Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-zrtmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-01T16:27:46.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

La science économique à la recherche de ses fondements. La tradition épistémologique ricardienne (1826–1891)Michel Zouboulakis Collection «Bibliotheque d'histoire des sciences» Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1993, vi, 229 p.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Mario Seccareccia
Mario Seccareccia
Affiliation:
Université d'Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews/Comptes rendus
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , Summer 1995 , pp. 633 - 636
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Hollander, S. 1982 «On the Substantive Identity of the Ricardian and Neo-Classical Conceptions of Economic Organization: The French Connection in British Classicism». Revue canadienne d'économique, vol. 15, no 4 (novembre), p. 586–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katouzian, H. 1980 Ideology and Method in Economics. New York, New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrdal, G. 1953 The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory. Londres, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Samuels, W. J. 1988 «An Essay on the Nature and Significance of the Normative Nature of Economics». Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 10, no 3 (prin-temps), p. 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar