, Annual Review of Sociology 17 (1991), 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 M. H. D. van Leeuwen, I. Maas, and A. Miles, HISCO: Historical International Standard Classification of Occupations (Leuven, 2002), and ‘Creating an Historical International Standard Classification of Occupations (HISCO): an exercise in multi-national, interdisciplinary co-operation’, Historical Methods 37 (2004), 186–97.

7 M. H. D. van Leeuwen, I. Maas, and A. Miles eds., Marriage choices and class boundaries: social endogamy in history (Cambridge, 2005).

8 Van de Putte, B. and Miles, A., ‘A social classification scheme for historical occupational data’, Historical Methods 38 (2005), 61–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 I. Maas, P. S. Lambert, R. L. Zijdeman, K. Prandy, and M. H. D. van Leeuwen, ‘HIS-CAM, the derivation then implementation of a historical occupational stratification scale’, paper presented to the Sixth European Social Science History Conference, Amsterdam, 2006. See also P. S. Lambert, R. L. Zijdeman, I. Maas and M. H. D. van Leeuwen, ‘Testing the universality of historical occupational stratification structures across time and space’, paper presented to the ISA RC28 ‘Social Stratification and Mobility’ spring meeting, Nijmegen, 11–14 May 2006, available at http://www.camsis.stir.ac.uk/hiscam/lambert_et_al_rc28nij06.pdf, and R. L. Zijdeman and P. S. Lambert, ‘Measuring historical occupational information: a comparison of historical occupational class schemes and stratification scales on Dutch 19th century and early 20th century data’, in B. van de Pütte, E. Buyst and M. H. D. van Leeuwen eds., The occupation in historical research, special issue of Revue Belge d'Histoire Contemporaine 39 (3–4) (2009), forthcoming.

10 Since relatively few women had an occupation that was registered on the marriage record, we restrict our analyses to the male population.

11 See for example Ganzeboom, Treiman, and Ultee, ‘Comparative intergenerational stratification’; Smits, J., Ultee, W., and Lammers, J., ‘Educational homogamy in 65 countries: an explanation of differences in openness using country-level explanatory variables’, American Sociological Review 63 (1998), 264–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; I. K. Fukumoto and D. B. Grusky, ‘Social mobility and class structure in early industrial France’, in A. Miles and D. Vincent eds., Building European society: occupational change and social mobility in Europe 1840–1940 (Manchester, 1993), 40–67; A. Miles, Social mobility in nineteenth- and early twentieth-century England (Basingstoke, 1999); and Lambert, P. S., Prandy, K., and Bottero, W., ‘By slow degrees: two centuries of social reproduction and mobility in Britain’, Sociological Research Online 12 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Tipps, D. C., ‘Modernization theory and the comparative study of societies: a critical perspective’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 15 (1973), 199–226, especially p. 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 See for example the contributions by Smelser and Bendix in A. Etzioni and E. Etzioni eds., Social change: sources, patterns, and consequences (New York, 1964).

14 Treiman, ‘Industrialization and social stratification’.

15 Blau and Duncan, The American occupational structure.

16 Miles, Social mobility.

17 K. Davis, ‘Social and demographic aspects of economic development in India’, in S. Kuznets, W. Moore, and J. Spengler eds., Economic growth: Brazil, India, and Japan (Durham, 1955), 255.

18 Kuznets, S., ‘Quantitative aspects of the economic growth of nations: II. Industrial distribution of national product and labor force’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 5 (1957), 1–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Treiman, ‘Industrialization and social stratification’.

19 Kuznets, ‘Quantitative aspects’, 28–31.

20 Hurd, G. E. and Johnson, T. J., ‘Education and social mobility in Ghana’, Sociology of Education 40 (1967), 55–70, especially pp. 60–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21 Treiman, ‘Industrialization and social stratification’.

22 Grusky, ‘Industrialization and the status attainment process’; Treiman, ‘Industrialization and social stratification’.

23 Treiman, ‘Industrialization and social stratification’, 219.

24 Ibid., 220.

25 Ibid.

26 Grusky, ‘Industrialization and the status attainment process’; Bourdieu and Passeron, Reproduction in education; Collins, ‘Functional and conflict theories’.

27 Bourdieu and Passeron, Reproduction in education.

28 Collins, ‘Functional and conflict theories’.

29 Ibid., 1011.

30 Treiman, ‘Industrialization and social stratification’.

31 P. Priester, Geschiedenis van de Zeeuwse Landbouw, circa 1600–1910 ('t Goy-Houten, 1998), 446.

32 Ibid.

33 Verslag van den Landbouw in Nederland over 1870 (The Hague, 1871) and Verslag van den Landbouw in Nederland over 1871 (The Hague, 1872); G. A. Hoekveld, ‘Nederland in West-Europa’, in G. A. Hoekveld and P. Schat eds., Geografische verkenningen (Roermond, 1972), 186–229; H. Knippenberg and B. C. de Pater, De eenwording van Nederland (Nijmegen, [1988] 1990).

34 Priester, Geschiedenis van de Zeeuwse; A. F. Franken, Op Stoom! Industrieel erfgoed in Zeeland (1850–1970) (Middelburg, 2004).

35 M. S. C. Bakker, ‘Voeding in Nederland’, in Geschiedenis van de Techniek in Nederland I (Zutphen, 1992); Priester, Geschiedenis van de Zeeuwse, 245.

36 J. L. van Zanden, ‘Mest en Ploeg’, in Geschiedenis van de Techniek in Nederland, 65.

37 Priester, Geschiedenis van de Zeeuwse, 241.

38 Franken, Op Stoom!

39 Ibid.

40 J. W. Sluiter, Overzicht van de Nederlandse Spoor- en Tramwegbedrijven, 3rd edn (Utrecht, 2002). Wichor Bramer, http://www.stationsweb.nl [last accessed 12 November 2008].

41 Sluiter, Overzicht van de Nederlandse Spoor- en Tramwegbedrijven.

42 P. J. Bouman, Geschiedenis van den Zeeuwschen landbouw in den negentiende en twintigste eeuw en van de Zeeuwsche landbouw-maatschappij, 1843–1943 (Wageningen, 1946); Bras, H. and Kok, J., ‘“They live in indifference together”: marriage mobility in Zeeland, The Netherlands, 1796–1922’, International Review of Social History 50 (2005), 247–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Priester, Geschiedenis van de Zeeuwse.

43 B. Nauta, ‘Naar eenheid van tijd in Nederland 1835–1909’ (unpublished Master's thesis, University of Amsterdam, 1987).

44 T. A. B. Snijders and R. J. Bosker, Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (London, 1999); J. Hox, Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications (London, 2002).

45 I am grateful to the volunteers who input the data during 1997–2001 and to Leo Hollestelle for making the data available.

46 Delger, H. and Kok, J., ‘Bridegrooms and biases: a critical look at the study of intergenerational mobility on the basis of marriage certificates’, Historical Methods 31 (1998), 113–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47 R. L. Zijdeman and K. Mandemakers, ‘De rol van het gymnasiaal en middelbaar onderwijs bij de intergenerationele overdracht van status, Nederland 1865–1940’, in I. Maas, M. H. D. van Leeuwen, and K. Mandemakers eds., Mens en Maatschappij (special issue) (2008).

48 F. van Poppel and R. van Gaalen, ‘Sociale klasse, sociale mobiliteit en sterfte in Nederland, 1850–2007’, ibid.

49 Van Leeuwen, Maas, and Miles, HISCO.

50 Maas et al., ‘HIS-CAM’.

51 A. Stewart, K. Prandy, and R. M. Blackburn, Social stratification and occupations (London, 1982); Prandy, K., ‘The social interaction approach to the measurement and analysis of social stratification’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 19 (2000), 215–49Google Scholar; Prandy, K. and Lambert, P., ‘Marriage, social distance and the social space: an alternative derivation and validation of the Cambridge Scale’, Sociology 37 (2003), 397–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar; W. Bottero, Stratification: social division and inequality (London, 2005).

52 Goodman, L. A., ‘Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (1979), 537–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53 R. L. Zijdeman, hco_hca_v01.inc, SPSS macro to derive HIS-CAM(v.0.1) scores from HISCO, available on request (email: r.l.zijdeman@uu.nl) (2006).

54 Davis, ‘Social and demographic aspects’.

55 The Registers of the Dutch Department for Steam Engineering are available through the Data Archiving and Networked Services at http://www.dans.knaw.nl [last accessed 12 November 2008].

56 Verslag van den staat der hooge-, middelbare en lagere scholen, 1862–1917.

57 K. Mandemakers, HBS en gymnasium: ontwikkeling, structuur, sociale achtergrond en schoolprestaties, Nederland, circa 1800–1968 (Amsterdam, 1996).

58 For example, the estimated number of students in 1902 is the equivalent of three times the number of students in 1900 and twice the number of students in 1905, divided by five.

59 H. Bras, Zeeuwse meiden: dienen in de levensloop van vrouwen, ca. 1850–1950 (Amsterdam, 2002). F. van Poppel and P. Ekamper, ‘De Goudse horizon verruimd: Veranderingen in de herkomst van Goudse bruiden en bruidegoms’, in J. Kok and M. H. D. van Leeuwen eds., Genegenheid en gelegenheid: twee eeuwen partnerkeuze en huwelijk (Amsterdam, 2005), 181–211.

60 I would like to thank Saskia Spiekman of the archive of the Museum of Communication for her advice and support.

61 For a description of the data, see E. Beekink, O. Boonstra, T. Engelen, and H. Knippenberg eds., Nederland in verandering: maatschappelijke ontwikkelingen in kaart gebracht, 1800–2000 (Amsterdam, 2003).

62 Bramer, http://www.stationsweb.nl [last accessed 12 November 2008]. Sluiter, Overzicht van de Nederlandse Spoor- en Tramwegbedrijven.

63 Sluiter, Overzicht van de Nederlandse Spoor- en Tramwegbedrijven.

64 M. F. A. Linders-Rooijendijk, ‘Gebaande Wegen voor Mobiliteit en Vrijetijdsbesteding: de ANWB als Vrijwillige Associatie, 1883–1937’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Catholic University Brabant, 1989).

65 A. Miles, Social mobility, 121, 126.

66 Snijders and Bosker, Multilevel analysis.

67 Grusky, ‘Industrialization and the status attainment process’.

68 Raab, M. et al. , ‘Global index: a sociological approach to globalization measurement.’ International Sociology 23 (2008), 596–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

69 Blackburn, R. M. and Prandy, K., ‘The reproduction of social inequality’, Sociology 31 (1997), 491–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

70 Ganzeboom, Treiman, and Ultee, ‘Comparative intergenerational stratification’, 289, 295.