Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T21:23:25.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Knowledge Level of Dentists in Turkey About Their Potential Role on the Disaster Victims Identification (DVI) Team

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2018

Zehtiye Fusun Yasar ,
Elif Durukan  and
Erhan Buken
Zehtiye Fusun Yasar*
Affiliation:
Baskent University School of Medicine, Department of Forensic Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
Elif Durukan
Affiliation:
Baskent University School of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Ankara, Turkey
Erhan Buken
Affiliation:
Baskent University School of Medicine, Department of Forensic Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Zehtiye Füsun Yaşar, Baskent University School of Medicine, Department of Forensic Medicine, 54. Street 68/3 Bahçelievler-Ankara/Turkey (e-mail: zehtiye2004@gmail.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Although dentists are valuable assets in identification teams during disaster events, forensic dentistry is not used effectively in the identification studies conducted in Turkey, and the importance of dental data is ignored. The aim of this study was to determine the level of knowledge of dentists regarding their duties and responsibilities during major disasters.

Methods

This descriptive study was conducted between December 2015 and June 2016. Registered dentists (n=20.280) of the Turkish Dental Association were invited to complete the organization’s online survey. A total of 539 dentists participated in the volunteer workshop. Data were analyzed using SPSS, version 22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). The chi-square analysis was used to evaluate the knowledge level of dentists by group regarding disaster victim identification (DVI) – the process and procedure of recovering and identifying victims of major disasters (eg, earthquake, terrorist attack).

Results

The dentists included in the study consisted of 320 (59.4%) females and 219 (40.6%) males with a mean age of 37.4±12.6 years. The number of specialists and general dentists were 249 (45.6%) and 297 (54.4%), respectively; 249 (69.71%) dentists who had knowledge about forensic dentistry stated that they received this information during their formal training. The percentage of dentists who were aware of the existence of an organization of a disaster response operation in Turkey was 74.2%, but only 20.5% (n=110) had knowledge about DVI. We found that 92.9% (n=104) of these dentists believed that dentists should be included in the team for the identification of disaster victims. On the other hand, only half (52.3%) of the dentists with knowledge of DVI wanted to work on the identification teams. The majority (99.1%) considered DNA analysis to be the safest method for identification.

Conclusion

Our findings show that, although dentists know about the identification process, they do not have enough relevant knowledge. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13:533-538)

Keywords

disasterdisaster victim identification (DVI)forensic dentistry
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , June 2019 , pp. 533 - 538
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dinler, V, Sahin, S, Baydar, CL. Doğal Afetlerde Kurbanların Yerlerinin Tespiti ve Kimliklendirme./Determination of victims location in natural disasters and identification. Adli Bilimler Dergisi/Turk J Forensic Sci. 2007;6(2):50-57.Google Scholar
2. Tuğ, A, Alakoc, Y, Cetin, CM, Hancı, İH. Afet Kurbanlarında Kimlik Tespiti (Disaster Victim Identification DVI)/Disaster victim identification. Adli Bilimler Dergisi/Turk J Forensic Sci. 2002;1(2):11-15.Google Scholar
3. Tuğ, A, Doğan, Y, Hancı, IH, Cetin, CM. Felaket Kurbanlarının Kimliklendirilmesi/Disaster victim identification. Acil Tıp Dergisi/Turk J Emerg. 2003;3(1):23-25.Google Scholar
4. Tuğ, A, Yasar, ZF. Felaket Kurbanlarının Kimliklendirilmesi Calısmalarında Dishekimlerinin ve Dis İncelemelerinin Önemi/The importance of odontologists and odontological studies in disaster victim identification. Hacettepe Dishekimliği Fakultesi Dergisi/J Hacettepe Faculty. Dent. 2006;30(4):77-82.Google Scholar
5. Blau, S, Briggs, CA. The role of forensic anthropology in disaster victim identification (DVI). Forensic Sci Int. 2011;205(1-3):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.Google Scholar
6. Clement, JG. Disaster victim identification. In: Siegel J, Knupfer G, Saukko P, eds. Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, 1st ed. New York: Academic Press; 2000:556-565.Google Scholar
7. Knight, B. Knight’s Forensic Pathology, 3rd ed. London: Arnold; 2004:527-540.Google Scholar
8. INTERPOL Disaster Victim Identification Guide 2014. 2014; http://www.interpol.int/INTERPOL-expertise/Forensics/DVI-Pages/DVI-guide. Accessed April 2015.Google Scholar
9. Ozaslan, A, Iscan, MY, Ozaslan, I, et al. Estimation of stature from body parts. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;132(1):40-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00425-5.Google Scholar
10. Sam, B. Kitlesel Felaketlerde Hekim Sorumluluğu ve Bilirkisilik. 2009. http://www.klinikgelisim.org.tr/eskisayi/klinik_2009_22/11.pdf. Accessed November 20, 2015.Google Scholar
11. Rajshekar, M, Tennant, M. The role of the forensic odontologist in disaster victim identification: a brief review. Malays J Forensic Sci. 2014;5(1):78-85.Google Scholar
12. Graham, EA. Disaster victim identification. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2006;2(3):203-207. doi: 10.1385/Forensic Sci Med.Pathol.:2:3:203.Google Scholar
13. Obafunwa, JO, Faduyile, FA, Soyemi, S, et al. Forensic investigation of mass disasters in Nigeria: a review. Niger Med J. 2015;56(1):1-5. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.149162.Google Scholar
14. Sweet, D. Solving certain dental records problems with technology – the Canadian solution in the Thailand tsunami response. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;159(1):20-23. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.005.Google Scholar
15. Petju, M, Suteerayongprasert, A, Thongpud, R, Hassiri, K. Importance of dental records for victim identification following the Indian Ocean tsunami disaster in Thailand. Public Health. 2007;121(4):251-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2006.12.003.Google Scholar
16. Sweet, D, Di Zinno, JA. Personal identification through dental evidence – tooth fragments to DNA. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1996;24:35-42.Google Scholar
17. Afsin, H, Gunce, ME, Sam, B, et al. Dental identification in airplane accident of THY flight number TK 634. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;136(Suppl 1):279-280.Google Scholar
18. Wagner, GN. Scientific methods of investigation. In: Stimson PG, Mertz CA, eds. Forensic Dentistry. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1977:1-37.Google Scholar
19. Afsin, H, Yasar, ZF, Gunce, ME. Dislerden Kimliklendirme Metodları/Dental identification. Adli Bilimler Dergisi/Turk J Forensic Sci. 2003;2(3):9-15.Google Scholar
20. Afsin, H, Gunce, ME. Scientific methods of identification. Klinik Adli Tıp. 2002;2(2):65-78.Google Scholar
21. Schuller-Gotzburg, P, Suchanek, J. Forensic odontologists successfully identify tsunami victims in Phuket, Thailand. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;171:204-207. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.08.013.Google Scholar
22. Lau, G, Tan, WF, Tan, PH. After the Indian Ocean tsunami: Singapore’s contribution to the international disaster victim identification effort in Thailand. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2005;34(5):341-351.Google Scholar
23. James, H. Thai tsunami victim identification overview to date. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2005;23(1):1-18.Google Scholar
24. Clement, JG. Dental identification. In: Clement JG, Ranson DL, eds. Craniofacial Identification in Forensic Medicine. London: Arnold; 1998:63-65.Google Scholar
25. Hill, AJ, Hewson, I, Lain, R. The role of the forensic odontologist in disaster victim identification: lessons for management. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;205:44-47. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.08.013.Google Scholar
26. Aka, S. Forensic odontology education in dental faculties. Adli Bilimler Dergisi/Turk J Forensic Sci 2008;7(4):7–14.Google Scholar
27. Ozkan, H, Gunce, E, Inanıcı, MA. Forensic medicine education in dental faculties of Turkey. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;136(1):279.Google Scholar
28. Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska, D, Przystańska, A, Łabęcka, M, Kruszelnicki, A. Current status of forensic odontology education – the underestimation of needs? Dent Med Probl. 2013;50(2):217-222.Google Scholar
29. Gunce, E. Identification of disaster victims: DVI organization and role of the forensic odontologist. (Thesis). Istanbul University, Institute of Forensic Medicine. PhD Thesis. 2007:50-55.Google Scholar
30. Doğan, NA. The use of DNA technology in forensic samples in forensic sciences. (Thesis). Istanbul University, Institute of Forensic Medicine. PhD Thesis. 2015:19-21.Google Scholar
31. Alakoc, YD, Aka, PS. Orthograde entrance technique to recover DNA from ancient teeth preserving the physical structure. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;188:96-98. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.03.020.Google Scholar
32. Adler, CJ, Haak, W, Donlon, D, Cooper, A. Survival and recovery of DNA from ancient teeth and bones. J Archeolog Sci. 2011;38:956-964. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.11.010.Google Scholar
33. Lijnen, I, Willems, G. DNA research in forensic dentistry. Meth Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2001;23:511-517.Google Scholar
34. Soomer, H, Ranta, H, Penttila, A. Identification of victims from the M/S Estonia. Int J Legal Med. 2001;114:259-262.Google Scholar
35. Dumancic, J, Kaic, Z, Njemirovskij, V, et al. Dental identification after two mass disasters in Croatia. Croat Med J. 2001;42:657-662.Google Scholar
36. American Dental Association Council on Dental Practice. The dentist’s role in forensic identification: the release of dental records & radiographs, and denture labeling. 2004. http://dmort4.com/DMORT4/resources/ADA_forensic.pdf. Accessed July 2017.Google Scholar