No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Critique of Metaphysical Violence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 November 2017
Abstract
This study bridges secular philosophical perspectives and Christian theological perspectives by showing how the critique of metaphysical violence is common to certain representatives of both parties. By examining specifically metaphysical, and therefore epistemologically significant, ways of critiquing violence, this study seeks to show that, just as violence cuts across the sacred-secular divide and spans the distance between abstraction and action, so too does the critique of violence.
Cette étude rapproche les perspectives philosophiques laïques et les perspectives théologiques chrétiennes en montrant comment la critique de la violence métaphysique est commune à certains représentants des deux parties. En examinant spécifiquement les méthodes métaphysiques et, par conséquent, épistémologiquement significatives permettant de critiquer la violence, cette étude cherche à montrer que, tout comme la violence traverse le fossé sacré-laïque et couvre la distance entre l’abstraction et l’action, il en va de même de la critique de la violence.
Keywords
- Type
- Original Article/Article original
- Information
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 125 - 162
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2017
References
Adorno, Theodor, and Horkheimer, Max 1988 Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. Cumming, John. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio 2011 The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government. Trans. Chiesa, Lorenzo and Mandarini, Matteo. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio 2015 Pilate and Jesus. Trans. Kotsko, Adam. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Anidjar, Gil 2008 “Secularism,” in Semites: Race, Religion, Literature. 39–63. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal 2003 Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Balibar, Étienne 2015 Violence and Civility: On the Limits of Political Philosophy. Trans Goshgarian, G.M.. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bataille, Georges 1989 Theory of Religion. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter 1978 “Critique of Violence,” in Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. 277–300. Edited by Demetz, Peter. Trans. Jephcott, Edmund. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter 2003 “On the Concept of History,” Trans. Jephcott, Edmund in Selected Writings. Volume 4, 1938-1940. 389–400. Edited by Eiland, Howard and Jennings, Michael W.. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Bloch, Ernst 1970 A Philosophy of the Future. Trans. Cumming, John. London: Herder & Herder.Google Scholar
Blond, Philip (Ed.) 1997 Post-Secular Philosophy: Between Philosophy and Theology. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blumenburg, Hans 1983 The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Trans. Wallace, Robert M.. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel, and Barton, Carolyn 2016 Imagine No Religion: How Modern Abstractions Hide Ancient Realities. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Casanova, José 2011 “The Secular, Secularizations, Secularisms,” in Rethinking Secularism. Edited by Calhoun, Craig, Juergensmeyer, Mark, and VanAntwerpen, Jonathan. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, William T. 2002 Theopolitical Imagination: Discovering the Liturgy as a Political Act in an Age of Global Consumerism. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Dianne 1993 “Violence Against Violence Against Women,” in The Last Sex: Feminism and Outlaw Bodies. 29–66. Edited by Arthur, and Kroker, Marilouise. CultureTexts 11. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Creston, Milbank, John, and Žižek, Slavoj (Eds.) 2005 Theology and the Political: The New Debate. Sic. 5. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1978 “Violence and Metaphysics: An Essay on the Thought of Emmanuel Levinas,” in Writing and Difference. 79–153. Trans. Bass, Alan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 2002 “Force of Law,” in Acts of Religion. 230–298. Edited by Anidjar, Gil. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dumézil, Georges 1970 Archaic Roman Religion. Volume 1. Trans. Philip Krapp. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1980 “Truth and Power,” in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. 109–133. Edited by Gordon, Colin. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1997 “Christianity and Confession,” in The Politics of Truth. 199–235. Edited by Lotringer, Sylvère and Hochroth, Lysa. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda 2007 Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, Michael Allen 2008 The Theological Origins of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingerich Hiebert, Kyle 2017 The Architectonics of Hope: Violence, Apocalyptic, and the Transformation of Political Theology. Theopolitical Visions 21. Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books.Google Scholar
Girard, René 1986 The Scapegoat. Trans. Freccero, Yvonne. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1973 “Some Difficulties in the Attempt to Link Theory and Praxis,” in Theory and Practice. 1–40. Trans. Viertel, John. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Hamerton-Kelly, Robert G. 1994 “The Generative Mimetic Scapegoating Mechanism,” in The Gospel and the Sacred: Poetics of Violence in Mark. 129–152. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Haverkamp, Anselm 2005 “Anagrammatics of Violence: The Benjaminian Ground of Homo Sacer.” Trans. Wetters, Kirk, in Politics, Metaphysics, and Death: Essays on Giorgio Agamben’s Homo Sacer. 135–144. Edited by Norris, Andrew. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessel, Stéphane 2011 Time for Outrage / Indignez-vous! Trans. Duvert, Marion. New York: Twelve/Hachette.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max 1972 “Traditional and Critical Theory.” Trans. Shapiro, Jeremy J., in Critical Theory: Selected Essays. 188–243. New York: Herder & Herder.Google Scholar
Jantzen, Grace 2004 Foundations of Violence: Death and the Displacement of Beauty. Volume I. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jantzen, Grace 2009 Violence to Eternity: Death and the Displacement of Beauty. Volume II. Edited by Carrette, Jeremy and Joy, Morny. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lorey, Isabell 2015 State of Insecurity: Government of the Precarious. Trans. Derieg, Aileen. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Löwy, Michael 2005 Fire Alarm: Reading Walter Benjamin’s “On the Concept of History.” Trans. Turner, Chris. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Martin, David 1969 The Religious and the Secular: Studies in Secularization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, David 2005 On Secularization: Towards A Revised General Theory. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Masuzawa, Tomoko 2005 The Invention of World Religions: Or, How European Universalism was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, Johann Baptist 1969 Theology of the World. Trans. Glen-Doepel, William. London: Burns & Oates.Google Scholar
Metz, Johann Baptist 1980 Faith in History and Society: Toward a Practical Fundamental Theology. Trans. Smith, David. New York: Seabury.Google Scholar
Metz, Johann Baptist 1985 “Productive Noncontemporaneity,” in Observations on “The Spiritual Situation of the Age.” 169–177. Edited by Habermas, Jürgen. Trans. Buchwalter, Andrew. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Milbank, John 2006 Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason, 2nd ed. London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramazanoğlu, Caroline, and Holland, Janet 2002 Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhard, Kenneth 2005 “Toward a Political Theology of the Neighbor,” in The Neighbor: Three Inquiries in Political Theology. 11–75. By Žižek, Slavoj, Santner, Eric, and Reinhard, Kenneth. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl 2005 Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Trans. Schwab, George. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Anthony Paul 2015 “Post-Secularism: Introduction,” in Reading the Abrahamic Faiths: Rethinking Religion and Literature. 221–236. Edited by Mason, Emma. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony Paul, and Whistler, Daniel (Eds.) 2010 After the Postsecular and the Postmodern: New Essays in Continental Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J.Z. 1998 “Religion, Religions, Religious,” in Critical Terms for Religious Studies. 269–284. Edited by Taylor, Mark C.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sölle, Dorothee 1969 The Truth is Concrete. Trans. Livingstone, Dinah. London: Burns & Oates.Google Scholar
Sölle, Dorothee 1974 Political Theology. Trans. Shelley, John. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Sölle, Dorothee 1978 Death by Bread Alone: Texts and Reflections on Religious Experience. Trans. Sheidt, David L.. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Sölle, Dorothee 1982 “Theology and Liberation,” in Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses . 113–131. Supplement 11. Edited by Smillie, Benjamin G..Google Scholar
Stijn, Latré, Herck, Walter van, and Vanheeswijk, Guido (Eds.) 2014 Radical Secularization? An Inquiry into the Religious Roots of Secular Culture. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Taubes, Jacob 2009 Occidental Eschatology. Trans. Ratmoko, David. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Chloë 2009 The Culture of Confession from Augustine to Foucault: A Genealogy of the “Confessing Animal.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wink, Walter 1992 Engaging the Powers: Discernment and Resistance in a World of Domination. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar