Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T03:13:54.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dispositions: An Integrational Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Daihyun Chung
Daihyun Chung*
Affiliation:
Ewha Womans University, South Korea
*
Daihyun Chung, Ewha Womans University, Ssangyong 104-101 Poongdong, Goyangsi 411-757, South Korea. Email: chungdhn@ewha.ac.kr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whereas the Humean accounts of causality in terms of contiguity, temporal priority, constant conjunction, and contingency face difficulties of one sort, the dispositional explanations of causality in terms of reciprocity, simultaneity, ubiquity, and holism seem to meet difficulties of another sort. But the difficulties which dispositionalism faces may be dissipated if one can appeal consistently to the logic of naturalism, rather than to the grammar of an implicit dualism, for example, as it is illustrated when G. Molnar tried to advance the analogy between the mental intentionality and the physical intentionality.

The notion of integration is taken to allow a conceptual space for naturalism of one kind. It may be expressed in the thesis that there is integrationality in any entity like dispositions, such that the integrationality is a power to realize the embedded objective of it in the context where it interacts with all others. The thesis would help to see how dispositions can be intentional, how the notion of information may be read integrationally from any object, and how the notion of fitting plays a role in the metaphysics of integrationality.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 62 , Issue 2: Current Trends in Korean Philosophy , May 2015 , pp. 32 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Author Note

A draft of this paper was read at the Disposition and Mind Workshop, Kyung Hee University, May 30–31, 2012. Encouragement and help was given to improve the draft, and I am grateful for the participants in the workshop, especially Professors Kai-Yuan Cheng, Sungho Choi, John Heil, and John Michael McGuire.

References

Bird, A (2012) Dispositional expressions. In Russell, G, Fara, DG (eds) The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language. London: Routledge, pp. 728–740.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D (1996) The Conscious Mind. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Chen K-Y (2009) Semantic dispositionalism, idealization, and ceteris paribus clauses, Minds and Machines, 19(3): 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S (2009) The conditional analysis of dispositions and the intrinsic dispositions thesis, Phil. and Phen. Research, 78(3): 568–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, D (1997) 맞음의 철학 - 진리와 의미를 위하여. Seoul: Cheolhakgwa Hyeonsilsa.Google ScholarPubMed
Chung, D (2001) 심성내 용의 신체성. Seoul: Acanet.Google ScholarPubMed
Chung, D (2007) Intentionality of Cheng (誠): toward an organic view, Philosophy and Culture, 2: 33–40.Google Scholar
Clarke, R (2010) Opposing powers, Phi. St., 149(2): 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Confucius (1971) Analects, The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean, transl. by Legge, J. Dover: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Davidson, D (1980) Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Dretske, F (1988) Explaining Behaviour: Reasons in a World of Causes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Floridi, L, ed. (2004) Philosophy of Computing and Information. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Floridi, L (2010) Information: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A (1986) Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, N (1978) Ways of Worldmaking. Indiananpolis, IN: Hackett.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, N, Elgin, CZ (1988) Reconceptions in Philosophy. Indiananpolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Heil, J (2010) Powerful qualities. In Marmodoro, A (ed.) The Metaphysics of Powers. London: Routledge, pp. 58–72.Google Scholar
Kim, J (1966) On the psycho-physical identity theory, American Philosophical Quarterly, 3(3): 227–235.Google Scholar
Kim, S (2009) “함석헌과 씨알 철학의 이념,” 哲學硏究, 109: 1–27.Google Scholar
Legge, J (1893) Translator's Prolegomena. In The Chinese Classics, i: Confucian Analects, the Great Learning, and the Doctrine of the Mean. Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 50–55.Google Scholar
Martin, CB (2008) Power for realists. In Bacon, JB, Campbell, K, Reinhardt, L (eds) Ontology, Causality, and Mind: Essays in Honour of D. M. Armstrong. Cambridge: cup, pp. 175–185.Google Scholar
Millikan, RG (1993) White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Molnar, G (2003) Powers. A Study in Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Mumford, S, Anjum, RL (2010) A powerful theory of causation. In Marmodoro, A (ed.) The Metaphysics of Powers. London: Routledge, pp. 143–159.Google Scholar
Mumford, S, Anjum, RL (2011) Getting Causes from Powers. Oxford: Oxford UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J, Perry, J (1994) Intentionality. In Guttenplan, S (ed.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shannon, CE (1998) The Mathematical Theory of Communication [1949]. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, JA (1990) Information, physics, quantum: the search for links. In Zureck, WH (ed.) Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 309–336.Google Scholar
Williams, NE (2010) Puzzling powers. the problem of fit. In Marmodoro, A (ed.) The Metaphysics of Powers. London: Routledge, pp. 84–105.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L (1958) Philosophical Investigation. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar