Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T11:07:23.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Real-Time Mortality Surveillance Based on Media Reports

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2016

Olaniyi O. Olayinka Open the ORCID record for Olaniyi O. Olayinka [Opens in a new window] ,
Tesfaye M. Bayleyegn ,
Rebecca S. Noe ,
Lauren S. Lewis ,
Vincent Arrisi  and
Amy F. Wolkin
Olaniyi O. Olayinka*
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Health Studies Branch, Atlanta, Georgia
Tesfaye M. Bayleyegn
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Health Studies Branch, Atlanta, Georgia
Rebecca S. Noe
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Health Studies Branch, Atlanta, Georgia
Lauren S. Lewis
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Health Studies Branch, Atlanta, Georgia
Vincent Arrisi
Affiliation:
New Jersey Department of Health, Office of Vital Statistics and Registry, Trenton, New Jersey
Amy F. Wolkin
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Health Studies Branch, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Olaniyi Olayinka, MD, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Health Studies Branch, Atlanta, Georgia (e-mail: oolayink@odu.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

We evaluated the usefulness and accuracy of media-reported data for active disaster-related mortality surveillance.

Methods

From October 29 through November 5, 2012, epidemiologists from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) tracked online media reports for Hurricane Sandy–related deaths by use of a keyword search. To evaluate the media-reported data, vital statistics records of Sandy-related deaths were compared to corresponding media-reported deaths and assessed for percentage match. Sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and timeliness of the media reports for detecting Sandy-related deaths were calculated.

Results

Ninety-nine media-reported deaths were identified and compared with the 90 vital statistics death records sent to the CDC by New York City (NYC) and the 5 states that agreed to participate in this study. Seventy-five (76%) of the media reports matched with vital statistics records. Only NYC was able to actively track Sandy-related deaths during the event. Moderate sensitivity (83%) and PPV (83%) were calculated for the matching media-reported deaths for NYC.

Conclusions

During Hurricane Sandy, the media-reported information was moderately sensitive, and percentage match with vital statistics records was also moderate. The results indicate that online media-reported deaths can be useful as a supplemental source of information for situational awareness and immediate public health decision-making during the initial response stage of a disaster. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;11:460–466)

Keywords

public health surveillancedisastershurricanemedia
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 460 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Glossary of NHC terms. National Hurricane Center. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration website. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutgloss.shtml. Accessed July 9, 2014.Google Scholar
2. Goldman, A, Eggen, B, Golding, B, et al. The health impacts of windstorms: a systematic literature review. Public Health. 2014;128(1):3-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2013.09.022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Emanuel, K. Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature. 2005;436(7051):686-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Webster, PJ, Holland, GJ, Curry, JA, et al. Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science. 2005;309(5742):1844-1846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1116448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Reducing Disaster Risk: A Challenge for Development. United Nations Development Programme, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/1096_rdrenglish.pdf. Published 2004. Accessed September 17, 2015.Google Scholar
6. Brunkard, J, Namulanda, G, Ratard, R. Hurricane Katrina deaths, Louisiana, 2005. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(4):215-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b013e31818aaf55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Morton, M, Levy, JL. Challenges in disaster data collection during recent disasters. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011;26(3):196-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X11006339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Simms, E, Miller, K, Stanbury, M, et al, Disaster surveillance capacity in the United States: results from a 2012 CSTE assessment. Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists website. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/EnvironmentalHealth/Disaster_Epi_Baseline731KM.pdf. Version July 29, 2013. Accessed October 23, 2014.Google Scholar
9. More, Better, Faster. Strategies for improving the timeliness of vital statistics. The National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems website. http://www.naphsis.org/Documents/NAPHSIS_Timeliness%20Report_Digital%20(1).pdf. Published April 2013. Accessed June 24, 2014.Google Scholar
10. Choudhary, E, Zane, DF, Beasley, C, et al. Evaluation of active mortality surveillance system data for monitoring hurricane-related deaths—Texas, 2008. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(4):392-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X12000957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Chen, R, Sharman, R, Rao, HR, et al. Coordination in emergency response management. Commun ACM. 2008;51(5):66-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1342327.1342340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Kapucu, N. Interorganizational coordination in dynamic context: networks in emergency response management. Connections. 2005;26(2):33-48.Google Scholar
13. Hurricane Sandy: A Timeline. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) website. https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/31987. Last updated April 25, 2013. Accessed June 24, 2014.Google Scholar
14. Wang, HV, Loftis, JD, Liu, Z, et al. The storm surge and sub-grid inundation modeling in New York City during Hurricane Sandy. J Mar Sci Eng. 2014;2(1):226-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jmse2010226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Subaiya, S, Moussavi, C, Velasquez, A, et al. Rapid needs assessment of the Rockaway Peninsula in New York City after Hurricane Sandy and the relationship of socioeconomic status to recovery. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(4):632-638. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Ben-Ezra, M, Palgi, Y, Rubin, GJ, et al. The association between self-reported change in vote for the presidential election of 2012 and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms following Hurricane Sandy. Psychiatry Res. 2013;210(3):1304-1306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.08.055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Deaths associated with Hurricane Sandy—October–November 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(20):393-397.Google Scholar
18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001;50(RR-13):1-35.Google Scholar
19. Waeckerle, JF. Disaster planning and response. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(12):815-821. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199103213241206.Google ScholarPubMed
20. Brownstein, JS, Freifeld, CC, Chan, EH, et al. Information technology and global surveillance of cases of 2009 H1N1 influenza. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(18):1731-1735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr1002707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Boak, MB, M’ikanatha, NM, Day, RS, et al. Internet death notices as a novel source of mortality surveillance data. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(5):532-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Checchi, F, Roberts, L. Documenting mortality in crises: what keeps us from doing better? PLoS Med. 2008;5(7):e146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Harrison, C, Jorder, M, Stern, H, et al. Using online reviews by restaurant patrons to identify unreported cases of foodborne illness—New York City, 2012–2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(20):441-445.Google ScholarPubMed
24. HealthMap. HealthMap website. http://healthmap.org/en. Accessed July 31, 2014.Google Scholar
25. Carneiro, HA, Mylonakis, E. Google trends: a web-based tool for real-time surveillance of disease outbreaks. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(10):1557-1564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/630200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Superstorm Sandy memorial site. Legacy.com website. http://www.legacy.com/memorial-sites/superstorm-sandy/profile-search.aspx?beginswith=All. Accessed July 31, 2014.Google Scholar
27. Superstorm Sandy’s victims. CNN website. http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2012/10/us/sandy-casualties/. Last updated November 8, 2012. Accessed July 31, 2014.Google Scholar
28. Mapping Hurricane Sandy’s deadly toll. New York Times website. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/11/17/nyregion/hurricane-sandy-map.html?_r=2&. Published November 17, 2012. Accessed July 31, 2014.Google Scholar
29. Howland, R, Li, W, Madsen, A, et al. Real-time mortality surveillance during and after Hurricane Sandy in New York City: methods and lessons learned. 141st APHA Annual Meeting. American Public Health Association website. https://apha.confex.com/apha/141am/webprogramadapt/Paper284657.html. Published November 5, 2013. Accessed July 31, 2014.Google Scholar
30. Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services website. http://www.ncleg.net/documentsites/committees/JLOCHHS/Handouts%20and%20Minutes%20by%20Interim/2014-15%20Interim%20HHS%20Handouts/November%2018,%202014/VII.%20Vital_Records_Electronic_Death_Records-DHHS-2014-11-18-AM.PDF. Accessed February 4, 2015.Google Scholar
31. Stephens, KU, Grew, D, Chin, K, et al. Excess mortality in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: a preliminary report. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2007;1(1):15-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b013e3180691856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Medical Examiners’ and Coroners’ Handbook on Death Registration and Fetal Death Reporting. 2003 Revision; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics website. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/misc/hb_me.pdf. Published 2003. Accessed August 27, 2014.Google Scholar