Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:17:29.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness: Results From an Evaluation of Michigan's Potassium Iodide Distribution Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Laura R. Zwolinski ,
Martha Stanbury  and
Susan Manente
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: In 2009, the Michigan Department of Community Health (MDCH) made potassium iodide (KI), a nonprescription radio-protective drug, available by mailing vouchers redeemable at local pharmacies for KI tablets, at no cost to residents living within 10 miles of Michigan's 3 nuclear power plants (NPPs). MDCH conducted an evaluation of this program to determine Michigan's KI coverage and to assess general emergency preparedness among residents living near the NPPs.

Methods: KI coverage was estimated based on redeemed voucher counts and the 2010 Census. Telephone surveys were administered to a random sample (N = 153) of residents living near Michigan's NPPs to evaluate general emergency preparedness, reasons for voucher use or nonuse, and KI knowledge.

Results: Only 5.3% of eligible residences redeemed KI vouchers. Most surveyed residents (76.5%) were aware of living near an NPP, yet 42.5% reported doing “nothing” to plan for an emergency. Almost half of surveyed voucher users did not know when to take KI or which body part KI protects. Among voucher nonusers, 48.0% were either unaware of the program or did not remember receiving a voucher.

Conclusions: Additional efforts are needed to ensure that all residents are aware of the availability of KI and that recipients of the drug understand when and why it should be taken. Minimal emergency planning among residents living near Michigan's NPPs emphasizes the need for increased emergency preparedness and awareness. Findings are particularly salient given the March 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant emergency in Japan.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2012;6:263–269)

Keywords

radiation preparednesspotassium iodideKInuclear power plantpublic health evaluation
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , October 2012 , pp. 263 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Crocker, DG.Nuclear reactor accidents—the use of KI as a blocking agent against radioiodine uptake in the thyroid—a review. Health Phys. 1984;46 (6):1265–1279.Google Scholar
2.Cardis, EKesminiene, AIvanov, V, et alRisk of thyroid cancer after exposure to 131I in childhood. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97 (10):724–732.Google Scholar
3.Nauman, JWolff, J.Iodide prophylaxis in Poland after the Chernobyl reactor accident: benefits and risks. Am J Med. 1993;94 (5):524–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Verger, PAurengo, AGeoffroy, BLe Guen, B.Iodine kinetics and effectiveness of stable iodine prophylaxis after intake of radioactive iodine: a review. Thyroid. 2001;11 (4):353–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Food and Drug Administration. Guidance: Potassium Iodide as a Thyroid Blocking Agent in Radiation Emergencies; December 2001. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm080542.pdf. Accessed February 14, 2012.Google Scholar
6.Becker, DV.Physiological basis for the use of potassium iodide as a thyroid blocking agent logistic issues in its distribution. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1983;59 (10):1003–1008.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Becker, DVZanzonico, P.Potassium iodide for thyroid blockade in a reactor accident: administrative policies that govern its use. Thyroid. 1997;7 (2):193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Robbins, JSchneider, AB.Chernobyl and the KI controversy in the United States. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2008;4 (3):117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Federal Register notice: consideration of potassium iodide in emergency plans final rule, 10 CFR 50. Fed Regist. 2001;66 (13):5427–5440.Google Scholar
10.National Research Council. Distribution and Administration of Potassium Iodide in the Event of a Nuclear Incident.Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.Google Scholar
11.US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Consideration of potassium iodide in emergency planning: current status on KI distribution. http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/emerg-preparedness/about-emerg-preparedness/potassium-iodide.html. Accessed July 7, 2011.Google Scholar
12.Blando, JRobertson, CBresnitz, E.Final report: assessment of potassium iodide (KI) distribution campaign and emergency response around New Jersey's nuclear power facilities.New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services. Undated. http://www.nj.gov/health/surv/documents/ki_finalrpt.pdf. Accessed July 3, 2012.Google Scholar
13.Blando, JRobertson, CPearl, KDixon, CValcin, MBresnitz, E.Assessment of potassium iodide (KI) distribution program among communities within the emergency planning zones (EPZ) of two nuclear power plants. Health Phys. 2007;92 2(suppl)S18–S26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Blando, JRobertson, CPearl, KDixon, CValcin, MBresnitz, E.Evaluation of potassium iodide prophylaxis knowledge and nuclear emergency preparedness: New Jersey 2005. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(suppl 1)S100–S102.Google Scholar
15.Carney, JKdeFlorio, FErickson, N McCandless, R.Enhancing nuclear emergency preparedness: Vermont's distribution program for potassium iodide. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2003;9 (5):361–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Fowinkle, EWSell, SHWolle, RH.Predistribution of potassium iodide–the Tennessee experience. Public Health Rep. 1983;2:123–126.Google Scholar
17.Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Questionnaire. 2010. http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/questionnaires/pdf-ques/2010brfss.pdf. Accessed May 20, 2010.Google Scholar
18.US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Nuclear Regulatory Agency Title 10 CFR 50.47. http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part050/part050-0047.html. Accessed August 8, 2011.Google Scholar
19.US Department of Homeland Security. Homeland Security launches new ads to demonstrate importance of family emergency planning. Press Room Archive. Release Date: November 14, 2006. http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1163518483290.shtm. Accessed January 20, 2011.Google Scholar
20.Dauer, LTZanzonico, PTuttle, RMQuinn, DMStrauss, HW.The Japanese tsunami and resulting nuclear emergency at the Fukushima Daiichi power facility: technical, radiologic, and response perspectives. J Nucl Med. 2011;52 (9):1423–1432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Greenemeier, L.Does potassium iodide protect people from radiation leaks? Sci Am. March 2011:15http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=japan-earthquake-tsunami-radiation. Accessed February 14, 2012.Google Scholar